OpenText SiteScope vs Sentry comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.2, while Sentry is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

OpenText SiteScope

Read 29 OpenText SiteScope reviews

6,368 Views
5,986 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 14 Sentry reviews

9,784 Views
9,197 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and Sentry are both robust monitoring solutions focused on different needs. OpenText SiteScope has the upper hand in comprehensive monitoring capabilities, while Sentry stands out for its agile error tracking and ease of use.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope provides wide monitoring capabilities, covering infrastructure, applications, and services. Sentry offers exceptional error tracking, seamless integration capabilities, and intuitive use.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope requires enhancements in interface simplicity, reporting capabilities, and customization options. Sentry needs improved performance monitoring features, enhanced alerting mechanisms, and more robust error tracking.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope’s deployment can be complex due to its extensive configurations, with users noting responsive customer service but a steep learning curve. Sentry’s deployment is straightforward with supportive customer service, ensuring a smoother onboarding experience.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope represents a higher initial investment, justified by its extensive capabilities, offering substantial long-term ROI. Sentry is a more cost-effective solution, particularly beneficial for smaller teams, providing quick returns with its efficient error monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 1.4%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText SiteScope	1.3%
Sentry	1.4%
Other	97.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Proactive monitoring has reduced response time and has improved capacity planning accuracy

Regarding areas for improvement, there may be minor issues, but I have not faced any significant issues with OpenText SiteScope because I have a team that uses this product daily. As a monitoring dashboard user, I do not have any negative feedback. A feature that could be added is direct integration with a ticketing tool, as it would help operation teams directly detect alarms and alerts happening in our infrastructure. Direct integration with a ticketing tool such as Remedy would be a good feature. OpenText SiteScope has some limitations, especially with integration between OpenText SiteScope and Remedy, which must be done through middle software. There are also limitations for cloud monitoring as well as for Docker and Kubernetes.

Read full review

NelsonMendaros1

Founding Member at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Real-time error tracking assists the QA team in swiftly identifying and reporting bugs

One of the greatest advantages of Sentry is its support for Azure Web Services, which New Relic does not support. Sentry integrates with common developer communication platforms like Discord and WhatsApp, which allows developers to easily track notifications and findings in the applications. Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration."

"The product's readymade templates are perfect. It supports us a lot when we don't have much experience with the product. The templates offers us direction to proceed."

"I would rate the stability of OpenText SiteScope as excellent."

"They can create workflows for approval processes, which is very useful to support paperless digitalization, allowing effective collaboration between many parties including approvers, reviewers, and engineering documents being signed, annotated, and marked up using this system."

"It has multiple monitors that can be deployed OOTB, which includes basic system monitors for CPU, Disk, Memory, NIC's, etc."

"The products have been able to deliver the service to our business, which is to ensure that the applications that depend on our servers are always available."

"The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring."

"The tool has capabilities other than managing web-based applications, like URL Monitor and EPI Script. It is also easy to use the tool."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

"The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

"Sentry breaks everything down in real time."

"Sentry allowed us to be more proactive and also enhance your app's observability, and its native integrations with JIRA and Slack saved us precious time."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create and assign rules and give access to particular users."

"Tracking error logs is a great feature because Sentry provides a rich context with regards to the code and tracing issues across the entire stack with trace logs and things like that."

"Sentry provides excellent security when it comes to tables and databases."

"Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs."

"The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"We'll probably remove SiteScope shortly because we've been using another monitoring tool in production. SiteScope is just not something we use very much of any more."

"We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope."

"Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test."

"OpenText SiteScope has some limitations, especially with integration between OpenText SiteScope and Remedy, which must be done through middle software."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

"In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution."

"The installation was a bit of a challenge. It took us almost two weeks to get it up and running."

"I would be very interested in having transaction traceability included in the product, to give us a better view of what is really going wrong in a particular method and action."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

"While using Sentry I have to manually create an issue when it occurs by clicking in Jira or GitLab."

"Sentry is more like an application mind trying APM platforms as opposed to also tracking analytics and things like that."

