Planview Portfolios vs UNICOM System Architect comparison

Planview and Unicom Systems are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Planview is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5, while Unicom Systems is ranked #24. Planview holds a 2.8% mindshare in AM, compared to Unicom Systems’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Unicom Systems users who would recommend it.

Planview Portfolios

Read 71 Planview Portfolios reviews

5,418 Views
1,246 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

UNICOM System Architect

Read 2 UNICOM System Architect reviews

615 Views
609 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

UNICOM System Architect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Planview Portfolios and UNICOM System Architect compete in the portfolio management and enterprise architecture domains. While Planview offers better pricing and support, UNICOM is often preferred for its superior feature set.

Features: Planview provides robust features like resource management, financial planning, and performance analytics. UNICOM stands out with system modeling, integration visualization, and comprehensive enterprise architecture capabilities. Planview focuses on project and resource management; UNICOM emphasizes architectural modeling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview offers a streamlined cloud-based deployment with timely support, making it easier for organizations with large project needs. UNICOM has bespoke deployment options, allowing tailored installations but with more complexity. Planview offers efficient deployment, while UNICOM provides customizable setups.

Pricing and ROI: Planview has competitive pricing aimed at quick ROI through efficient resource utilization and cost management. UNICOM requires a higher initial investment due to its advanced features, providing long-term ROI by improving enterprise architecture efficiencies. Planview is cost-effective with quicker ROI; UNICOM offers higher initial costs for strategic benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Portfolios vs. UNICOM System Architect Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios vs. UNICOM System Architect

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Portfolios

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (4th)

UNICOM System Architect

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

24th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Planview Portfolios is 2.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UNICOM System Architect is 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview Portfolios	2.8%
UNICOM System Architect	1.6%
Other	95.6%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Monabi Kingsley

Project Manager at 3M

Centralized planning has improved resource visibility and supports data‑driven financial decisions

The best features Planview Portfolios offers are visibility enhancement, robust system performance, and comprehensive resource management. This enhanced visibility in Planview Portfolios ensures that all users can easily track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions to optimize workflow efficiency. When discussing robust system performance, the system's robust performance in meeting our various work requirements effectively and efficiently stands out. It is very stable and reliable, contributing to a seamless user experience, which enables users to focus on their tasks without disruptions. I also love the financial breakdown, planning and prioritization, and attribute collection on projects in Planview Portfolios. Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since I started using it. It has enabled me to gain insights into the full scope of work consuming resources. I am able to know where the resources are being consumed more, especially which resources are consuming the most. I have been able to leverage resources management and resource time reporting, which enabled the generation of $90 million in annual revenue through labor billing to customers.

Read full review

reviewer1261290

Project Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Useful for creating build-outs and architecture views, but requires a publisher add-on for some detailed reports

I don't use the tool or know a lot. It is going to have some shortcomings. When it comes down to publishing, we just found out this week that they actually have a publisher add-on. So, what we were trying to publish was not giving a detailed report about the architecture, views, etc. I just wish they had sent these to UNICOM and contacted them about add-on features for the publishing part of the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has been effective for our delivery. It's given us much better visibility into what is being delivered and when."

"The portfolio and technology management are well built."

"Enterprise One makes it really easy to just pull the resource management tab and quickly look at who is overloaded."

"The most valuable features are scheduling, resource management, and, from a project perspective, the functions like issues that change orders. They are valuable because, from a project management perspective, we use the workflows that we build for project management and do active risk management and issue management for the projects that we want for our agencies."

"The most valuable features are the resource management, the time sheet entry and usage, and the financial planning. With our projects, we primarily focus on resource assignments, as far as determining the actual forecast and actuals of our projects. A lot of it is based off of the resources utilized on those projects. The time based helps us capture the actuals. The amount of time people are spending on working on their project tasks. Because they've built this into the schedule, so we can build the forecast. With financial planning, we're able to look back on what our variance is and if there is anything between the scheduled forecasted hours, dollars against the actual hours, and the costs that they utilize."

"The most valuable features are the control and visibility that you have for portfolio management in terms of projects and capacity planning for resources along with strategies and outcomes, etc. It's so easy to access information for sharing analytics and reporting."

