Planview Portfolios vs Project Objects comparison

Planview and Project Objects are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Additionally, 91% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Project Objects users who would recommend it.

Planview Portfolios

Read 71 Planview Portfolios reviews

6,053 Views
2,542 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Project Objects

Read 1 Project Objects review

940 Views
705 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

Project Objects

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Planview Portfolios and Project Objects based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Portfolios

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (9th), Project Portfolio Management (4th)

Project Objects

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (44th)

Featured Reviews

Monabi Kingsley

Project Manager at 3M

Centralized planning has improved resource visibility and supports data‑driven financial decisions

The best features Planview Portfolios offers are visibility enhancement, robust system performance, and comprehensive resource management. This enhanced visibility in Planview Portfolios ensures that all users can easily track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions to optimize workflow efficiency. When discussing robust system performance, the system's robust performance in meeting our various work requirements effectively and efficiently stands out. It is very stable and reliable, contributing to a seamless user experience, which enables users to focus on their tasks without disruptions. I also love the financial breakdown, planning and prioritization, and attribute collection on projects in Planview Portfolios. Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since I started using it. It has enabled me to gain insights into the full scope of work consuming resources. I am able to know where the resources are being consumed more, especially which resources are consuming the most. I have been able to leverage resources management and resource time reporting, which enabled the generation of $90 million in annual revenue through labor billing to customers.

Read full review

Massimiliano Faraon

CEO at Artesys Orion

Responsive support, good third-party integration, and offers hybrid-mode project management

There are a lot of features. The most valuable feature is the ability to implement different scenarios. For example, a big company can implement its next three-year strategy along the two or three main pillars of the approach. Each pillar is composed of several portfolios, and each of those is composed of different projects. When you define the strategy for the next three-year budget, you can analyze the impact of each option. Based on this, you can decide things like assigning more or fewer resources to a project. You can allocate generic resources, like a project manager. Then in the second stage, you can assign names such as who specifically will be in charge of a project. You can do the same thing with all of the human resources that are involved. It provides the capability of integrating with the Agile Scrum component module. There is also integration with third-parties like Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, Check Point, Jira, ServiceNow!, and others. There is the separation between execution from a technical point of view where the staff can work in a classical workflow, Agile, or a hybrid Agile. The project manager and program manager will receive the high-level information needed to keep strict control over the project. You are able to do whatever is needed from the customer's point of view, without coding. Configuring the platform does not require the writing of any code. This is something that is very important. As soon as a new informational structure is created, it will be immediately available for the business intelligence module. This means that you can perform analytics on it. The BI module is very helpful. There is no comparison between it and other BI tools that are available right now. The network uptime is greater than 99%.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have a fairly good picture of time tracking."

"Our ability to do strategic portfolio reporting has gotten much better."

"Planview has helped connect funding and strategic outcomes with work execution. That is the key use that we have for it. We use it to validate the work that we're doing and the funding that we need. The difference between the previous version and current version for us would be the ICPM and the way it gives us different scenarios. We can go in and build that out."

"We provided whatever feedback we had to the Planview team, and they went in and built those additional features that we requested. For example, they created a great way for our users to search for a specific resource, project, program, or role. We were not using some of the features, and we wanted them to not be visible, and they helped us with that. They also brought a feature to provide visibility into when a resource was never assigned to any task. There was no visibility to this before. This feature was really very good for visibility into the resource portfolio."

"The Kanban board has really helped us be more agile and we can keep track of everything that is ongoing."

"One of the reasons why I love Enterprise One so much is due to the fact that, when I first started using it in 2014, when I was given the role to help administrators, there was an assumption that this tool was too complex."

"At the time of evaluation, there were only four or five environments in the entire world that could have met our requirements, and Planview by far was the best."

"We can easily see which functions are overcapacity. Before, we did not have visibility into that."

More Planview Portfolios pros

"Configuring the platform does not require the writing of any code."

"This is a very powerful product and I absolutely recommend it."

Cons

"I think that the user interface needs some getting used to. It's not immediately intuitive."

"Many times, we've had people give us attitude, delays in response, or just a lack of interest."

"The resource area needs improvement. The improvements that have been made recently in the later versions have been good improvements, but I think there are some more improvements needed there."

"It could do with a quicker response time for some reports or portfolios."

"It is not an end-user-friendly product, and that's really the biggest thing. The hardest or the biggest hurdle I've ever had to face was adoption. I did the installation of the HP product in 2011. The company used it from 2011 to 2015, and the adoption was very high. When I was given the Planview product, adoption was very low. It wasn't as extensively used. We actually had people who wanted to go back to HP PPM because the interface of Planview was so broken, and it still is to some degree. So, it is not user-friendly. It doesn't flow the way a project manager thinks. What we did with HP PPM was a lot more manual programming. It wasn't as nice in terms of the interface, and it wasn't as pretty, but you could design it and build it so that everything flows with the way you worked, but Planview doesn't quite do that. There are a lot of screens. You have to jump back and forth. There are so many different places you have to go to just to do some basic tasks. That's the biggest thing that has really hindered adoption."

"I think that the user interface needs some getting used to. It's not immediately intuitive. That's potentially room for improvement. I think also that an organization needs to have good support from some senior management to get something like Planview established."

