MuleSoft Composer vs Python Connectors comparison

Salesforce and Devart are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Salesforce is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.8, while Devart is ranked #33 with an average rating of 10.0. Salesforce holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Devart’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Devart users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,650 Views
809 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Python Connectors

Read 1 Python Connectors review

587 Views
581 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Python Connectors

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

MuleSoft Composer and Python Connectors offer distinct integration solutions. While MuleSoft Composer provides a streamlined experience, Python Connectors are favorable for their extensive features, making them a strong candidate for technical users seeking customization.

Features: MuleSoft Composer prioritizes pre-built integration templates that speed up setup and deployment. It enables faster project kick-offs. Python Connectors, on the other hand, provide extensive customization options, granting developers significant control over integration operations. This capability makes it a powerful solution for complex integration needs where flexibility is crucial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Composer's cloud-based deployment simplifies onboarding and provides continual technical support, offering an edge in projects with tight deadlines. Python Connectors integrate easily with existing systems but may demand more technical knowledge initially. However, they benefit from a robust community that supports users through the integration process.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Composer requires a higher initial investment but promises quick returns owed to efficient deployments and decreased operational costs. In contrast, Python Connectors have a lower setup cost and offer potentially higher long-term ROI for businesses focusing on customizable integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (16th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)

Python Connectors

Ranking in Data Integration

33rd

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Python Connectors is 0.7%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	0.7%
Python Connectors	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2761659

Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Has improved data integration speeds and strengthened security through secure authentication

In my experience, the best features Python Connectors offers are easy database connectivity, support for secure authentication, and encryption options. We have used encrypted connections and secure authentication methods, so no plain text credentials have helped us, and we found it effective. We found that Python Connectors is compliance-friendly, very secure, and has no plain text passwords or anything.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"Since we started to use Python Connectors, we found it very reliable, and there are many measurable benefits of this."

Cons

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"Python Connectors might get a little less costly, making it a common tool rather than being an expensive or fancy tool."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Python Connectors?

Python Connectors might get a little less costly, making it a common tool rather than being an expensive or fancy tool. It is much costlier than other products, but considering Python language bein...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Python Connectors?

Python Connectors are mainly used to connect between the front-end and back-end of a project. It may seem like an API or a framework. We have used Python Connectors to create an employee dashboard....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Python Connectors?

Python Connectors is actually very easy and user-friendly and accessible, and the most reliable feature is that it is user-friendly. The person who knows Python from top to end feels a master in it...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

SSIS vs Python Connectors

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Graph Data Connect vs Python Connectors

Compared 18% of the time

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs Python Connectors

Compared 12% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Python Connectors

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Python Connectors

Compared 11% of the time

More Python Connectors Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download Python Connectors product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

No data available

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Python Connectors enable seamless data connectivity between Python applications and external data sources, enhancing integration efficiency for development projects.

Python Connectors streamline the process of integrating Python applications with databases, APIs, and other data platforms. They support diverse data sources and protocols, ensuring robust data exchange and manipulation. By handling complex data interactions, Python Connectors empower developers to focus on application logic and innovation, resulting in time-effective project execution.

What are the essential features of Python Connectors?

Multi-Source Connection: Connect to multiple data sources concurrently, supporting a wide array of databases and APIs.
Data Transformation: Facilitate data transformation with built-in functions, allowing seamless integration and manipulation.
Security Protocols: Ensure data safety through advanced authentication and encryption methods.
Real-Time Data Sync: Keep data updated in real-time, improving decision-making capabilities.
Scalable Architecture: Accommodate user requirements with scalable solutions.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Python Connectors?

Increased Efficiency: Reduce development time, allowing teams to focus on core application functionalities.
Cost Savings: Lower costs by minimizing manual integration efforts and errors.
Improved Data Accuracy: Enhanced data accuracy through automated processes, ensuring reliable outputs.
Flexibility: Adapt to changing data structures with a highly flexible connection approach.
Enhanced Security: Benefit from improved security features, safeguarding sensitive information.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Python Connectors simplify data integration, allowing institutions to manage massive datasets effectively and maintain compliance standards. In e-commerce, they enable real-time inventory updates and customer data analysis, enhancing business agility and customer satisfaction.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, IBM and others in Data Integration. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.