Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Identity and Access Management vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Identity and Acces...
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
27th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (31st)
Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (5th), Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of OpenText Identity and Access Management is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 11.6%, down from 12.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use OpenText Identity and Access Management?
Share your opinion
Artsiom Mkrtychan - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly stable tool offering extremely helpful technical support to its users
It's a very scalable tool because it allows those working on it to work with clusters, especially if we discuss PingFederate's horizontal scalability. One can use any number of nodes needed, but usually, two or three nodes are enough during the production phase. For how the solution has been set up and programmed, I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten. Owing to an NDA that my company has signed, I can't disclose the exact number of my company's customers who use the solution, but I can say that many use the solution, and it goes more than 50 in number.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
18%
University
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about PingID?
The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?
The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
What needs improvement with PingID?
The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
 

Also Known As

Covisint Identity Platform, OpenText IAM
Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ally, BlueCross, BlueShield, Shell, BorgWarner, Carlson Wagonlit Travel, Cisco, Daimler, Delphi, Faurecia, Ford, GM, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Mitsubishi, On, Worthington Industries
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: May 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.