Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Oracle HFM Logo

Top 10 Oracle HFM Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Oracle HFM Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle HFM based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, and Workiva Wdesk. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Oracle HFM Logo
Anaplan
4.0 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
Anaplan
4.0 out of 5
Oracle HFM offers powerful consolidation and compliance for financial reporting. In comparison, Anaplan provides flexible modeling and scenario planning. Oracle HFM requires significant deployment resources, while Anaplan's cloud-based model ensures quick setup. Anaplan offers subscription pricing, whereas Oracle HFM involves a higher initial investment.
Download Anaplan vs. Oracle HFM Report
Oracle HFM has a considerable setup cost focusing on large enterprises, while Anaplan offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup suited for various business sizes.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle HFM has a considerable setup cost focusing on large enterprises, while Anaplan offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup suited for various business sizes.
Oracle HFM Logo
Oracle HFM Logo
IBM Planning Analytics
4.2 out of 5
IBM Planning Analytics excels in flexibility and integration, ideal for dynamic analytics. In comparison, Oracle HFM is preferred for financial consolidation and compliance. IBM Planning Analytics offers scalable cloud deployment, while Oracle HFM provides customizable infrastructure for enhanced control.
Download IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle HFM Report
IBM Planning Analytics offers a more straightforward setup process, while Oracle HFM involves higher initial costs and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Planning Analytics offers a more straightforward setup process, while Oracle HFM involves higher initial costs and complexity.
Oracle HFM Logo
Workiva Wdesk
3.5 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
Workiva Wdesk
3.5 out of 5
Oracle HFM offers robust financial consolidation and precision, appealing to those with complex financial needs. In comparison, Workiva Wdesk emphasizes collaboration and ease of deployment, ideal for teams seeking efficient document management and responsive support in a user-friendly environment.
Download Oracle HFM vs. Workiva Wdesk Report
Oracle HFM has a substantial initial setup cost, while Workiva Wdesk offers a more flexible pricing approach, highlighting a significant difference in affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle HFM has a substantial initial setup cost, while Workiva Wdesk offers a more flexible pricing approach, highlighting a significant difference in affordability.
Oracle HFM Logo
CCH Tagetik
3.9 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
CCH Tagetik
3.9 out of 5
Oracle HFM attracts businesses with its robust integration and comprehensive consolidation capabilities. In comparison, CCH Tagetik offers advanced planning and budgeting tools, appealing to organizations prioritizing performance management.
Download CCH Tagetik vs. Oracle HFM Report
Oracle HFM typically involves higher setup costs, whereas CCH Tagetik offers a more cost-effective initial investment, highlighting distinct differences in pricing strategy between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle HFM typically involves higher setup costs, whereas CCH Tagetik offers a more cost-effective initial investment, highlighting distinct differences in pricing strategy between the two solutions.
Oracle HFM Logo
Adaptive Insights
4.2 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
Adaptive Insights
4.2 out of 5
Adaptive Insights offers user-friendly interface and flexibility, appealing to those seeking a dynamic solution. In comparison, Oracle HFM excels in integration capabilities for comprehensive functionality. Adaptive Insights provides straightforward deployment, while Oracle HFM delivers advanced features requiring extensive IT involvement.
Download Adaptive Insights vs. Oracle HFM Report
Adaptive Insights typically offers a lower setup cost compared to Oracle HFM, where the initial investment can be significantly higher, making Adaptive Insights a more budget-friendly option for companies with limited resources.
View comparison
Pricing
Adaptive Insights typically offers a lower setup cost compared to Oracle HFM, where the initial investment can be significantly higher, making Adaptive Insights a more budget-friendly option for companies with limited resources.
Oracle HFM Logo
OneStream XF
4.7 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
OneStream XF
4.7 out of 5
Oracle HFM emphasizes compliance and accuracy with robust financial consolidation, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, OneStream XF offers a unified platform with financial consolidation, planning, and analytics, preferred for its cloud-based deployment and flexibility, providing scalable solutions with efficient updates.
Download OneStream XF vs. Oracle HFM Report
Oracle HFM has a higher setup cost compared to OneStream XF, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle HFM has a higher setup cost compared to OneStream XF, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses between the two solutions.
Oracle HFM Logo
Longview Analytics
3.6 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
Longview Analytics
3.6 out of 5
Longview Analytics offers strong dashboard capabilities and accessible financial data, appealing to analytics-focused enterprises. In comparison, Oracle HFM provides advanced consolidation features valuable for complex financial environments, despite requiring a higher initial investment for extensive management solutions.
Download Longview Analytics vs. Oracle HFM Report
Longview Analytics offers competitive setup costs, whereas Oracle HFM tends to be higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Longview Analytics offers competitive setup costs, whereas Oracle HFM tends to be higher.
Oracle HFM Logo
Planful
4.0 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
Planful
4.0 out of 5
Oracle HFM offers robust financial consolidation and compliance features tailored for global enterprise needs. In comparison, Planful emphasizes usability and flexibility with dynamic planning and dashboards, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions with straightforward deployment and responsive customer service.
Download Oracle HFM vs. Planful Report
Oracle HFM has a significantly higher setup cost compared to Planful, which offers a more budget-friendly option for businesses seeking robust financial management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle HFM has a significantly higher setup cost compared to Planful, which offers a more budget-friendly option for businesses seeking robust financial management solutions.
Oracle HFM Logo
Prophix
4.1 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
Prophix
4.1 out of 5
Prophix excels in ease of deployment, offering powerful budgeting and forecasting with a focus on flexibility and quick ROI. In comparison, Oracle HFM provides advanced financial consolidation and customization, making it ideal for large organizations with complex financial systems requiring comprehensive capabilities.
Download Oracle HFM vs. Prophix Report
Prophix offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Oracle HFM, making it a cost-effective choice. Meanwhile, Oracle HFM's setup is pricier but reflects its comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Prophix offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Oracle HFM, making it a cost-effective choice. Meanwhile, Oracle HFM's setup is pricier but reflects its comprehensive capabilities.
Oracle HFM Logo
QPR Metrics
4.3 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
QPR Metrics
4.3 out of 5
QPR Metrics is ideal for affordability and customer service with easy deployment. In comparison, Oracle HFM offers robust functionality with comprehensive financial management tools, appealing to those prioritizing sophisticated analytics despite higher costs and complex deployment.
Download Oracle HFM vs. QPR Metrics Report
QPR Metrics offers lower setup costs, while Oracle HFM presents higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
QPR Metrics offers lower setup costs, while Oracle HFM presents higher initial expenses.
Oracle HFM Logo
IBM Controller
4.0 out of 5
Oracle HFM Logo
IBM Controller
4.0 out of 5
IBM Cognos Controller supports the close, consolidation and reporting process with the agility and affordability of a cloud-based solution. It enables finance teams to automate and accelerate the financial close with minimal IT support. It also helps finance teams deliver financial results, create informative financial and management reports and provide the chief financial officer (CFO) with an enterprise view of key financial ratios and metrics.
View comparison

Related categories

Business Performance Management
Production Planning
Predictive Analytics