Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Hyperion vs SAP Business Planning and Consolidation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Hyperion
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (1st)
SAP Business Planning and C...
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Financial Performance and Strategy Management (4th), Financial Close Software (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Oracle Hyperion and SAP Business Planning and Consolidation aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Oracle Hyperion is designed for Business Performance Management and holds a mindshare of 5.5%, down 12.1% compared to last year.
SAP Business Planning and Consolidation, on the other hand, focuses on Financial Performance and Strategy Management, holds 7.6% mindshare, down 8.5% since last year.
Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Oracle Hyperion5.5%
Anaplan7.4%
CCH Tagetik5.7%
Other81.4%
Business Performance Management
Financial Performance and Strategy Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Business Planning and Consolidation7.6%
Adaptive Insights9.3%
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud7.2%
Other75.9%
Financial Performance and Strategy Management
 

Q&A Highlights

Oct 06, 2017
 

Featured Reviews

SC
Product Support Engineer at JSW
Empower financial planning with user-friendly and robust features
The best features of Oracle Hyperion revolve around their cloud-based technology, which is gradually moving to cloud solutions such as EPMCSG, while Anaplan uses two engines for calculations, the classic engine and the Essbase engine. Anaplan allows for quick module changes, where adjustments in one module reflect throughout the user experience. In contrast, Oracle Hyperion relies on Essbase as a database with calculation scripts and business rules, and it incorporates Smart View technology for Excel connections, providing a familiar interface for users. Oracle Hyperion is fundamentally a good technology and does not require significant improvements compared to other technologies because it is user-friendly and offers several advantages in financial reporting and consolidation. However, I have observed that Anaplan has built-in UX pages for report preparation, unlike Oracle Hyperion, which often relies on third-party tools such as Hyperion Financial Reporting and Power BI for reporting.
it_user90087 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
​​It's a robust solution with no issues​. In my view, it is necessary to introduce another way to create reports apart from MS Excel.
There are no tutorials or wizards inside the tool, and I think they would be very useful sometimes. Having said that, I suspect that it is one of the SAP's strategies, because they get a lot of money from SAP training and don't want people learning who to work with their products on their own. There is another thing as well which could be improved. In my view, it is necessary to introduce another way to create reports apart from MS Excel, and it must be a way that can be exploited through mobile devices as well.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

Oct 6, 2017
Oct 6, 2017
The only reason to consider BPC at this point is if you are locked into an SAP architecture. SAP is re-architecting BPC to utilize their HANA memory-resident database, which is basically a heart-lung transplant - long, costly and complex. BPC is also known as one of the most costly CPM implementations in the market, which is not likely to get better as SAP rejiggers it for HANA. Hyperion Plann...
2 out of 7 answers
it_user490053 - PeerSpot reviewer
EPM & Analytics Consultant at a consultancy
Oct 2, 2017
Depends. In terms of functionality, they both do similar things. I'm sure a lot of users can give you a long list of pros and cons of both, but the choice often comes down to what works well in your environment. The best way to find out is by getting your hands on it and try a proof of concept. I would start by defining exactly what you will be using it for, you may find that lighter weight cloud CPM solutions may be a better fit and with a faster deployement.
it_user199395 - PeerSpot reviewer
Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Oct 2, 2017
A choice between two vendors rarely comes down to the tool (software) itself. This is usually because they both have strong selling points that got you to thus point. I have not used thesee two personally but offer you thus advise. 1. If you have the time request a demo based in what you leadership team would need to see. Never accept the canned demo which shows the app in the best possible light. Use your data if possible. 2. An application is only as good as its usefulness to its users. I have bought great software and no one really used it. So again whatever the choice ensure that you get the buy-in from your user community. 3. Let the vendor explain how they can fill the gap between your expectations and the app capabilities (always is something ). 4. Ensure that you will be able to access the needed support post implementation. This will allow for the continued success of the app use. Lastly trust your gut and spend time doing the research and asking the questions. Noone else does it like you and your team is depending on you to paint a way forward. Remember it's just a tool. Right now you got it down to 2. So review the above and take your shot. Good luck, let me know how it works out. Regards, Andrew
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise38
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?
We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.
What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?
We are going to re-implement the Oracle Hyperion system due to changes in our chart of account process and some other factors. We were analyzing whether to move to a cloud system, EPM Cloud. We hav...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?
We are using Oracle Financials and Oracle Hyperion. Oracle Hyperion is used for budget and MIS reporting, while Financials is used for financial accounting, payables, receivables, and general ledge...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Hyperion
SAP BPC
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.
Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Anaplan, Domo and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.