No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Netdata vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Netdata
Ranking in Server Monitoring
14th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
41st
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
25th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zenoss Cloud
Ranking in Server Monitoring
25th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
52nd
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
42nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (19th), Event Monitoring (14th), Network Monitoring Software (63rd), Container Monitoring (9th), AIOps (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Netdata is 2.2%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 3.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Netdata2.2%
Zenoss Cloud3.2%
Other94.6%
Server Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Peter Kitonga - PeerSpot reviewer
Mid Software Engineer at Jumia Kenya
Real-time monitoring has improved AWS visibility and reduces downtime for critical services
Netdata's best features that I find outstanding are the real-time monitoring, interactive dashboards, automated alerts, and detailed performance analytics. I find these features very valuable because they provide immediate visibility into CPU, memory, network, and server performance, helping us identify bottlenecks quickly, troubleshoot issues efficiently, and reduce downtime. The features I value most include excellent visibility, faster troubleshooting, and practical issue detection, which make Netdata infrastructure monitoring more efficient and reliable. AI governance and security capabilities are important for maintaining data privacy, access control, and transparency. I also value its focus on secure monitoring, controlled access, and protecting sensitive infrastructure data. Netdata has met my expectations through the AI-driven insights, which are generally useful and reliable for identifying performance anomalies and highlighting potential issues. They help us improve monitoring and speed up troubleshooting. Netdata integrates well with our AWS environment, providing useful visibility into server performance, resource utilization, and infrastructure health. It helps us monitor workloads, identify issues quickly, and maintain reliable operations.
ClaudiaChen - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra
Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features
As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Netdata has positively impacted my organization by improving downtime and incident response workflows through real-time visibility into infrastructure and application performance."
"Real-time monitoring and alerts have helped us reduce troubleshooting effort by approximately twenty to thirty percent, saving engineering time and helping maintain a reliable AWS infrastructure."
"Netdata works better for me compared to tools like Prometheus or Grafana by providing real-time metrics and a clear view of system performance in one place with less manual setup than a typical Prometheus and Grafana stack."
"Zenoss is more complex than LogicMonitor, but scalable and hugely customizable."
"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."
"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past."
"Overall, it's a great solution, and I consider it to be one of the best."
"With this solution, they can have one million users at the same time with no crashes."
"It's easy to use."
"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."
"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."
 

Cons

"Netdata could improve by offering more advanced customizable dashboards, simpler configuration for complex AWS environments, and better integration with third-party tools."
"One area that Netdata could improve is with more customizable dashboards and deeper integration with incident management and alerting tools."
"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."
"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"
"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."
"Technical support is 3/10, poor: Incomplete and poor documentation Undocumented processes Inconsistent solutions to problems depending on source"
"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."
"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."
"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."
"This solution is complex for beginners so it takes some time to learn."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It depends on the customer, what he wants."
"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."
"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."
"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Transportation Company
63%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Computer Software Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Construction Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Transportation Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netdata?
As I am going with the subscription-based model in the SaaS, the pricing and setup cost are very nice, and the setup is very easy since I am running the server inside GCP.
What needs improvement with Netdata?
Netdata can be improved by incorporating AI-driven anomaly detection and predictive monitoring capabilities to forecast potential bottlenecks. Additionally, broader native integrations with enterpr...
What is your primary use case for Netdata?
Netdata serves as my real-time monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure and application performance monitoring, providing highly detailed real-time metrics with minimal setup and lo...
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Netdata vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.