OneStream XF vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

OneStream and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. OneStream is ranked #9 with an average rating of 10.0, while Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.1. OneStream holds a 4.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 11.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OneStream users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OneStream XF

Read 3 OneStream XF reviews

1,067 Views
702 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Read 56 Oracle Hyperion reviews

2,475 Views
1,614 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OneStream XF

Oracle Hyperion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle Hyperion and OneStream XF are enterprise performance management products providing financial planning, budgeting, and forecasting solutions. OneStream XF appears to have an edge in flexibility and integration, making it suitable for modern business needs.

Features: Oracle Hyperion offers robust financial management features with comprehensive budgeting, forecasting, and support for complex financial processes. It has extensive legacy integrations, catering well to businesses needing stability. OneStream XF provides a unified platform designed for modern finance, integrating planning, reporting, and analysis. It streamlines processes, adapts to change efficiently, and enhances overall flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Hyperion's deployment can be complex due to its traditional architecture, often requiring considerable IT involvement. Its established service network is helpful in resolving issues. OneStream XF offers a straightforward, cloud-based deployment with efficient configuration and scaling options. Its customer service is recognized for responsiveness and effectiveness, supporting a seamless implementation experience.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Hyperion typically has lower initial setup costs, providing predictable expense structures. However, its traditional model might lead to higher long-term maintenance expenses, affecting ROI. OneStream XF, despite higher upfront costs, delivers significant ROI through agility and efficiency, catering to evolving business environments and offering long-term cost benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OneStream XF vs. Oracle Hyperion Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OneStream XF vs. Oracle Hyperion

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OneStream XF

Ranking in Business Performance Management

9th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Financial Close Software (6th)

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of OneStream XF is 4.6%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 11.1%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

AndyJorgensen

Chief Revenue Officer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Combines consolidations, planning, and forecasting into a single platform, eliminating the need for multiple products and streamlining data management

There's always stuff on the drawing board, and there's an arms race going on in the AI space. It's too soon to pick a winner between OneStream and Oracle. OneStream's smaller, so maybe they're more nimble, but Oracle has more resources. AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet. The other thing is that there are probably little things in the UI and overall processes that could be made easier to use. But there's nothing so consequential that it ruins your experience. It's more about tweaking and streamlining certain processes within the system.

Read full review

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at Infosys

Automation of financial processes streamlines operations but pricing needs improvement

Our clients mostly use Hyperion for their financial requirements, including budgeting, forecasting, and planning The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel. The workflow management of planning and the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were with Oracle previously. With Oracle, you have to buy a different piece of software for every business process. If you want to do budgeting, that's a product. If you want to do consolidation, that's a product. If you want to do BI type of work, that's yet another product. So, you end up buying a lot of software from Oracle. With OneStream, it is a little different. It is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."

"The product's most valuable feature is extensibility."

"It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership."

"The stability is fine and quite user friendly."

"This is a customizable product. Our implementation was designed to fit our needs."

"The scalability is good."

"This solution provides a more structured methodology for doing analysis than a tool like Excel. It creates a central database that keeps all information in one place."

"The implementation has been simplified now that it's deployed in the cloud. Also, Hyperion is tightly integrated with Oracle products because Oracle owns it now."

"We like the reporting and tracking of financials."

"It's very easy to use and the functionality is quite complete."

"Since it is an enterprise-capable solution, people are not worried about security, giving data, the ability to manage complex consolidation, and its ability to modify reporting."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

Cons

"Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser. They're pretty tightly aligned with Microsoft. So, I can see the reasons for it."

"We should be able to download the data in the same format we upload it."

"AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet."

"The interface could be better. It could be more user-friendly, it is not very intuitive."

"The level of complexity of the implementation is always a challenge."

"They could support machine learning algorithms for the product."

"I found the initial setup to be complex."

"The solution is about to cease to exist, so it doesn't really matter if they add anything to it. It's at end-of-life."

"This solution's stability is a little problematic."

"The reporting feature in Oracle Hyperion isn't the best. It needs improvement."

"I would like to see more integrations with third-party vendors such as BigSense and SAP. I'm looking forward to seeing more interface-related content."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that."

"The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors."

"The licensing is expensive."

"The solution is affordable."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"We pay for licensing yearly."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Seeking lightweight open source BI software

I advise you to try OneStream. This is a very good platform focused on reporting, consolidation and budgeting & forecasting.

See all answers

What do you like most about OneStream XF?

It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OneStream XF?

The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors. One thing to consider is their relationship with Microsoft. They often push customers towards Azure, and Azure can get ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

The pricing model could be more flexible as it's more expensive than its competitors. The technical support response time could improve as they often ask for the same logs repeatedly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

Our clients mostly use Hyperion for their financial requirements, including budgeting, forecasting, and planning.

See all answers

Comparisons

Anaplan vs OneStream XF

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle HFM vs OneStream XF

Compared 16% of the time

BlackLine vs OneStream XF

Compared 12% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs OneStream XF

Compared 10% of the time

Jedox vs OneStream XF

Compared 6% of the time

More OneStream XF Competitors

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 18% of the time

Tableau vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 15% of the time

Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 2% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Performance Management

March 2025

Download OneStream XF product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

March 2025

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Also Known As

No data available

Hyperion

Overview

Financial Close, Consolidation and Reporting
Automate the financial close; reduce time waiting for data loads and refreshing of reports throughout the month. Access accurate and secure financial and operational information from any data source.

OneStream

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Fruit of the loom, Melrose, AAA, Valeo Foods

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

OneStream XF vs. Oracle Hyperion

March 2025

Free Report: OneStream XF vs. Oracle Hyperion

Find out what your peers are saying about OneStream XF vs. Oracle Hyperion and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OneStream XF vs. Oracle Hyperion report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.