OpenText Service Management (SMAX) vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL] comparison

OpenText Service Management (SMAX) and OpenText Service Manager [EOL] are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. Additionally, 83% of OpenText Service Management (SMAX) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of OpenText Service Manager [EOL] users who would recommend it.

OpenText Service Management...

Read 6 OpenText Service Management (SMAX) reviews

835 Views
349 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Read 48 OpenText Service Manager [EOL] reviews

79% willing to recommend

OpenText Service Management...

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Service Manager [EOL] and OpenText Service Management (SMAX) compete in IT service management. SMAX has the upper hand with its advanced capabilities and adaptability to business needs.

Features: OpenText Service Manager [EOL] offers comprehensive ITIL v3 support, change management, and incident management. SMAX provides AI-driven technology, low-code customization, and enhanced flexibility and scalability to streamline operations. SMAX also includes natural language processing and virtual chatbots, improving user interaction.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Service Manager [EOL] could benefit from improved cloud compatibility, a more modern user interface, and enhanced automation options. SMAX could improve by offering more intuitive interfaces, simplifying its configuration capabilities, and providing better integration with legacy systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Service Manager [EOL] demands significant on-premise infrastructure, which complicates deployment but offers reliable customer support. SMAX simplifies deployment through its cloud-based model, ensuring quick integration and efficient updates, accompanied by robust customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Service Manager [EOL] requires a significant initial investment, with manageable ongoing costs and steady ROI. SMAX has a higher upfront cost, justified by its innovative features and cloud capabilities, leading to reduced maintenance costs and improved operational effectiveness over time.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Service Management (ITSM) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Service Management...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (14th)

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Evgeniy Kolotilov

Managing Director at Intracom Telecom Ukraine

Offers a range of tools for sales and configuration that can be used in banks and telecom companies

The deployment takes three months. In this process, customers need to allocate resources like networks, data storage, and images. They then need to decide which business functions they intend to use in production and perform some basic configurations. Custom documentation is prepared and provided for user renewals and administration. I would rate the experience of the initial setup a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Farah Ben Ahmed

DLO Veritas Backup solution Project Manager at Tunisie Telecom

Is easy to set up, but customization needs improvement

Sometimes, customization is simple. The version we are using now has a nice interface Customization can be difficult at times because scripting is often required. I've been using this solution for ten years. Generally, it's stable, but sometimes we see behavior that we cannot understand. It's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product provides an interface for the end users to make requests."

"The tool is very easy to use."

"It offers a range of tools for sales and configuration. It's like a business process improvement platform, suitable for various lines of business operations."

"The most valuable features of Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX) are that it is user-friendly, easy to configure, and adaptable."

"This is a cordless application that can be used throughout any organization."

"OpenText Service Management Automation X provides valuable features such as topic analytics for incident and problem management. It also includes natural language processing for analyzing technical descriptions. Additionally, it features a virtual chatbot capable of processing natural language to interact effectively with end users. This service enhances customer support and is not subject to the limitations often found in offerings from other vendors."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Service Manager's best features are flexibility and customizability."

"It helps to register things, to see the changing parts, and to correlate incidents."

"Sometimes, customization is simple. The version we are using now has a nice interface."

"The workflow engine that standardizes and globalizes the process steps. It drives people through the process by standardization and automation."

"Technical support is pretty good."

"It's easy to scale."

"Service Manager does what it should, but it's quite outdated."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] pros

Cons

"The tool has negatively impacted our productivity."

"The solution lacks sufficient documentation."

"The initial setup of Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX) is complicated, but once it is set up the configuration is straightforward to adapt to the users' or customers' needs."

"The product's connectivity with third-party products is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The contract management feature can be improved."

"We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system."

"Service Manager is at the end of its life. The architecture, performance, and look are all way behind."

"There should be some front desk provided or some options to let our users serve themselves, because we have about 5000 servers and 400 applications."