"The reporting capability and access to the fields for our system administrators to have access to the data without having to pay Enterprise One to get the data that's needed to create custom reports for management to create reports need improvement."

"We do have some significant issues with our integrations that we're working through. Those are not as stable or reliable as what we would like."

More Planview Portfolios cons

"A lot of companies are investing heavily in artificial intelligence, so more such features would benefit this product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think all in we are at $33,000 a year and that includes Projectplace and Planview. We used to have the integration to JIRA, but we don't pay for that anymore."

"In the time that I've used it, we've doubled up the amount of dollars on our intended projects."

"The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools."

"Planview is a little pricey. From a licensing perspective, for just a simple timesheet user who does nothing in the system but reports time, the licensing is a little pricey, but you have to look at it from what it is that you get. We have 6,000 users, and I don't manage the system at all. I just have to do add them to the system. The servers, maintenance, OS levels, security patching for the OS, and all other things are not something that we maintain. So, you have to look at it from an operational perspective. It is not just the product itself. A holistic view has to be taken when you look at the product and how you're going to support it. I would have to hire an entire operation staff to bring it in-house, and at the end of the day, that might cost me more."

"With the costs, they were very understanding. Knowing that we were an existing customer, they were very much willing to work with us to make sure that we were able to transition to Enterprise One from PPM Pro."

"We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that. However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using."

"We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."

"Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Marketing Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	66

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planview Portfolios?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Planview Portfolios is one of the best and a very cost-effective tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Planview Portfolios can be improved as the user interface defaults to the last opened portfolio, which can waste a lot of time loading a large portfolio if that is not what I need at that moment. J...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planview Portfolios?

My main use case for Planview Portfolios is to ensure governance and decision auditability by incorporating embedded workflows, approval management, and key document retention supporting a single c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

Planisware vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

KeyedIn Projects vs Project Objects

Compared 20% of the time

Planview AdaptiveWork vs Project Objects

Compared 17% of the time

Smartsheet vs Project Objects

Compared 11% of the time

SoftExpert PPM vs Project Objects

Compared 11% of the time

Wrike vs Project Objects

Compared 10% of the time

More Project Objects Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

June 2026

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

June 2026

Download Project Objects product report

Also Known As

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

No data available

Overview

Planview Portfolios empowers executives, finance, and portfolio leaders by enhancing strategic investments, improving market responsiveness, and connecting strategy and execution for optimal visibility.

Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive strategic and project portfolio management to organizations. Automating and scaling these processes, it enhances speed-to-value, aligns strategic objectives with execution, and connects business and technology planning for optimal funding and resource capacity. Users gain end-to-end visibility, track progress, and improve decision-making by utilizing integrated financial and capacity planning.

What key features does Planview Portfolios offer?

Strategic Alignment: Aligns objectives and OKRs with execution to ensure strategic goals are met.
End-to-End Visibility: Tracks performance across the organization to support timely decision-making.
Dynamic Planning and Funding: Utilizes scenario modeling for flexible strategic investment funding.
Flexible Capacity Planning: Balances programs and staffing levels against available capacity.
Connected Technology Strategy: Aligns technology investments with strategic digital initiatives.
Adaptive Program Management: Manages dependencies, risk, and progress through integrated planning.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Planview Portfolios?

Workflow Efficiency: Enhances efficiency by minimizing bottlenecks and optimizing execution.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides comprehensive insights for better informed strategic decisions.
Financial Insights: Offers detailed financial tracking across projects for greater transparency.
Organizational Agility: Increases productivity and adaptability through a unified platform.

Planview Portfolios is implemented across projects in industries requiring strategic planning, resource allocation, and financial tracking. Organizations manage project lifecycle and integration with ERP systems on a centralized platform, utilizing customizable workflows and reporting tools to enhance efficiency and streamline team processes.

Planview

Project Objects offers an intuitive project management platform tailored to enhance collaboration and optimize resource allocation for enterprises. Designed to meet complex demands, it provides comprehensive tools to streamline project execution and drive efficiency.

Architected for forward-thinking businesses, Project Objects empowers teams with advanced features to manage projects efficiently. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems, ensuring minimal disruption while delivering robust performance metrics. It provides a strategic edge in planning and resource management, allowing firms to track milestones, manage costs, and improve project outcomes.

What are the standout features of Project Objects?

Dashboard Analytics: Real-time insights into project performance to facilitate informed decision-making.
Resource Management: Optimized allocation of resources to maximize productivity and minimize waste.
Collaboration Tools: Enhanced communication channels to ensure cohesive teamwork.
Budget Tracking: Comprehensive cost monitoring to avoid overspending and keep projects on financial track.
Time Management: Tools to efficiently manage project timelines and deliverables.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlined processes lead to quicker project completion.
Cost Savings: Effective budget and resource management reduces financial waste.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates transparent communication and increases team productivity.
Enhanced Project Visibility: Real-time analytics offer clear insights for better strategic planning.

Industries such as manufacturing, construction, and IT frequently implement Project Objects to drive project success. Its adaptability to complex workflows makes it a prime choice for sectors requiring precision and collaborative efforts.

Project Objects

Sample Customers

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

Kells, Co. Meath

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.