Planview Daptiv vs Wrike comparison

Read 59 Wrike reviews

3,701 Views
3,035 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Planview Daptiv and Wrike based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike Report (Updated: April 2026).

Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (14th)

Wrike

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (13th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Awadhesh Singh

Project Manager at NebuFlow

Easy to tag people and has a form system to collect information but cannot work in multiple channels simultaneously

There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website. The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

More Planview Daptiv pros

"The interface is very user-friendly, and now that they have fixed the way to add a new folder, it is even more user-friendly."

"Weekly meetings and collaboration between different departments have become much more productive."

"Wrike has allowed us to collaborate with ease and to be able to communicate expectations quickly not only internally but also to external contributors."

"While it sounds a little cliche, I haven't found something that I wanted to do or organize that I couldn't do on Wrike."

"Wrike is the best project management tool I have used so far."

"The initial setup was intuitive, but the training and support videos provided help in moving us to a more developed organizational system."

"Wrike as a task management tool gives a lot of flexibility in creating, updating and managing tasks with such ease in comparison to other tools I have used."

"Large projects are much easier to manage and keep track of who is doing what portion and when."

More Wrike pros

Cons

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

More Planview Daptiv cons

"The mobile interface really needs work. It's hard to navigate and find tasks or folders/projects."

"It is great for smaller projects, but cannot replace Project or Smartsheet."

"Unfortunately there are a few dislikes: Various exports like the whole folder structure with the users who are directly shared with or the users/collaborators full list is not working."

"Wrike currently has no budgeting capabilities."

"The main concern was about the management of task and how easy it is to use the tool."

"When it comes to room for improvement, making the Gannt Charts more printer friendly would be ideal."

"When too many updates were done, we had to reload the web-app, the same did not happen on the iOS or Android App."

"However, support email reply should not take 12+ hours to those people who live in 12+ hours difference of timezone."

More Wrike cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five."

"Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400."

"Wrike is expensive."

"Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Wrike?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Wrike?

I use the tool as a project management tool to track project timelines and communicate with the team.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Wrike?

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten. I would recommend it to others.

See all answers

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

KeyedIn Projects vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

monday.com vs Wrike

Compared 10% of the time

Asana vs Wrike

Compared 9% of the time

Adobe Workfront vs Wrike

Compared 6% of the time

Smartsheet vs Wrike

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Wrike

Compared 3% of the time

More Wrike Competitors

Product Reports

Planview Daptiv

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Download Wrike product report

Overview

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Wrike offers dynamic project management capabilities with Gantt charts and time tracking, ensuring efficient collaboration and task customization. It integrates with Google Apps and features mobile accessibility for enhanced user engagement.

Wrike's platform facilitates seamless project and task management, time tracking, and collaboration across IT, marketing, and other departments. It supports project timelines and uses customizable dashboards for efficient task management. Despite a steep learning curve, its integration capabilities and mobile access provide a competitive edge. Users highlight areas for improvement like exporting datasets and better mobile app functionality but value its flexible task assignment and management features.

What are Wrike's Key Features?

Dynamic Gantt Chart: Streamlines project management with comprehensive timeline visualization.
Time Tracking: Robust features for monitoring task and project time allocation.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork through effective communication and task assignment.
Google Apps Integration: Seamlessly connects with Google's productivity suite.
Email Functionality: Efficient management and tracking of email communications.
Customizable Dashboards: Personalize task views for effective monitoring.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Expect?

Enhanced Collaboration: Improves team communication and assignment efficiency.
Task Customization: Flexibly assign and organize tasks across folders.
Mobile Accessibility: Access projects anywhere, enhancing project engagement.
Integrations: Supports existing workflows with popular productivity tools.
User Engagement: Intuitive design encourages active participation and monitoring.

Wrike is widely used in industries like AEC and property management, where it supports project timelines, ticketing, communication, and reporting. Global companies employ Wrike for workflow management, onboarding tasks, and utilizing views like Kanban to manage tasks efficiently.

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic

Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike