Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SAS Activity-Based Management Logo

SAS Activity-Based Management Reviews

Vendor: SAS
2.5 out of 5

What is SAS Activity-Based Management?

Featured SAS Activity-Based Management reviews

SAS Activity-Based Management mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of SAS Activity-Based Management in the Business Performance Management category stands at 2.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAS Activity-Based Management2.5%
Anaplan7.1%
Board5.0%
Other85.4%
Business Performance Management
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Service and Support

Stability

 
SAS Activity-Based Management Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
CEO at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees2.0No summary available
Data Scientist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees1.5I found this software useful for specific accounting projects, helping clarify true costs. But, its poor interface, difficult installation, and limited vendor support make it challenging, requiring substantial IT resources to deploy.
Optimization Consultant with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0I value its complex Activity Based Cost calculation ability. However, usability is poor, with illogical constraints and stability issues like reboots. We're considering programming its calculation function into SQL Server.
Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees2.5I find cube generation valuable, but this solution needs simplification and transparency as it often feels like a black box. I've experienced stability and scalability issues, although customer and technical support are good.
Performance Management/VP at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees3.5I found SAS ABM/EG valuable for expense allocation and ETL, appreciating its traceability. However, I experienced performance issues with large data, IT security conflicts, and miss the OLAP drilling feature. Customer service was mixed.