Planview Daptiv vs Wrike comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Planview and Wrike are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Additionally, 83% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Wrike users who would recommend it.

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

3,322 Views
1,528 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Wrike

Read 59 Wrike reviews

6,455 Views
5,164 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Wrike

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Planview Daptiv and Wrike based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (10th)

Wrike

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (13th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Awadhesh Singh

Project Manager at NebuFlow

Easy to tag people and has a form system to collect information but cannot work in multiple channels simultaneously

There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website. The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

More Planview Daptiv pros

"Wrike is so easy to get started with and so responsive that it is much easier to get team members to make it part of the workflow."

"Great way for our employees to send in project requests/ideas and then for us to be able to prioritize and schedule them."

"Wrike is a powerful tool to make a project a success, in my own opinion, for small and medium projects."

"It's an excellent project management tool in creating a successful project."

"Large projects are much easier to manage and keep track of who is doing what portion and when."

"The product is intuitive. It is easy to learn and update. You can follow the project from the beginning till the end with the help of the solution. The tool helps to update the project in seconds."

"Wrike is the best project management tool I have used so far."

"Their support is pretty good, and they've been pretty helpful."

More Wrike pros

Cons

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

More Planview Daptiv cons

"The flexibility, which is a strength, also requires you to think through how to structure Wrike to best serve your needs."

"It doesn't allow you to quickly see whether certain teams are over-scheduled at a quick glance."

"The interface takes some getting used to."

"I would like to see different statuses saved in different folders. Instead, the status is changed and it affects all folders globally."

"Possibly another user group, the collaborators cant do enough and they dont have a program it seems to have a ton of users."

"Interface takes a bit to get used to."

"Sometimes the interface can be messy."

"It would be nice if it was a little more intuitive and user-friendly, with less of a learning curve."

More Wrike cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five."

"Wrike is expensive."

"Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."

"Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	9

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 10% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Asana vs Wrike

Compared 7% of the time

monday.com vs Wrike

Compared 7% of the time

Jira vs Wrike

Compared 5% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Wrike

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Wrike

Compared 3% of the time

More Wrike Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

October 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Buyer's Guide

Wrike

October 2026

Download Wrike product report

Overview

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Wrike is an enterprise-grade, trusted work delivery platform designed to help organizations put people and AI to work together on their most consequential workflows. Built on two decades of enterprise work management and powered by the Wrike Work Intelligence® Graph, Wrike gives teams the governed foundation they need to plan, execute, and deliver complex work at scale. Wrike offers tailored solutions for marketing and creative teams, project management teams, product teams, professional services teams, and beyond.

AI-Powered Work Delivery

Wrike has been building AI into the fabric of the platform for nearly a decade, giving organizations a suite of deeply integrated capabilities designed to extend what people can accomplish. Wrike AI Agents handle real work autonomously inside the platform, moving workflows forward within the same roles, permissions, and access controls as your people. Wrike Copilot reduces administrative burden by drafting content, summarizing projects, and generating status reports directly in the flow of work. And the Wrike MCP Server connects AI assistants directly to the platform where execution actually happens, so every AI-driven action becomes part of the auditable record of how work gets done, not a disconnected output living outside the system. All of it is powered by the Work Intelligence® Graph, built on 500B+ historical data points and two decades of enterprise work management, giving every AI capability the structured context it needs to act reliably. Together, they give organizations the governed foundation to scale delivery in a way that wasn't possible before.

Security

Wrike is ISO 27001 certified with SOC 2 and SOC 3 audit reports and full GDPR compliance across every data touchpoint. Data centers operate in both the US and EU, with encryption at rest and in transit. Every AI-driven action in Wrike is permission-scoped, logged, and auditable, with a full audit trail ensuring every action is attributable. Role-based access controls scale to 100,000+ users across 40 or more countries, and OAuth 2.0 security replaces generic API keys with short-lived, user-scoped, revocable tokens so each AI assistant operates with defined, controlled permissions.

Collaboration

Wrike brings the enterprise together regardless of where people are, with built-in communication and editing tools that eliminate silos and foster transparency and accountability across teams. Wrike's MCP Server allows AI assistants to connect directly to the platform where execution actually happens, so AI-driven actions become part of the auditable record of how work gets done — not disconnected outputs living outside the system. Hundreds of integrations, including Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams, keep work connected across every tool your teams rely on.

Visibility

Wrike delivers real-time visualizations of team and project portfolio performance to facilitate faster, smarter, data-driven decisions. Customizable dashboards, Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and advanced reporting bring full transparency into project status for stakeholders at every level. Powered by the Work Intelligence® Graph, Wrike can auto-generate executive reports pulled directly from live data, giving compliance, legal, and leadership teams project status they can actually rely on.

Wrike

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Siemens, Walmart, NVIDIA, Blue Yonder, Syneos Health, Sony Pictures, Ogilvy, and The Estée Lauder Companies

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike

November 2026

Free Report: Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Daptiv vs. Wrike report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.