Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

Oracle HFM and Oracle Hyperion are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Oracle HFM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle Hyperion is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Oracle HFM holds a 7.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle Hyperion’s 9.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle HFM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle Hyperion users who would recommend it.

Oracle HFM

Read 15 Oracle HFM reviews

1,687 Views
1,434 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Read 58 Oracle Hyperion reviews

3,253 Views
2,049 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Oracle HFM

Oracle Hyperion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle HFM and Oracle Hyperion compete in the domain of financial management and enterprise performance. Despite favorable pricing and support for Oracle HFM, Oracle Hyperion is generally preferred for its extensive feature set and perceived value.

Features: Oracle HFM provides strong consolidation and reporting capabilities, ensuring financial management accuracy and compliance, while handling multi-currency translations, complex ownership calculations, and inter-company eliminations. Oracle Hyperion offers advanced analytics and planning, enhancing forecasting and financial strategy alignment, with comprehensive integration with other Oracle solutions.

Room for Improvement: Oracle HFM could enhance its cloud deployment options, user experience, and integration with broader enterprise systems. Oracle Hyperion users indicate a need for more intuitive user interfaces, faster processing speeds during high demand periods, and simplified data migration tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Hyperion is notable for its flexible deployment options across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid models, complemented by extensive customer service. Oracle HFM operates primarily in an on-premise model with standard support, but it lacks the deployment adaptability of Oracle Hyperion.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle HFM is appealing due to its lower initial setup costs, suitable for organizations with immediate consolidation needs. Oracle Hyperion, despite a higher upfront cost, promises greater ROI over time with its extensive features and integration capabilities that significantly enhance financial outcomes.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle HFM vs. Oracle Hyperion Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle HFM vs. Oracle Hyperion

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle HFM

Ranking in Business Performance Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Oracle HFM is 7.6%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 9.8%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

AhmedHaridy

Managing Director at Emkan

Offers flexibility and ease of configuration

The initial setup of Oracle HFM is generally straightforward and not overly complex. The deployment time for Oracle HFM varies with the resources, but it usually takes around three to eight months, with an average of three to four months. The deployment process for Oracle HFM involves several key steps. It begins with the installation of Oracle software, followed by gathering requirements and relevant documents. These documents help define the report formats and service needs. Next, the team configures the system, starting with the enterprise structure, which needs to align with the ERP system. Data loading and configuration follow, with Oracle HFM typically requiring more resources compared to other systems like SuccessFactors.

Read full review

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at Infosys

Automation of financial processes streamlines operations but pricing needs improvement

Our clients mostly use Hyperion for their financial requirements, including budgeting, forecasting, and planning The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel. The workflow management of planning and the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are around consolidations, eliminations, conversions."

"It is an expensive product but delivers what it promises, ensuring regulatory compliance, reducing risks associated with spreadsheets, and providing a better return on investment based on usage."

"You can bring in data from any source and from multiple sources, and you can consolidate that data in HFM."

"It is a very user-friendly software."

"The most valuable feature is the flexibility and ease of configuration in terms of testing and formula creation."

"The tool is stable."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Financial consolidation and reporting tool with good built-in features such as currency exchange and elimination."

"I rate the overall solution nine out of ten."

"Functionality-wise, it is what they say it is. It is the best in class, but it all ties back to your users. If your users are completely enamored with Excel spreadsheets, then breaking those habits is hard."

"This product is very scalable and provides high ROI."

"The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel."

"Scalability isn't a problem for Hyperion."

"The tool is very scalable and powerful. It helps us with financial reporting and performance reporting. It is a very good tool for consolidation and budgeting. We are dependent on it for reporting."

"We like the reporting and tracking of financials."

"We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

Cons

"It's a difficult process to try to edit, configure, or change the business rules that exist and work within HFM."

"In terms of improvement, one challenge with Oracle HFM is the need for technical knowledge in writing SQL syntax for custom extensions."

"The solution has integration challenges. We need a simple tool that is fool-proof for the data that is submitted not only for consolidation purposes but also for performance management and reporting purposes."

"The intercompany reporting function in this tool needs improvement, particularly being able to run reports in batches, rather than one at a time."

"The complexity is okay. I don't see it as super complex. The solution could have more functionality to make it a little bit more flexible."

"If there could be data integration between HFM and the accounting software that would be ideal."

"Integration is an area where it lacks and can be improved."

"Improvements can be made by possibly different interfaces to modernize it, more automation in scripting, and better integration with third-party solutions and reporting capabilities."

"Configuration is a little complex, it's not very easy. The solution is integrated with Essbase and there are not many users of the Essbase database. If they can provide different modules for each subject area, like supply chain, for inventory forecasting or for order management forecasting, it would make each subject area easier to manage."

"Oracle Hyperion generally it's quite a complex architecture that is hard to maintain."

"The Oracle technical support in our area is terrible."

"It is challenging to do reporting on Oracle Hyperion if you're not an expert."

"All the planning systems out there are great. It doesn't matter which company you use. They're all great. I've seen demonstrations on a number of them, but it all boils down to the culture within the organization itself to use that functionality, understand it, and help drive it. I've had Oracle salespeople do demonstrations, and it looked really good. We get it on board, and everybody still sticks to their Excel spreadsheets because companies are a lot more complex than what you could deliver on the planning system. So, there should be more education on the capabilities, and there should be more understanding of organizations in terms of the way they access the data in order to plan."

"The forecasting of values could be simplified in this solution."

"I have a problem with Hyperion when I need to log some changes in the budget. It's hard to know who made which changes in the budget."

"This solution's stability is a little problematic."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle Hyperion Financial Management (HFM) uses the named user licensing model. There's different pricing depending on HFM and Essbase planning."

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

"To get a full license, which gives you access to most of the different Hyperion programs, it costs $2000 to $2500 a month."

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"The solution is affordable."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle HFM?

The most valuable feature is the flexibility and ease of configuration in terms of testing and formula creation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle HFM?

It depends on the discount offered by Oracle. It is an expensive product but delivers what it promises, ensuring regulatory compliance, reducing risks associated with spreadsheets, and providing a ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle HFM?

Improvements can be made by possibly different interfaces to modernize it, more automation in scripting, and better integration with third-party solutions and reporting capabilities.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

We are going to re-implement the Oracle Hyperion system due to changes in our chart of account process and some other factors. We were analyzing whether to move to a cloud system, EPM Cloud. We hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

We are using Oracle Financials and Oracle Hyperion. Oracle Hyperion is used for budget and MIS reporting, while Financials is used for financial accounting, payables, receivables, and general ledge...

See all answers

Comparisons

CCH Tagetik vs Oracle HFM

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Oracle HFM

Compared 10% of the time

OneStream XF vs Oracle HFM

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Cognos vs Oracle HFM

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs Oracle HFM

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle HFM Competitors

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 15% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 9% of the time

Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Business Planning and Consolidation vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle HFM

August 2025

Download Oracle HFM product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

August 2025

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Also Known As

HFM

Hyperion

Overview

Oracle Hyperion Financial Management is a financial consolidation and reporting application built with advanced Web technology. It provides financial managers the ability to rapidly consolidate and report financial results, meet global regulatory requirements, reduce the cost of compliance and deliver confidence in the numbers.

Oracle

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

Sample Customers

B&B Hotels, Goldwind, Drake & Scull

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle HFM vs. Oracle Hyperion

July 2025

Free Report: Oracle HFM vs. Oracle Hyperion

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle HFM vs. Oracle Hyperion and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle HFM vs. Oracle Hyperion report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.