"The biggest benefit that we have seen is that it's increased visibility across the board and given us a lot of data to actually make data-driven decisions, whereas before this product we didn't have the level of detail to make informed decisions around a lot of trade-offs with our strategic portfolio."

"The solution view into resource capacity and availability helps us to manage work."

More Planview Portfolios pros

"It is useful for creating build-outs and architecture views and for publishing reports and stuff like that for different programs."

"It has good end-to-end metamodel interrelationships."

Cons

"I would like to be able to copy and paste from Excel into work and assignments along with roles and hours, as opposed to having to type it out one by one."

"It would be great to see Planview incorporate agile interfacing/methods in it. Like CA Clarity and other leading PPM tools – Planview should enhance or develop the interfaces to ingrate with other market leading Agile tools."

"It is not an end-user-friendly product, and that's really the biggest thing. The hardest or the biggest hurdle I've ever had to face was adoption. I did the installation of the HP product in 2011. The company used it from 2011 to 2015, and the adoption was very high. When I was given the Planview product, adoption was very low. It wasn't as extensively used. We actually had people who wanted to go back to HP PPM because the interface of Planview was so broken, and it still is to some degree. So, it is not user-friendly. It doesn't flow the way a project manager thinks. What we did with HP PPM was a lot more manual programming. It wasn't as nice in terms of the interface, and it wasn't as pretty, but you could design it and build it so that everything flows with the way you worked, but Planview doesn't quite do that. There are a lot of screens. You have to jump back and forth. There are so many different places you have to go to just to do some basic tasks. That's the biggest thing that has really hindered adoption."

"The solution needs to be better at accepting new ideas for upcoming releases."

"Its ability to create summary reports across multiple projects is very limited. In terms of the out-of-the-box reporting for summary reports, the reporting that we typically leverage is around forecasting for resources, timesheets, and actuals, and just looking at what is the capacity. There is no real summary of what work is being done and how work is being accomplished. So, what we typically do is that we get a copy of the data files from Enterprise One daily, and then we have a team that manages the data mod outside of Enterprise One. They use data from Enterprise One as well as other additional sources to provide the reporting that we share with the management. So, we leverage a lot of Enterprise One data for reporting, but we don't use the reporting capabilities within Enterprise One. So, reporting can be improved, and they could help us make more customized reporting. I know it is very configurable out of the box, but we have to leverage an outside data mod that pulls in a lot of data from Enterprise One. So, the reporting function, and being able to customize reports, is the area that could be very beneficial."

"I would like a bit more flexibility, as far as the configuration, and have additional capabilities to configure, making it more flexible for our use."

"When you think of planning at a PI level, roadmap planning, or release planning, I think they should make a little more headway into how agile delivery works, tying it back into the financials and the planning to Planview."

"I think the capabilities are there, but it seems difficult for me to even create a report as I am not a Planview technical expert. It is not particularly intuitive."

More Planview Portfolios cons

"They need to add reports that show the enterprise architecture perspectives, and the dashboards should be comfortable for the senior enterprise architects so that they can view the complete landscape."

"I don't use the tool or know a lot. It is going to have some shortcomings. When it comes down to publishing, we just found out this week that they actually have a publisher add-on. So, what we were trying to publish was not giving a detailed report about the architecture, views, etc. I just wish they had sent these to UNICOM and contacted them about add-on features for the publishing part of the tool."

"UNICOM System Architect is quite a dated tool. The usability needs to be improved."

"When it comes down to publishing, we just found out this week that they actually have a publisher add-on, so what we were trying to publish was not giving a detailed report about the architecture, views, etc."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."

"The cost of other pieces and integrating them in needs improvement."

"We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that. However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using."

"In the time that I've used it, we've doubled up the amount of dollars on our intended projects."

"Our licensing costs are about a quarter of a million dollars per year."

"When we went through that process, I believe it is competitive with others on the market. However, there are less expensive options available. It's a more premium offering at a higher price."

"I think all in we are at $33,000 a year and that includes Projectplace and Planview. We used to have the integration to JIRA, but we don't pay for that anymore."

"Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

"I don't remember the price. It is a different cost for just buying it, and then you have a maintenance cost, which you need to renew every year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	66

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planview Portfolios?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Planview Portfolios is one of the best and a very cost-effective tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Planview Portfolios can be improved as the user interface defaults to the last opened portfolio, which can waste a lot of time loading a large portfolio if that is not what I need at that moment. J...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planview Portfolios?

My main use case for Planview Portfolios is to ensure governance and decision auditability by incorporating embedded workflows, approval management, and key document retention supporting a single c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

Planisware vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

IBM Rational System Architect vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 19% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 19% of the time

erwin Data Modeler vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 12% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText ProVision vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 7% of the time

More UNICOM System Architect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

April 2026

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

April 2026

Download UNICOM System Architect product report

Also Known As

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

No data available

Overview

Planview Portfolios empowers executives, finance, and portfolio leaders by enhancing strategic investments, improving market responsiveness, and connecting strategy and execution for optimal visibility.

Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive strategic and project portfolio management to organizations. Automating and scaling these processes, it enhances speed-to-value, aligns strategic objectives with execution, and connects business and technology planning for optimal funding and resource capacity. Users gain end-to-end visibility, track progress, and improve decision-making by utilizing integrated financial and capacity planning.

What key features does Planview Portfolios offer?

Strategic Alignment: Aligns objectives and OKRs with execution to ensure strategic goals are met.
End-to-End Visibility: Tracks performance across the organization to support timely decision-making.
Dynamic Planning and Funding: Utilizes scenario modeling for flexible strategic investment funding.
Flexible Capacity Planning: Balances programs and staffing levels against available capacity.
Connected Technology Strategy: Aligns technology investments with strategic digital initiatives.
Adaptive Program Management: Manages dependencies, risk, and progress through integrated planning.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Planview Portfolios?

Workflow Efficiency: Enhances efficiency by minimizing bottlenecks and optimizing execution.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides comprehensive insights for better informed strategic decisions.
Financial Insights: Offers detailed financial tracking across projects for greater transparency.
Organizational Agility: Increases productivity and adaptability through a unified platform.

Planview Portfolios is implemented across projects in industries requiring strategic planning, resource allocation, and financial tracking. Organizations manage project lifecycle and integration with ERP systems on a centralized platform, utilizing customizable workflows and reporting tools to enhance efficiency and streamline team processes.

Planview

UNICOM System Architect is a comprehensive tool designed for enterprise architecture modeling. It aids organizations in visualizing, analyzing, and interpreting data across various domains to facilitate strategic IT decision-making.

Developed to address complex architectural challenges, UNICOM System Architect enables businesses to create a cohesive model of their IT landscape. Its capabilities extend to providing a holistic view of systems, business processes, and data, which enables enhanced collaboration and strategic planning. The platform is known for its robust analytical tools that support enterprise architecture initiatives and allow for a detailed representation of an organization's technical structure.

What are the Key Features of UNICOM System Architect?

Modeling Support: Offers extensive modeling capabilities for business and IT alignment.
Data Integration: Allows seamless integration with various databases and tools.
Comprehensive Analysis: Provides in-depth analysis tools for strategic decision-making.
Visualization Tools: Delivers advanced visualization options to map IT landscapes.

What Benefits Should Users Look For?

Improved Decision-Making: Facilitates informed decision-making with detailed insights.
Enhanced Collaboration: Supports collaborative efforts in architecture planning.
Cost Efficiency: Helps in optimizing resources, reducing unnecessary IT expenditures.
Agility: Aids organizations in adapting quickly to changes in the technological environment.

UNICOM System Architect is implemented across diverse industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. It supports digital transformation initiatives by offering tools that align IT systems with business strategies. In the finance industry, it is used for risk management and compliance, while healthcare benefits from data integration and process optimization features.

Unicom Systems

Sample Customers

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

Apple, Facebook, Google, HSBC, PayPal

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios vs. UNICOM System Architect

April 2026

Free Report: Planview Portfolios vs. UNICOM System Architect

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Portfolios vs. UNICOM System Architect and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Portfolios vs. UNICOM System Architect report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.