One Identity Safeguard vs StrongDM comparison

Read 7 StrongDM reviews

1,820 Views
1,456 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

One Identity Safeguard and StrongDM compete in access management solutions. StrongDM appears to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and advanced capabilities.

Features: One Identity Safeguard offers privileged access management, providing session monitoring, credential management, and audit capabilities. StrongDM extends management to databases and servers, offering seamless integration and infrastructure support, which offers flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard has a structured deployment process with reliable customer service ensuring efficient implementation. StrongDM provides a streamlined deployment model with robust customer support, facilitating quick and comprehensive assistance during setup.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard presents competitive setup costs and favorable ROI for essentials-focused organizations. StrongDM, despite higher costs, offers strong ROI by delivering advanced features and capabilities, justifying the additional investment for expanded benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. StrongDM Report (Updated: April 2026).

One Identity Safeguard vs. StrongDM

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

StrongDM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.3%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StrongDM is 2.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	4.3%
StrongDM	2.5%
Other	93.2%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Mohit X

Dev Ops Engineer And Solution Architect at Scania

Centralized access has improved privileged control and now provides strong audit visibility

I believe StrongDM can improve its initial setup and onboarding experience for larger enterprise environments like Scania, where we have a lot of processes. Integrating different teams, access policies, and existing identity workflows requires substantial planning. Additionally, I think the dashboard customization and reporting could be more flexible for operational teams, though new teams find it manageable. Once the platform is fully integrated, it provides significant value. Apart from the onboarding experience, I would also mention that the templates for enterprise onboarding and policy setup could benefit from innovative thinking tailored to organizations managing large AWS and Kubernetes workloads. Enhanced customization in dashboards and reporting would further ease operations and provide better insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

"One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network."

"Over four years of use, we have not encountered a single system crash or failure, and the product is stable."

"I have successfully connected Identity Manager (IGA) to Safeguard to achieve Privilege Access Governance, making it possible by using an OOTB connector in Identity Manager to talk to the Safeguard system so I can govern the data from Safeguard and provision PAM accounts from Identity Manager to achieve a complete lifecycle."

"It is generally easy-to-use and install."

"I like Safeguard's snapshot feature that enables us to review the last time an application was opened and by whom. If there are any issues, we can look behind the scenes to see what has been done. We can suspend a user's access or close off a server."

"The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."

"Overall, it has helped us save time, improve security, and reduce manual effort across the team."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"I absolutely would say that the best features of StrongDM and what I appreciate about the solution is that time to onboard is absolutely minimal."

"We primarily used StrongDM for access to resources on private networks like EC2 machines, Kubernetes clusters, and various databases."

"The best features in StrongDM are that it is the easiest product in the market for this situation with easy access."

"The best features in StrongDM are the password rotation capabilities, which I think are pretty cool, and also how you can literally log in to any of the privileged servers through a single platform."

"All of the logging is handled for us, including for auditing purposes. Looking through the audit logs is not a painful experience."

"StrongDM positively impacts our organization in many ways, mainly in cost savings from the time saved, and it has significantly improved both security and operational efficiency for us."

"StrongDM replaced the puzzle of different solutions with one single product, which made managing resources more efficient."

"By adopting StrongDM, we have achieved benefits such as eliminating our weekend outages, streamlining ongoing on-call workflows, enabling seamless migration with POC transitions directly into production with minimal effort, allowing our engineers to use their preferred SQL clients like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Workbench, and facilitating compliance through detailed session logs and query capture for SOC 2 and ISO audits."

Cons

"Now, I think the best way to improve it will be to optimize the software, because the software begins to consume more resources (physical)."

"Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

"The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA."

"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."

"There is a lack of documentation and many problems with the plugins."

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."

"Overall, One Identity Safeguard works well, but it could be improved in terms of UI simplicity and ease of navigation, especially for new users."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"I think the stability of StrongDM is about four to five due to the occasional crashes that I mentioned."

"Additionally, StrongDM has limited MFA and passwordless options, relying heavily on time-based one-time passwords (OTP) or Duo, lacking support for true passwordless setups like biometrics or hardware YubiKeys, and it does not support per-session MFA."

"I rate the stability of the product five out of ten because crashes sometimes happen when we are working on it."

"We've had a few issues with the stability of this product in the past."

"I believe StrongDM can improve its initial setup and onboarding experience for larger enterprise environments like Scania, where we have a lot of processes."

"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."

"My thoughts on the pricing of StrongDM is that it is expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is per user per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

11%

Outsourcing Company

University

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	79
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is positioned as an enterprise-grade PAM solution, so the cost is on the higher side.

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is a strong PAM solution, but there are some areas for improvement. The initial deployment and integration process can be complex in large enterprise environments. The user i...

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is that it serves as a secure, strong PAM solution, and we are using it for PAM authentication. In daily work, we use One Identity Safeguard for privileg...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StrongDM?

My thoughts on the pricing of StrongDM is that it is expensive. Coming from knowing the landscape of the market, it is not that they are not competitive. They are still very expensive. That does no...

What needs improvement with StrongDM?

In StrongDM, I think the installation was hard, and they want to be more flexible in the initial setup. I think they want to add more features like traditional PAM. It is difficult to find document...

What is your primary use case for StrongDM?

My use case involves a company I'm working in that wants to secure the connectivity between the DevOps team and the backend server in the company.

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 4% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Endpoint Privilege Manager vs StrongDM

Compared 19% of the time

KeeperPAM vs StrongDM

Compared 17% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM

Compared 16% of the time

HashiCorp Boundary vs StrongDM

Compared 10% of the time

More StrongDM Competitors

Product Reports

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

One Identity Safeguard

May 2026

Download StrongDM product report

May 2026

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

StrongDM streamlines secure, password-less access, reducing attack surfaces with its zero trust approach. It integrates smoothly with existing systems supporting IP whitelisting and excels in managing runtime features while offering comprehensive audit logging and seamless resource access.

StrongDM provides organizations with enhanced security through features like password rotation and efficient management of access to resources such as EC2 instances, Kubernetes clusters, and databases. Its integration capabilities are complemented by cost-effectiveness compared to competitors like CyberArk. Companies utilize StrongDM for controlling access in dynamic environments, benefiting from audit logging for detailed movement tracking. While users appreciate its efficiency, they also seek improvements in update control and better accompanying documentation. Some express the need for a cloud-native option to address diverse demands, as the current setup can be challenging without comprehensive materials. Flexibility and more traditional PAM features are in demand.

What are StrongDM's key features?

Secure Password-less Access: Facilitates client connections without passwords to reduce attack vectors.
Zero Trust Architecture: Maintains stringent security protocols with a zero trust approach.
Seamless Resource Integration: Works effectively with systems like EC2 and Kubernetes clusters.
IP Whitelisting Support: Enhances third-party resource accessibility with targeted IP controls.
Audit Logging: Provides detailed tracking of user interactions within systems.
Password Rotation: Regularly updates access credentials to boost security.

Why is StrongDM beneficial in reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing offers value against alternatives.
Resource Management Efficiency: Simplifies access to complex systems.
Enhanced Security: Protective measures reduce vulnerabilities and ensure secure transactions.
Zero Trust Implementation: Adopts advanced security models right into client operations.
Operational Streamlining: Eases the access management process for multiple environments.

In industries managing sensitive data or requiring regulated access, StrongDM is crucial for securing cloud private networks and managing user access to databases and hosts. DevOps teams benefit from its ability to protect connectivity to backend servers, ensuring identity and access management remains robust and adaptable for companies dealing with frequent changes or expansions.

Sample Customers

Cavium

Information Not Available