"Micro Focus Service Manager is not very great. It would be better if it had more features. When it comes to features, BMC tops the chart. When it comes to usage, people use BMC more."

"It needs good integration with the configuration database, that's lacking at the moment, It's not that good."

"With the new version moving toward the codeless configuration is good, but it's losing flexibility."

"Customization can be difficult at times because scripting is often required."

"I think one area which is the most painful from my point of view is if you need to integrate a lot of the tools, and being able to make that a lot more seamless."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the license for SMAX varies depending on the configuration, including the number of seats for users and the customer's specific requirements. It's not a fixed cost and can vary."

"The solution is somewhat cheaper than the competitors."

"I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."

"The license is not cheap."

"Micro Focus Service Manager is a little cheaper than other options. You have to pay a monthly subscription fee."

"I pay for Service Manager on a yearly basis, and the price is reasonable - I would rate it five out of ten."

"HP Service Manager has moderate pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX)?

The tool is very easy to use.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX)?

The solution is used for the end-user portal. It is used for incident management, requests, and other informational purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX)?

The tool is appropriate if we don't have a complicated use case. It is the right tool for simple use cases. It's a lot cheaper than ServiceNow. It is an appropriate tool for a smaller business or m...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Service Manager?

The initial setup is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Service Manager?

The product's technical support services need improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Service Manager?

We use the product for infrastructure, profile, and incident management.

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs OpenText Service Management (SMAX)

Compared 36% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs OpenText Service Management (SMAX)

Compared 21% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs OpenText Service Management (SMAX)

Compared 19% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs OpenText Service Management (SMAX)

Compared 11% of the time

HaloITSM vs OpenText Service Management (SMAX)

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Service Management (SMAX) Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

June 2025

OpenText Service Management (SMAX) report

Download OpenText Service Management (SMAX) product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

June 2025

Download OpenText Service Manager [EOL] product report

Also Known As

OpenText Service Manager, Micro Focus Service Management Automation X (SMAX)

Micro Focus Service Manager, HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager

Interactive Demo

OpenText

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

OpenText Service Management Automation X delivers efficient service management automation with user-friendly configurability across IT, IoT, HR, and finance sectors. It enhances business processes through integrated incident management and natural language processing with virtual chatbots.

OpenText SMAX blends user-friendly design with broad language support and robust storage. It enables organizations to deploy in both on-premise and cloud environments using Kubernetes. SMAX excels in business process improvement, incident management, and uses intelligent agents for autonomous alerts and issue resolution. However, it requires enhancements in integration capabilities and documentation, third-party product connectivity, and contract management. Users face challenges with process automation and search functionality, demanding greater customization and flexibility.

What are the key features of OpenText SMAX?

User-Friendliness: Simplifies service management across departments.
Configurability: Allows customization to meet specific needs.
Adaptability: Effective across IT, IoT, HR, and finance.
Language Support: Broad language capabilities for diverse users.
Storage Capabilities: Efficient and reliable data management.
Process Improvement: Tools for streamlining business operations.
Incident Management: Effective handling and resolution of issues.
Natural Language Processing: Chatbots that enhance customer support.
Automation: Facilitates seamless logistics and service catalog management.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines service management processes.
Improved Customer Support: Virtual chatbots provide superior assistance.
Scalability: Adaptable to growing business needs.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Employee Onboarding: Simplifies and accelerates onboarding processes.

Banks and telecom companies primarily employ OpenText SMAX for service management automation, leveraging its ESM and ITSM capabilities. Deployed on-premise and via cloud, organizations in regions such as Saudi Arabia focus on integrations and upgrades, using SMAX as an end-user portal for incident management.

OpenText

Service Manager on SaaS provides you with a cloud-based, industry leading IT Service Management solution.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Zurich Airport, Envirosuite, Norsk Helsenett, Achmea, University of Milan, World Vision, Petroleum Development Oman, Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories (TJDFT).

resultspositive, Globicon

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.