Oracle Hyperion vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

Oracle and Workiva are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.3, while Workiva is ranked #12 with an average rating of 6.8. Oracle holds a 10.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to Workiva’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

Oracle Hyperion

Read 56 Oracle Hyperion reviews

2,386 Views
1,546 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

506 Views
311 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle Hyperion and Workiva Wdesk are competing enterprise performance management and financial reporting products. Hyperion seems to have the upper hand in data management and complex financial analytics, while Workiva Wdesk excels in user-friendliness and collaboration.

Features: Oracle Hyperion provides advanced analytics, data integration, and scalable architecture suitable for large enterprises with complex requirements. Its valuable features include comprehensive data management tools, intricate financial analytics, and robust calculation power. Workiva Wdesk emphasizes collaborative document control, cloud-based reporting, and compliance management. Key features include automated reporting schedules, dynamic data updates, and seamless ERP integration.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Hyperion could enhance user-friendliness, simplify deployment, and improve its user interface for easier accessibility. Workiva Wdesk may benefit from further integration capabilities, expanded analytical features, and enhanced data security measures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Hyperion generally requires a detailed setup and significant IT support, offering substantial capabilities post-deployment. Workiva Wdesk supports quicker deployment and updates due to its cloud-based model and is noted for providing responsive customer support and guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Hyperion involves higher initial setup costs and a longer ROI period, fitting for large organizations needing detailed financial solutions. Workiva Wdesk offers a more favorable pricing structure for mid-sized organizations, enabling faster ROI with lower deployment costs and efficient reporting.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Hyperion vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion vs. Workiva Wdesk

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in Business Performance Management

12th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (4th), Financial Close Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 10.7%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 3.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at Infosys

Automation of financial processes streamlines operations but pricing needs improvement

Our clients mostly use Hyperion for their financial requirements, including budgeting, forecasting, and planning The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel. The workflow management of planning and the…

Read full review

Phillip Gough

Partner, Financial Services at Deloitte TT

The solution is easy to deploy and enables collaboration, but it must improve its speed and enable users to create pivot tables

I rate the ease of setup an eight out of ten. The initial setup was straightforward. The solution is cloud-based. We deployed the product along with Wdata in six months. It was for a lot of use cases. To deploy the tool, we designed the use cases and developed them. Then, we went through unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests. It was an Agile delivery cycle.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is very scalable and powerful. It helps us with financial reporting and performance reporting. It is a very good tool for consolidation and budgeting. We are dependent on it for reporting."

"Stable and scalable solution with a valuable data integration feature which allows the slicing and dicing of data. It also has a workforce planning feature that allows you to bring in your HR data."

"Smart View is a really useful tool because we can have a good API with HFM."

"We like the reporting and tracking of financials."

"Oracle Hyperion is fairly user-friendly and not too complicated. The forecasting, it's really good. It's sometimes slow when there are a lot of users using it and we can have up to approximately 300 users using it. However, you can do it in Excel because there's an Excel add-in. This is a benefit because a lot of people do this way instead of having to go into the planning application itself."

"It is easy to use. It is very intuitive. Even though there is a lot of functionality that comes out of the box, you can customize the solutions to meet your needs. You have the ability to have business rules that produce all kinds of calculations. We're international, and we do all our FX conversions through that."

"We have found there is excellent stability with Oracle Hyperion."

"The tool's most valuable feature of the solution is flexibility and integration capabilities."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

Cons

"I found the initial setup to be complex."

"Hyperion has much room for improvement, especially disaster recovery. You don't have the option to choose the proper disaster recovery method. We have Hyperion and an SQL server on the backend. We have active solutions for the backend database server, which aren't working for our people. They've asked us to remove the high availability to increase application performance."

"This solution's stability is a little problematic."

"The pricing model could be more flexible as it's more expensive than its competitors."

"Integrating Oracle Hyperion, a multidimensional database, with relational databases poses challenges due to the differing database structures."

"They could support machine learning algorithms for the product."

"Oracle EPM Cloud solutions have simplified the security model. Nevertheless, it would be better having a more differentiated security model."

"The pricing model could be more flexible as it's more expensive than its competitors."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

"The speed must be improved."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for licensing yearly."

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."

"To get a full license, which gives you access to most of the different Hyperion programs, it costs $2000 to $2500 a month."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"The solution is affordable."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

19%

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

Pricing is a significant concern. After moving to PBCS and EPBCS, the per-user license fees can be reduced, particularly for bulk users. For example, a company with fifty users versus five hundred ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

I use Oracle Hyperion ( /products/oracle-hyperion-reviews ) for summarizing data from our ERP ( /categories/erp ) system to gain insights into company performance, such as revenue and profit for a ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Workiva Wdesk?

The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workiva Wdesk?

Wdesk is affordable and as far as I'm aware, there were no additional costs beyond the standard license increase. We didn't have to make any other changes; it primarily involved accessing the platf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 16% of the time

Tableau vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 10% of the time

Adaptive Insights vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 28% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 9% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

May 2025

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

April 2025

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

Hyperion

Wdesk

Overview

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

Optimize your structured and composite reports
Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
Transform processes to enable insight

Workiva

Sample Customers

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion vs. Workiva Wdesk

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle Hyperion vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Hyperion vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Hyperion vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.