Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Boomi and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Boomi is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Salesforce is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8. Boomi holds a 8.6% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 29 Boomi iPaaS reviews

4,030 Views
2,257 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,461 Views
731 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Dell Boomi iPaaS and MuleSoft Composer are leading integration platforms. While Boomi iPaaS stands out for competitive pricing and robust customer support, MuleSoft Composer has an edge in terms of its extensive feature set and perceived value.

Features: Boomi iPaaS is recognized for its ease of use, pre-built connectors simplifying integration, and competitive pricing. MuleSoft Composer is noted for its extensive range of connectors, higher customization abilities, and advanced features, providing a comprehensive integration solution.

Room for Improvement: Boomi iPaaS could improve its documentation, error tracing capabilities, and user guidance. MuleSoft Composer could enhance its performance speed, simplify onboarding, and reduce its learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Boomi iPaaS is favored for quicker deployment times and responsive customer support. MuleSoft Composer offers extensive deployment options but may require a steeper learning curve. However, users find its support resources reliable.

Pricing and ROI: Boomi iPaaS is often viewed as more cost-effective, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with notable ROI. MuleSoft Composer, despite higher setup costs, is valued for its long-term benefits and advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi iPaaS vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS vs. MuleSoft Composer

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

8.3

Boomi iPaaS streamlines integration, boosts ROI over 100%, and saves costs with efficient, rapid deployment and minimal development efforts.

Sentiment score

5.4

MuleSoft Composer improves data exchange, boosts efficiency by up to 70%, and supports scalable integration across departments, suggesting high value.

We have automated complete order-to-cash processes for multiple customers, saving over 90 million dollars.

Pradeep Nunna

Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger

The return is faster since development efforts are minimized, allowing for quicker integration delivery.

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Boomi iPaaS report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.5

Boomi iPaaS support is responsive and knowledgeable, with mixed reviews, valuable community resources, and improved service in high-end plans.

Sentiment score

5.2

MuleSoft Composer's customer service is generally satisfactory, though improvements are needed in response time and priority services.

The tech support is very good, offering immediate responses and chat options.

Pradeep Nunna

Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger

Seamlessly meeting SLAs and providing excellent responses to challenges and issues related to interface and data connectivity.

Rav Bangalore

GenAI Strategist at Wipro Limited

We receive service that is more than adequate, even exceptional.

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Boomi iPaaS report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.9

Boomi iPaaS is scalable and versatile but can become expensive with high integration counts and specific setup challenges.

Sentiment score

6.0

MuleSoft Composer is rated positively for scalability, supporting both large user numbers and smaller groups efficiently.

We have built approximately 1,100 interfaces for one customer, which is a significant achievement.

Pradeep Nunna

Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger

The reason we wanted to use our own Kubernetes cluster was to do automatic scaling for utilized resources, allowing us to save.

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Boomi iPaaS report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.5

Boomi iPaaS is generally stable with 99.99% availability, though some users report occasional issues and a learning curve.

Sentiment score

6.6

Users praise MuleSoft Composer's stability and support, noting minor glitches but effective resource deployment and no crashes.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Boomi iPaaS report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Room For Improvement

Boomi iPaaS requires enhanced API management, improved documentation, simplified pricing, better integration, and advanced version control for users.

MuleSoft Composer needs platform integration, interface, scalability enhancements, effective guidance, AI, simplified configuration, and improved monitoring features.

With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi.

Rav Bangalore

GenAI Strategist at Wipro Limited

The ETL aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at the moment.

Pradeep Nunna

Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger

For more quotes and insights, download the Boomi iPaaS report

It would be better to concentrate on one platform and develop everything on it for the integrated development environment.

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Setup Cost

Boomi iPaaS offers a connection-based pay-per-use model, praised for its flexibility and competitive pricing despite potential cost increases.

MuleSoft Composer pricing is seen as high, prompting calls for regional adjustments to enhance accessibility for medium companies.

While pricing is relative, compared to others, it is favorable.

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year.

Pradeep Nunna

Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger

For more quotes and insights, download the Boomi iPaaS report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Valuable Features

Boomi iPaaS offers flexible, scalable integration with low-code tools, enhancing speed and efficiency for medium-sized organizations.

MuleSoft Composer simplifies integration for Salesforce users with prebuilt connectors and compatibility without requiring programming skills.

It automates the creation and population of a data warehouse, reducing the need to write SQL scripts and procedures.

reviewer2701689

Innovation & Data Management Enterprise Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The integrations and API management are particularly beneficial.

Pradeep Nunna

Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger

When developers learn how to use it, they become productive sooner.

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Boomi iPaaS report

It has more options for installation and architecture because it can run entirely on-premise.

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (17th), AI Observability (38th)

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th), Cloud Data Integration (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 8.6%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 2.5%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Boomi iPaaS	8.6%
MuleSoft Composer	2.5%
Other	88.9%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Pradeep Nunna

Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger

Enables swift integration and automation for seamless order-to-cash processes

Boomi iPaaS offers different modules based on customer use cases, which I find valuable. The integrations and API management are particularly beneficial. The setup process is straightforward, and within three days, you can start working on Boomi iPaaS. It provides automation for everything from order to cash, which is thoroughly documented, tracked, and streamlined within Boomi iPaaS. Additionally, Boomi aids initiatives involving AI by allowing prompts to create integrations and automatically generating documentation.

Read full review

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

January 2026

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

Boomi

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS vs. MuleSoft Composer

January 2026

Free Report: Boomi iPaaS vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi iPaaS vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi iPaaS vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.