"The log centralization and analysis could be improved in Sentry."

"The integration could be improved, and the price could be lowered."

"I would like to see the ability to customize events and get more metrics for these customized events."

"I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release."

"The settings for an administrator are complex."

"Additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area of improvement."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

OpenText SiteScope has a lot of use cases including monitoring websites, monitoring URLs, monitoring infrastructure resources like CPU, hard disk, and memory usage, and customized monitoring script...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

Sentry is very affordable. We spend less than $200 to $300 a month. Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

Right now, Sentry meets our needs and we have not encountered any bottlenecks. However, additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sentry?

We use Sentry for application performance management and tracking bugs and issues in the application.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

Stackify vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 7% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 6% of the time

SigNoz vs Sentry

Compared 6% of the time

Honeycomb Enterprise vs Sentry

Compared 4% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

October 2026

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download Sentry product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

No data available

Overview

OpenText SiteScope provides agentless monitoring of infrastructure and applications, offering an intuitive experience with comprehensive solutions for managing APIs, URLs, and log files. It's designed for those seeking ease of use and flexibility without the need for server agents.

SiteScope is known for its agentless architecture that facilitates seamless monitoring across a range of technologies including AWS, VMware, and APIs. Users benefit from ready-to-use templates and an intuitive dashboard. Despite its flexibility, SiteScope has challenges with integration and modern features like cloud and DevOps monitoring. The Java interface is slow and setup can be cumbersome, with costly licensing and room for improvement in reporting and scalability.

What are the key features of OpenText SiteScope?

Agentless Architecture: Eliminates the need for server agents, minimizing intrusion.
Ready-to-Use Templates: Simplifies monitoring setup across different environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports server, database, URL, and API monitoring.
Integration Capabilities: Works with AWS, VMware, and other technologies.
Intuitive Dashboard: Provides easy-to-understand data visualization.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Cost Efficiency: Agentless setup reduces operational costs.
Flexibility: Supports multiple technologies and environments.
Time Management: Predefined templates save setup time.
Performance Assurance: Ensures consistent performance with synthetic monitoring.
Operational Insight: Enhances decision-making through comprehensive data visualization.

OpenText SiteScope is implemented in industries like healthcare and government organizations for maintaining system performance and uptime. It supports monitoring across platforms, including Linux, Windows, and VMware, enabling users to address infrastructure and application monitoring needs without agent-related challenges.

OpenText

Sentry is a robust error management system known for real-time error tracking and integration with tools like Slack, GitLab, and Jira, benefiting those seeking comprehensive application performance insights.

Sentry offers a seamless platform to monitor errors in both front-end and back-end applications, providing real-time alerts and comprehensive event log context. With its integration capabilities, teams effectively track application metrics and access performance data without direct production access, ensuring enhanced reliability. Sentry's features such as event grouping and code trace logs linked to Git repositories highlight its utility in maintaining application efficiency. Enhanced security and regular updates make it a preferred choice over competitors. Despite some requests for improvements in automation and UI enhancements, Sentry remains invaluable for error management and application performance monitoring.

What are the key features of Sentry?

Integration capabilities: Connects with Slack, GitLab, Jira, AWS Lambda.
Real-time error tracking: Alerts users instantly about errors.
Event grouping: Groups related errors for easier management.
Code trace logs: Provides detailed trace logs linked to Git repositories.
Comprehensive context: Offers a complete view of events and context.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Sentry?

Enhanced reliability: Provides critical insights for robust application performance.
Accessibility: Easy deployment and quick adaptation make it user-friendly.
Security: Maintains high security standards with timely updates.
Utility in error management: Detects silent failures, aiding ETL processes.
Cost efficiency: Favored over alternatives like New Relic due to comprehensive features.

In industries like technology, Sentry is crucial for monitoring errors in web applications, offering real-time alerts and performance tracking. It is frequently used in ETL processes to detect failures without direct developer access, benefiting teams who manage large-scale applications and databases efficiently.

Sentry

Sample Customers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

November 2026

Free Report: OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.