OpenText Application Quality Management and Zeenyx AscentialTest compete in the application testing domain. Zeenyx offers a more compelling package for complex testing needs due to its advanced automation features.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers features such as extensive integration with enterprise applications, a robust test management framework, and a comprehensive defect tracking system. Zeenyx AscentialTest stands out with its powerful automated testing capabilities, user-friendly script generation feature, and reusable test steps that enhance testing efficiency.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve by simplifying its complex integration processes, enhancing its user interface for better usability, and offering more flexible automation options. Zeenyx could benefit from expanding its integration capabilities with various enterprise applications, providing more detailed analytics and reporting features, and enhancing support for non-Windows platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest provides a straightforward deployment model and responsive customer service, ensuring a smoother initial setup. OpenText Application Quality Management, while feature-rich, may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive integration features and may benefit from more customer support during the deployment phase.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive integration features, while Zeenyx AscentialTest presents a more cost-effective entry point with promising long-term ROI driven by its automation efficiency. While OpenText's pricing may align better with larger enterprises seeking extensive integration, Zeenyx offers a more accessible pricing model leading to quicker ROI.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 8.2% |
| Zeenyx AscentialTest | 1.5% |
| Other | 90.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 162 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
