OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Zeenyx AscentialTest are competitors in automated testing solutions. Zeenyx AscentialTest has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, despite possible higher costs, while OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is favorable in pricing and customer support.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers integrates seamlessly with OpenText platforms, offers robust test automation capabilities, and supports record technology effectively. Zeenyx AscentialTest is known for its ease of use in test creation without scripting, cross-browser and device testing, and powerful object recognition.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve by expanding integration options beyond OpenText platforms, enhancing cross-platform support, and simplifying user interface elements. Zeenyx AscentialTest could benefit from simplified pricing models, increased integration capabilities with third-party tools, and reducing the complexity of initial setup processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers straightforward deployment for existing OpenText users, known for responsive customer support. Zeenyx AscentialTest provides a user-friendly installation process, focuses on minimizing downtime during setup, and efficient support services.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is competitively priced with low initial investment leading to a quicker ROI. Zeenyx AscentialTest, while higher in setup costs, delivers favorable ROI through extensive features, offering long-term testing efficiency benefits.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| Zeenyx AscentialTest | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
