

Boomi iPaaS and Zapier both compete in the integration platform category. Boomi appears to have the upper hand due to its mature iPaaS platform with extensive connectors and cost-effective licensing model.
Features: Boomi offers strong any-to-any process creation, system integration flexibility, and robust B2B features. It provides extensive connectors and a mature iPaaS platform for various integration needs. Zapier simplifies creating integrations with a wide array of Zaps, allowing non-technical users to automate processes easily with point-and-click capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Boomi needs to enhance scripting capabilities, API management, and improve its documentation for non-technical users. Simplifying pricing and increasing video guidance is also suggested. Zapier can improve Google Sheets handling, error reporting, and expand its integration library. Pricing for larger automation needs can be restrictive, and support could improve with intuitive chat or call options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Boomi offers flexible deployment options across public, private, and hybrid clouds, including on-premises deployment, receiving positive feedback for responsive technical support. Zapier, primarily a public cloud service, is simple to deploy and user-friendly for non-technical users. Customer service is generally commendable but could improve in responsiveness and interface issues.
Pricing and ROI: Boomi's pay-per-connection model can be cost-effective but may increase expenses with add-ons. It offers high ROI by reducing full-time staff needs. Zapier's free plan can become costly with increased automation needs, potentially discouraging heavy users. Both solutions yield significant ROI, with Boomi's structured pricing and Zapier's straightforward plans offering diverse benefits based on business scale and integration complexity.
We have automated complete order-to-cash processes for multiple customers, saving over 90 million dollars.
The return is faster since development efforts are minimized, allowing for quicker integration delivery.
In a scenario where employing three resources for three months might cost approximately $18,000 to $20,000, Zapier provides substantial cost savings.
Seamlessly meeting SLAs and providing excellent responses to challenges and issues related to interface and data connectivity.
The tech support is very good, offering immediate responses and chat options.
We receive service that is more than adequate, even exceptional.
Their technical support is good; they respond promptly and are very helpful.
This can help if you need assistance, as you can communicate with the community and support system, and most issues are already resolved by AI.
The experience was positive with prompt responses from their team.
The reason we wanted to use our own Kubernetes cluster was to do automatic scaling for utilized resources, allowing us to save.
We have built approximately 1,100 interfaces for one customer, which is a significant achievement.
Zapier is suitable for small or simpler automation but not for complex ones.
Scaling it gets quite expensive, and while I cannot evaluate it purely from a technology perspective, compared to Workato, I would give Zapier a seven for scalability.
In my current company, we had significant challenges with Zapier regarding maintenance, as Zaps were often broken, not necessarily due to Zapier, but due to changes in the input variables.
The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi.
A significant area for improvement is version control.
The ETL aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at the moment.
The error message options in the dashboard should be improved. It should be user-friendly so that beginners or non-technical users can figure out the problems and solutions on their own.
You can build similar or dependent automations in one Zap, which helps with understanding the process without switching between different records.
Having flexibility in creating more complex automation would eliminate the need to transform data within the source or destination.
While pricing is relative, compared to others, it is favorable.
The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year.
The pricing is in accordance with market standards and even lower in some cases.
The pricing of Zapier is slightly higher compared to other market automation tools such as Pabbly, Make.com, and N8N, which have good features but are priced lower than Zapier.
It automates the creation and population of a data warehouse, reducing the need to write SQL scripts and procedures.
The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration.
The maturity of the product is significant.
They have approximately 7,000 connections.
The automation capabilities are impressive.
Creating integration points through webhooks is particularly useful for anyone working on integration projects.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zapier | 0.6% |
| Boomi iPaaS | 0.6% |
| Other | 98.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.
Zapier connects thousands of apps, enabling seamless automation without coding. It supports webhooks, multi-step tasks, and a wide array of integrations. Despite needing enhancements in Google Sheets capabilities, API limits, and UI, it remains a tool for boosting productivity across many sectors.
By linking tools such as Google Sheets, HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, Zapier allows users to automate workflows without coding expertise. Its integrations serve logistics operations, CRM, and social media management. Users can process tracking exceptions and streamline operations with third-party software like QuickBooks, Zoho, and Power BI. Although users suggest features like better Google Sheets handling and improved collaboration tools, Zapier continues to provide expansive automation, enhancing efficiency and facilitating new opportunities through integrations.
What Features Stand Out in Zapier?In logistics, Zapier enhances operations by automating exception tracking and third-party software integration. Its use in CRM and social media streamlines lead creation and workflow automation. Users from diverse industries leverage its extensive connectivity to support intelligence management, generate analytical insights, and execute cross-functional tasks efficiently.
We monitor all Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.