No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

NGINX Ingress Controller vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NGINX Ingress Controller
Ranking in Container Management
18th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat OpenShift Container...
Ranking in Container Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of NGINX Ingress Controller is 1.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is 15.7%, down from 22.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform15.7%
NGINX Ingress Controller1.7%
Other82.6%
Container Management
 

Featured Reviews

MuthukaruppasamyR - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network At Dxc Technology Professional at DXC Technology
Reverse proxy and security controls have provided flexible access and strong TLS protection
I have utilized NGINX Ingress Controller SSL and TLS termination feature. We have done extensive SSL offloading on NGINX Ingress Controller and made the TLS configurations to match security requirements, allowing certain TLS versions while disabling others such as 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, and allowing 1.3. The choice depends upon the application requirement. The reverse proxy capabilities of NGINX Ingress Controller in managing distributed applications is central to its main concept. We need to configure it to allow the server to access the outside world and the internet. That is achievable, and we can install and configure NGINX Ingress Controller as a reverse proxy. It can work as a load balancer, but the main part is NGINX Ingress Controller's role as a reverse proxy. If any applications need to be accessed through the proxy to the outside world, then NGINX Ingress Controller is a good product for you. I employ the IP whitelisting feature in NGINX Ingress Controller, which helps secure my application environment. In IP whitelisting, there are several options available. You can determine which IPs to block, for example, if you do not want to give access to specific regions. You can find the list of IP addresses registered in those regions and blacklist them. There is also the web application firewall (WAF) where you can create policies to identify the type of traffic trying to access the application.
NM
Solaris UNIX Systems Engineer at Standard Bank South Africa
Consistent performance impresses users while technical support needs improvement
I definitely recommend Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform to other organizations due to its high availability, security, ease of use, and all the built-in features it offers. We do no maintenance for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform since ROSA is fully managed, and that's why it is a bit more expensive than EKS. The fully managed service includes 24/7 support, scheduling, and upgrades; we only need to inform Red Hat support about upgrades, and they manage the process end to end. Overall, I rate Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform as a nine; although I would say ten, I think it's important to allow room for improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"From my experience, I think the main benefit NGINX Ingress Controller provides to the end user is the reliability of NGINX Ingress Controller itself."
"The main benefit is that it is better in performance, provides security with App Protect and WAF and DDoS, and delivers high performance and high stability."
"NGINX Ingress Controller has positively impacted my organization by helping us with exposing our applications and managing security and auto-scaling."
"However, the response, throughput, and solid performance we receive after implementation are often worth it."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
"The solution is stable. However, it depends on the integrations of the solution on how stable it will be, such as what tools you integrate with."
"It automates rolling out new features, packaging the code, conducting security scans, and deploying to OpenShift."
"The platform is easy to scale as it supports Windows worker node."
"The most valuable feature for me in the OpenShift Container Platform is the option to manage different containers and environments and also being able to switch among them."
"The usability and the developer experience. The platform has a centralized consultant that is easy to use for our development, operations and security teams."
"The best feature is the management for the port life cycle, which automatically recycles, pulls, and scales up and down based on needs and requests."
"Openshift is a very developer-friendly product."
 

Cons

"Nowadays, the quality has been degrading, and I do not expect the same level of service."
"Most customers are satisfied with the reverse proxy capability, but the main issue is that the Ingress NGINX, the one that is most widely used, will be deprecated this month."
"However, there is still a major limitation in GUI capability to manage and observe."
"The product monitoring tool does not work for us."
"Whenever we onboard or deploy services that talk to Oracle Database, they take a lot of time to become active and serve the incoming request, so it would be good to see some improvement here. This could be an OpenShift issue or an internal network problem within our organization."
"OpenShift has certain restrictions in terms of managing the cluster when it's running on a public cloud. For example, identity and access management integration with the IM of AWS is quite difficult. It requires some open-source tools to integrate. This is one area where I always see room for improvement."
"From a networking perspective, the routing capability can be matured further. OpenShift doesn't handle restrictions on what kind of IPs are allowed, who can access them, and who cannot access them. So it is a simple matter of just using it with adequate network access, at the network level."
"We encounter difficulties while accessing the environment and managing the cluster. This particular area needs improvement."
"From a networking perspective, the routing capability can be matured further. OpenShift doesn't handle restrictions on what kind of IPs are allowed, who can access them, and who cannot access them."
"The setup process is not great."
"I want to see more incorporation of native automation features; then, we could write a code, deploy it directly to OpenShift, and allow it to take care of the automated process. Using this method, we could write one application and have elements copy/pasted to other applications in the development process."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product pricing is competitive and structured around vCPU subscriptions, aligning with our application requirements."
"I'm not familiar with pricing or financial aspects. In terms of effort versus benefit, it's worth it."
"I'm an architect, so I have no involvement in the pricing and licensing of the platform."
"We paid for Cloud Pak for integration. It all depends on how many VMs or how many CPUs you are using. They do the licensing based on that."
"We have to pay for the license."
"It depends on who you're talking to. For a large corporation, it is acceptable, other than the significant infrastructure requirements. For a small organization, it is in no way suitable, and we'd go for Amazon's container solution."
"The price is slightly on the higher side. It is something that can be worked on because most of the businesses now have margins."
"OpenShift pricing varies by region. For example, a simple cluster with three nodes in DAL-10 might cost around $560 to $580 per month, subject to specific configurations like memory and CPU cores."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise40
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX Ingress Controller?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. The pricing was expensive at first, but throughout the journey, it became feasible.
What needs improvement with NGINX Ingress Controller?
In my opinion, NGINX Ingress Controller can make better improvements for ingress control, and I think they are already the leader in the Ingress and Gateway API. The Gateway API has the capability ...
What is your primary use case for NGINX Ingress Controller?
I am currently working with NGINX Ingress Controller but in a different perspective than before. We haven't used App Protect anymore, but as an implementer, we use it as a front end for an AI gatew...
Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?
Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?
Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feed...
What needs improvement with OpenShift Container Platform?
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform needs some improvements, for example, in upgrade time, as normally, an extended upgrade method should be allowed, but sometimes if anyone clicks twice, it tries...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat, Kubernetes and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.