Oracle Identity Governance vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

Oracle and RSA are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. Oracle is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5, while RSA is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Oracle holds a 2.2% mindshare in IAM, compared to RSA’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Oracle Identity Governance

Read 71 Oracle Identity Governance reviews

2,390 Views
1,721 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

RSA Identity Governance and...

Read 10 RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle reviews

926 Views
732 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Oracle Identity Governance

RSA Identity Governance and...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and Oracle Identity Governance are competitors in the identity management solutions category. Oracle Identity Governance is known for its comprehensive feature set, while RSA is recognized for better pricing and support, offering a balanced cost-performance ratio.

Features: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle provides strong access management and governance, noteworthy compliance features, and robust policy management. Oracle Identity Governance offers superior scalability and integration capabilities, efficient identity and entitlement management, comprehensive integration with other Oracle products, and extensive user lifecycle management.

Room for Improvement: RSA could expand its feature set and enhance its scalability to match competitor offerings. Improvements in integration with third-party applications could benefit Oracle users. Oracle may address the complex customization processes by simplifying configuration options and improving scalability documentation, whereas RSA might boost advanced integration capabilities and provide more detailed feature documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle enables easy deployment and offers responsive support, allowing for fast implementation. Oracle Identity Governance, while offering extensive customization options that might complicate deployment, is supported by robust documentation and reliable customer service. RSA's quick setup contrasts with Oracle’s more detailed deployment process, though Oracle compensates by providing substantial support services.

Pricing and ROI: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle features competitive pricing and a rapid ROI due to lower initial costs. It attracts financially conscious organizations. Oracle Identity Governance involves higher upfront costs but offers enhanced ROI through its robust features and scalability improvements. RSA excels in cost-effectiveness, offering quicker returns, while Oracle provides greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Identity Governance vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Identity Governance vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Identity Governance

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (8th), Mobile Identity (1st)

RSA Identity Governance and...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of Oracle Identity Governance is 2.2%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Identity Governance	2.2%
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle	1.1%
Other	96.7%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Hasan Afzal

General Manager Technical at Techaccess Pakistan

Comprehensive features and strong support enhance operations

Direct comparison of OIG/OIM/OAM would require several factors to count in. Other than being excellent product, it would be more convenient to have more 3rd party integrations/connectors available for main stream applications (or even databases) that require less development with frequent certifications/version updates (though this cannot be avoided altogether). Single Interface/same screen would be handy. We have not use the product for analytics for anomaly detection, as we had a blend of different products, and identity management wasn't used particularly for this purpose. Oracle suite provides comprehensive Governance The scope of the identity management or Oracle IDM/IAM/OID/OIG is vast, and while we've implemented/evaluated 30-50% of its features, it's not done at full scale to include full-fledged governance/compliance.

Read full review

Harshul Nayak

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features

The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its most valuable feature is its scalability."

"It's a stable and scalable solution."

"What I like most about Oracle Identity Governance is that it is a very flexible tool. It allows you to do any customization on Java as it is built on Java and you can write any customization code using Java. I also like that Oracle Identity Governance is pretty much stable. In my company, there are a lot of users, so my company prefers this solution."

"This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding."

"Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial."

"It is able to save time and money as everything is automated: user access provisioning, password policy management, and reporting."

"Understanding what a customer is using, what they are looking for, and allowing permissions is a challenge. We use the information we get in order to understand the behavior of the customer beyond the security and to understand what they have been doing in the last month. It's a nice way to understand what is attracting the customer and what they are clicking. That could be implemented by using this kind of application."

"What I found most useful in Oracle Identity Governance, feature-wise, are provisioning, de-provisioning, and termination. Those features are very good. Oracle Identity Governance can also be easily integrated with non-Oracle products, which I find valuable."

More Oracle Identity Governance pros

"RSA Identity Governance and lifecycles are good for the access certification and auditing sections."

"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."

"The data collection is excellent and easy to do. It does not require a lot of configuration nor does it require rules to be written like other competitors do."

"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

"The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall."

Cons

"I would like to see more segregation managed through Oracle Identity Manager."

"The cost of this product needs to be reduced."

"Oracle Identity Governance can capture a lot of loads, it's stable. However, we once had a problem two years ago, but it is now resolved. There are some issues still present, but they're operational. They don't impact the customers. There are some improvements that can be done."

"Pricing for Oracle Identity Governance could be improved. The setup process for the tool could also be faster."

