MySQL vs Oracle Java DB comparison

MySQL and Oracle Java DB are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. MySQL is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle Java DB is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0. MySQL holds a 5.8% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle Java DB’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MySQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Oracle Java DB users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 153 MySQL reviews

8,855 Views
3,985 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle Java DB

Read 9 Oracle Java DB reviews

721 Views
692 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

MySQL

Oracle Java DB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Oracle Java DB are competing database management solutions. MySQL stands out with its flexibility and extensive community support due to its open-source nature, while Oracle Java DB excels in its seamless integration with Oracle products, making it a strong contender in Java-centric environments.

Features: MySQL is recognized for its multi-threaded architecture, support for a wide range of platforms, and compatibility with LAMP/WAMP setups. It excels in performance and scalability and supports advanced features like replication. Oracle Java DB is known for its Java-based architecture, offering seamless Java integration and native support for JDBC, making it highly efficient for Java application environments.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could enhance its enterprise-grade capabilities by improving certain advanced security features and High Availability options. Documentation for unique use cases could also be more extensive. Oracle Java DB may benefit from broadening its platform support beyond Oracle-centric environments and increasing its scalability options to cater to a wider range of applications.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers straightforward deployment with ample documentation and community support, facilitating a smooth setup across various platforms. Oracle Java DB’s deployment is streamlined within the Oracle ecosystem, backed by comprehensive Oracle customer service, making it ideal for enterprises deeply integrated with Oracle products.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL's open-source model provides low initial costs, offering excellent ROI for budget-conscious businesses. Oracle Java DB, while potentially incurring higher costs due to licensing, delivers substantial ROI through its advanced features and effective integration into Oracle's environment, suited for enterprises seeking a specialized Java-centric database solution.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

153

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Oracle Java DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 5.8%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Java DB is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	5.8%
Oracle Java DB	1.2%
Other	93.0%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Pranay Jain

Software engineer at Simplifyvms

Robust relational data foundation has supported rapid growth and improved user data management

MySQL can be improved in several ways. It has connectivity errors and administration troubles that sometimes occur, though not consistently. MySQL has slow queries; sometimes when I run a query, it scans the whole table, and if the data is very large, it takes too much time to retrieve the data. There can be resource bottlenecks with RAM and CPU usage being a little lower than ideal. Monitoring system metrics is crucial because we need to identify and address these types of issues. Schema designing is another area for improvement, as a poorly designed schema can lead to data redundancy in the future. If I haven't initially planned for a 20 lakh user database and am only working with a 1,000 user case, it will be very problematic because in the future, it will affect the whole table structure, and we will need to change everything. Thorough thinking is necessary before even creating the table. MySQL documentation could be better. Sometimes when I need to find something related to MySQL, the documentation is not very comprehensive. If I have a problem with it, I have to go to Stack Overflow or something similar to get the full detail. Additionally, sometimes when we are connecting to local MySQL, it says we cannot connect to SQL, and I don't know the reason. The error messages are not very helpful, so we have to investigate those cases manually. There are multiple instances of this occurring. Documentation can be better overall. The integration capabilities could be improved slightly. Whatever I have used is working fine for me currently, but it could be a little better. The UI of MySQL Workbench, which I use, is not appealing to me, so it could be improved. MySQL overall is very good, and the foundation is very strong. We can develop features around it and different types of things inside it, which will make it better in the future.

Read full review

Anil-Sinha

Senior Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Able to process all the reporting and processing in the database itself

We have been upgrading and moving to new environments. I was involved in the solution's initial setup. Some things in the setup are very smooth sailing. However, some setups become complicated because what they set up doesn't meet your needs. So, some tweaking is necessary in certain instances. Having a good understanding of the tool really helps. Oracle Java DB is easy to deploy if it's a new setup. Migrating from an old environment to a new environment takes time because you need the old functionality. A first-time deployment of the application is easy. We just did a default setup and started using it. When we have to migrate, there is too much baggage behind that application, especially from the security point of view.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When comparing MySQL to other solutions it is easier to use and boots up faster. Additionally, when you want to query a lot of data, MySQL is better in performance."

"One of the best features is this solution is easy to use."

"It is free, which is probably its most valuable feature. It is a pretty full-featured relational database. It really does everything we need it to do."

"MySQL is easy and convenient for me. I don't need to rely on anyone. I can write the code and extract the information. It is fast if you know how to use it. The solution is not expensive, and most of the developers know how to use it. It is easy to create tables. The solution is stable and has good performance. The connection with AWS gives regular updates, which is manual otherwise and a nightmare."

"The deployment process is pretty fast."

"I am totally satisfied with MySQL."

"The solution has been very easy to scale so far."

"I would use MySQL for a medium project, with around 1,00,000 hundred thousand users, because of the indexing and stored procedures."

More MySQL pros

"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."

"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."

"It's very clever."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature is automation."

"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."

"The database is quite robust in terms of performance from the SQL side."

"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."

More Oracle Java DB pros

Cons

"The backup methods need improvement."

"I would like to see the automatic backup feature in the solution as well. Data is very important and we need to preserve it in a safe place. It would be good if MySQL can back up the data automatically."

"There are some issues with compatibility with Java environments that need to be improved. When Oracle bought this solution there were some driver changes that caused some issues with operations."

"I feel that some tools which make it easier to create queries or make it easier for other functions would be really interesting to see."

"Rather than going in-depth about the technical features, which a technical person can directly tell, I would say that MySQL should be able to adapt to the next framework. The 5G framework means an unstructured framework. So if MySQL becomes smoother and more adaptable, it'll be easier."

"From a user perspective, the initial setup could be simplified a bit."

"The user interface could be more user friendly. Mainly because most of the times we see black and white digital lines. Something like Python."

"The technical support should be more knowledgeable and available worldwide."

More MySQL cons

"The tool might be integrated, but we see performance issues because of overhead."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."

"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."

"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."

"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."

"Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database."

"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing falls within the moderate range."

"Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."

"I am not paying, but I am not sure about the exact licensing requirements."

"There is a licensing cost because we are going for a proprietary product. There are some other versions for which there is no licensing cost."

"We do have a couple of clients who choose to use the paid, enterprise version of the solution and who take full advantage of it."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"MySQL is a cheap solution."

"MySQL is very cheap. It could be free. It also has a yearly licensing option."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"Oracle Java DB is a pricey solution."

"The product's pricing is very friendly, with no extra costs after the licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	75
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	62

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java DB?

Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database. Various ways of connecting would enhance functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Java DB?

I have experience connecting to a database with Java by using Java code and interrogating the database.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Java DB?

It's important to consider several settings and connection strings, as well as firewall rules when connecting to the database. I would rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 23% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 10% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 4% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Oracle Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Derby vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 10% of the time

IBM solidDB vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 9% of the time

SAP HANA vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Java DB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

January 2026

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

January 2026

Download Oracle Java DB product report

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Java DB is a relational database management system (RDBMS). Data is stored and queried via SQL or JDBC. Like other RDBMSs, Java DB can also be accessed through a persistence layer such as JPA, Hibernate, or JDO. Java objects can be stored in the columns of Java DB tables.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Université Nice Sophia Antipolis

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB

February 2026

Free Report: MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. Oracle Java DB report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.