MySQL vs Oracle Java DB comparison

MySQL and Oracle Java DB are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. MySQL is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle Java DB is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. MySQL holds a 7.5% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle Java DB’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MySQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Oracle Java DB users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 150 MySQL reviews

8,912 Views
4,189 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle Java DB

Read 9 Oracle Java DB reviews

509 Views
494 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

MySQL

Oracle Java DB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Oracle Java DB are competing database management solutions. MySQL stands out with its flexibility and extensive community support due to its open-source nature, while Oracle Java DB excels in its seamless integration with Oracle products, making it a strong contender in Java-centric environments.

Features: MySQL is recognized for its multi-threaded architecture, support for a wide range of platforms, and compatibility with LAMP/WAMP setups. It excels in performance and scalability and supports advanced features like replication. Oracle Java DB is known for its Java-based architecture, offering seamless Java integration and native support for JDBC, making it highly efficient for Java application environments.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could enhance its enterprise-grade capabilities by improving certain advanced security features and High Availability options. Documentation for unique use cases could also be more extensive. Oracle Java DB may benefit from broadening its platform support beyond Oracle-centric environments and increasing its scalability options to cater to a wider range of applications.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers straightforward deployment with ample documentation and community support, facilitating a smooth setup across various platforms. Oracle Java DB’s deployment is streamlined within the Oracle ecosystem, backed by comprehensive Oracle customer service, making it ideal for enterprises deeply integrated with Oracle products.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL's open-source model provides low initial costs, offering excellent ROI for budget-conscious businesses. Oracle Java DB, while potentially incurring higher costs due to licensing, delivers substantial ROI through its advanced features and effective integration into Oracle's environment, suited for enterprises seeking a specialized Java-centric database solution.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

150

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Oracle Java DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 7.5%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Java DB is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	7.5%
Oracle Java DB	1.0%
Other	91.5%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Anil-Sinha

Senior Consultant at CGI

Able to process all the reporting and processing in the database itself

We have been upgrading and moving to new environments. I was involved in the solution's initial setup. Some things in the setup are very smooth sailing. However, some setups become complicated because what they set up doesn't meet your needs. So, some tweaking is necessary in certain instances. Having a good understanding of the tool really helps. Oracle Java DB is easy to deploy if it's a new setup. Migrating from an old environment to a new environment takes time because you need the old functionality. A first-time deployment of the application is easy. We just did a default setup and started using it. When we have to migrate, there is too much baggage behind that application, especially from the security point of view.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it as a data store and from that perspective, we get everything we need."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."

"MySQL gives us all of the critical features that we need in a database, but without the costs."

"The fact that it is free is what appeals to me the most."

"It has a community version. When I have to create a new database, I have no problems with licenses."

"What I've been most pleased with is the cost point, performance, and ease of use."

"The most valuable feature of MySQL is its reliability and performance."

"Table partitioning is most valuable. It is easy to use."

More MySQL pros

"The most valuable feature is automation."

"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."

"The solution is stable."

"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."

"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."

"The valuable features include connecting to the database and retrieving data."

"It's very clever."

"The database is quite robust in terms of performance from the SQL side."

More Oracle Java DB pros

Cons

"Improvements to MySQL depend on the specific use case. For example, in my scenario, I frequently need to maintain and store data, which can then be utilized to generate reports. On the other hand, others may suggest incorporating a feature that allows for easier visualization of the data, such as what is available in Power BI or other similar tools."

"The tool needs to improve table visualization."

"While utilizing a comparable algorithm, is noted to be sensitive, especially when configuring the inner device."

"The full-text search feature must be improved."

"As an open-source product, there isn't really any technical support available if you get into trouble or have issues."

"MySQL's performance requires attention. For optimal performance, one should review and sometimes revise the code, particularly when using server-side scripting."

"The data masking functionality should be improved as well as the native encryption functionality in the MySQL database."

"Could use some additional JSON query support in the solution."

More MySQL cons

"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database."

"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."

"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."

"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."

"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."

"The tool might be integrated, but we see performance issues because of overhead."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is free. It is an open-source platform."

"MySQL is a cheap solution."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"The solution’s pricing depends on customer requirements. A license is not required for the community edition."

"The pricing falls within the moderate range."

"MySQL is released under an open-source license, so you have nothing to pay to use it."

"Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."

"The tool is open source."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"The product's pricing is very friendly, with no extra costs after the licensing fees."

"Oracle Java DB is a pricey solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	61

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java DB?

Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database. Various ways of connecting would enhance functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Java DB?

I have experience connecting to a database with Java by using Java code and interrogating the database.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Java DB?

It's important to consider several settings and connection strings, as well as firewall rules when connecting to the database. I would rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 22% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 14% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 7% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

CockroachDB vs MySQL

Compared 2% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Oracle Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 23% of the time

IBM solidDB vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 20% of the time

More Oracle Java DB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

September 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

September 2025

Download Oracle Java DB product report

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Java DB is a relational database management system (RDBMS). Data is stored and queried via SQL or JDBC. Like other RDBMSs, Java DB can also be accessed through a persistence layer such as JPA, Hibernate, or JDO. Java objects can be stored in the columns of Java DB tables.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Université Nice Sophia Antipolis

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB

September 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.