"The user interface experience needs to be improved."

"It's a complex solution, so it will take time in terms of deployment."

"They need to improve their backup strategy."

"Identity Governance is a difficult tool to work with. You have to input many models to understand what is happening with the logins. The user interface is not so good. And a lot of the features we use aren't available out of the box."

More Oracle Identity Governance cons

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

"The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help."

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."

"RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve out-of-the-box customization."

"If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume."

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring. Additionally, there is not much scope for customization - everything is hard-coded and predefined, so it does not allow the developers to make many modifications."

"Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy costs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle Identity Governance is expensive."

"I do not know specific pricing but the product is expensive when compared to other OIM products."

"Oracle Identity Governance is an expensive solution."

"Price-wise, the tool is a little bit costly."

"The licensing is expensive."

"Oracle licenses are expensive. I suggest making pricing and licensing decisions that align with architectural requirements and the project's budget."

"The price is based on the number of users per year."

"I can't say much about the pricing for Oracle Identity Governance because it's different from one geography to another. In India, the license price costs less than in other geographies."

More Oracle Identity Governance pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."

"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Identity Governance?

Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Governance?

Whether Oracle Identity Governance is affordable or slightly expensive depends on the category. For a small-scale company or organization, I don't think it will be useful, but for a large-scale ent...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Governance?

I see areas for improvement, as they need to introduce more connectors; they have around 20 plus connectors currently but can improve in that area. The only thing bothering me is the connectors, as...

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Overall, I would rate RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle at an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 15% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Identity Manager vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 5% of the time

Saviynt vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 5% of the time

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Identity Governance Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 49% of the time

One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 17% of the time

Saviynt vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 8% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 6% of the time

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Identity Governance

January 2026

Download Oracle Identity Governance product report

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

January 2026

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report

Download RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle product report

Also Known As

Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite

SecurID

Overview

Oracle Identity Governance (OIG) is a very versatile and robust enterprise identity management solution that offers functional and business performance competence by supplying centralized administration and total automation of identity and client provisioning events throughout the organization and user applications. Oracle Identity Governance monitors the complete identity and role process to satisfy rapidly changing business and complex compliance regulations and quickly delivers critical reporting and compliance capabilities.

Oracle Identity Governance is designed to easily identify which users have approved access to specific applications and other resources. It does this by using processes such as segregation of duties (SOD), role-based access control (RBAC), certifications, and access requests.

Oracle Identity Governance Features

Self-service wizard: Oracle Identity Governance has worked to make the onboarding of applications significantly easier. It no longer takes numerous steps and technical expertise. The self-service wizard makes the process simple and user-friendly.
Self-service APIs: This gives Oracle Identity Governance users an improved user experience (UX). The REST APIs for user self-service can be used for both web and mobile users. Oracle Identity Governance users are easily able to view user accounts and roles, in addition to being able to complete self-service tasks such as forgotten passwords, registration, and more.
Certification: Oracle Identity Governance offers many certification options, such as a custom access reviewer, group reviewing support, and designate certifications by completed percentage. OIG can also focus on specific role access and anomalies for access beyond a user-defined role (UDF).
Integration connectors: Oracle Identity Governance has many integration connector options for both cloud and on-premises deployments. Popular categories include Oracle Identity Cloud Service (IDCS) and traditional and hybrid systems such as Fusion Applications (FA). OIG also integrates well with connectors to Database Application Tables (DBAT), scripting tools, and web services. OIG offers several integration connectors with many of today’s top SaaS applications, such as Dropbox, Google Apps, Office 365, ServiceNow, and WebEx.

Reviews from Real Users

“The one thing that stands out was the automatic sign-out when an employee goes on vacation. Identity Governance can monitor when an employee goes on vacation and returns. We use this feature to automatically disable all the employee's accounts when they go on vacation, and they're automatically enabled when they come back. We can also automatically delete the employee's accounts when they're dismissed. Oracle has a model that gives you precise reports. It's called Crystal, and it's similar to JasperReports, so we can derive reports from this database. “ - Fabio L., Partner at a tech services company.

“We are using Oracle Identity Manager for the management of the identity cycle. We have a human resources system as a source, and we have some custom-made applications as a destination of the changes in the identities. - A PeerSpot user who is a Project Manager at a government “

Oracle

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.

RSA

Sample Customers

Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M

NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Identity Governance vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

February 2026

Free Report: Oracle Identity Governance vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Identity Governance vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Identity Governance vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.