Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Postman Enterprise vs Runscope [EOL] comparison

Postman and Broadcom are both solutions in the API Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 95% of Postman users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Postman Enterprise
Read 65 Postman Enterprise reviews
  • 4,482 Views
  • 224 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Runscope [EOL]
Read 11 Runscope [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

    Runscope EOL and Postman Enterprise compete in the API testing and monitoring space. Postman Enterprise holds an advantage, offering a more robust solution due to its enhanced features.

    Features: Postman Enterprise offers automated testing workflows, API documentation, and advanced collaboration features. Runscope EOL provided comprehensive API monitoring, internal team collaboration, and was simpler for smaller teams.

    Room for Improvement: Postman Enterprise could improve by simplifying its interface and reducing the learning curve. Runscope EOL needed stronger customer support, scalability, and a broader range of advanced features.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Postman Enterprise is straightforward to deploy and offers reliable customer support for large-scale operations. Runscope EOL was easier to deploy for small teams but lacked extensive support for larger enterprises.

    Pricing and ROI: Runscope EOL was more budget-friendly for startups, whereas Postman Enterprise, despite a higher cost, provides better ROI due to its comprehensive features and scalability.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed API Monitoring Software Report (Updated: February 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    February 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Postman Enterprise
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.8
    Number of Reviews
    65
    Ranking in other categories
    API Management (7th), API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), AI Software Development (6th)
    Runscope [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.8
    Number of Reviews
    11
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    TS
    TOMISLAV SOKAC
    API Integration Engineer at Airbnb
    Automated testing optimizes API workflow and collaboration
    Since I am using the free tier, one improvement would be to increase the number of requests you can send in a short time period. Currently, if I send 200-300 requests in a short period, Postman Enterprise requires a 30-second wait before sending another bundle of requests unless you upgrade to a higher tier. Secondly, Postman Enterprise sometimes takes several minutes to load the whole workspace. With 2,000-3,000 requests in a workspace, it can take a minute or two to load all requests. When creating a new workspace and moving requests between workspaces, depending on internet speed, it can take a longer period to copy those requests or workspace from one place to another.
    Read full review
    Director5672 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Director5672
    Director of Engineering at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
    Enables us to monitor API endpoints to ensure everything is running
    I've noticed, once or twice, when there were some updates pushed by Runscope, at times it didn't refresh the pages. I was running it, there were multiple tests running at the same time, and it didn't update the webpage I was looking at. So I had to refresh it manually. Occasionally, it still happens. Another thing I have found is that the built-in editor for the scripts can be improved a lot. Instead of making such a basic editor, maybe include a little more so it is easier to look at things and debug. Finally, other than the Runscope documentation, I haven't seen too much elsewhere. I haven't seen a user community.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results."
    "The solution collects scenarios and allows for testing SOAP API, REST API and API automation at the same time."
    "It is a scalable solution."
    "Postman is open-source and free to use."
    "We can also submit requests multiple times and it allows us to capture the response each time by using utility scripts."
    "It is easy and simple to use and install. It is compatible with Linux, Mac or Windows."
    "Postman is useful for API testing."
    "The data you are sending and fetching from that endpoint is very clean and understandable; anyone can understand it."
    More Postman Enterprise pros
    "As we have the APIs scheduled, we use the notifications. We know the exact moment it is breaking something that might impact the customer system, that might result in a feature not working. We know "in advance" and we can fix it before the customer notices. It helps us to be more proactive."
    "When it's a problem on our side, the server is down, or there is a lack of memory, the first thing to break is the API, because the calls can't be processed. So we know exactly at that moment because we receive notifications, and we can take action. It doesn't only notify us of the type problem, but it also links it to our servers."
    "We have the ability to populate environment variables using scripts. This allows us to keep the configuration mostly dynamic and avoid a lot of manual updates when something changes."
    "Valuable features include: Being able to add tests as sub-tests in a parent test for regression testing; notifications for tests that pass/fail; being able to customize expected results with assertions; being able to set tests to run daily."
    "This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments. Through integration with Slack, our development and DevOps teams are quickly aware of issues related to new changes deployed to non-production environments, which tightens our feedback loop during testing. Through integration with PagerDuty, our DevOps resources are able to reduce the adverse impact of a given production issue."
    "We love the fact that we can have our API tests run on a schedule as often as we need. We also take advantage of being able to set up different environment settings so that we can use the same test in our production, integration, and QA environments, easily. The ability to string together a number of API tests for a test suite is very important to us as well."
    "The feature of automatically executing tests at a predefined time interval is great as we can be continuously testing our end-points before and after builds are deployed."
    "We utilize modular tests based on environment variables. These have saved QA a lot of time when setting up our back-end automation."
    More Runscope [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "Could be more user friendly."
    "I have display issues in my Windows that need to be fixed."
    "We cannot see transaction times in the product."
    "The solution can be improved by providing detailed error logs including the line the error took place to make it easier to correct."
    "One area that could be better is collection management."
    "One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords."
    "I would like to see more integrations with other platforms."
    "The performance needs to be improved."
    More Postman Enterprise cons
    "File upload is a big part of the products that we test. The lack of file upload in Runscope requires us to still use UI (Selenium) automated tests for these scenarios."
    "If you forget to set the default environment during test creation, you have to go through every test and make sure that it is set to the environment that you prefer if using shared environments. If there was an option to force all tests within a bucket into a specific environment with one click, this would save a lot of time."
    "I've noticed, once or twice, when there were some updates pushed by Runscope, at times it didn't refresh the pages. I was running it, there were multiple tests running at the same time, and it didn't update the webpage I was looking at. So I had to refresh it manually. Occasionally, it still happens."
    "Currently, we can only schedule to the nearest five minutes, one hour, two hours, etc. If we could set up the exact time that we want it to run, that would be good because sometimes we have one service that crosses another service."
    "the built-in editor for the scripts can be improved a lot. Instead of making such a basic editor, maybe include a little more so it is easier to look at things and debug."
    "We would like to have an improved ability to share a set of tests across different environments (e.g., dev, stage, and prod)."
    "Reliability. I would like to see more money invested in disaster recovery testing of the application. The product should be hosted across several AWS regions so if there are issues with an EC2 instance in a particular region, the whole application won't be affected. Once or twice a year there are issues with AWS that causes the reliability of the application to suffer."
    "We definitely make use of historical test results, especially when tracking more difficult issues such as timeouts. Per our test frequency (15 minutes) we often need to go back further than the last 100 test runs. We are aware that results further back in time are available through the Runscope API, however, it would be great if the dashboard allowed easy access to a larger amount of historical data."
    More Runscope [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The solution's price is reasonable."
    "We are using the free version that is available."
    "I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."
    "This solution offers a free version."
    "I use the tool's free version."
    "Postman is a free service."
    "I am using the free option."
    "I rate the price of Postman a four out of five."
    More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice
    "The price for the product is very reasonable for a team of more than four to five members."
    "Runscope pricing is unbeatable"
    "Having the different plans organized by team size, buckets, and requests per billing period works for our needs. Larger companies may need to take a close look at these elements."
    "Pricing is fair."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    19%
    Computer Software Company
    14%
    Insurance Company
    8%
    Manufacturing Company
    5%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business17
    Midsize Enterprise9
    Large Enterprise41
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business6
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
    Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Postman?
    The product is easy to implement.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
    Postman is much cheaper than the other tools. I am not aware of the current pricing for Postman because that's taken care of by the client; we just pay and they simply create options. On a per-pers...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 10% of the time
    Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 9% of the time
    Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 8% of the time
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 7% of the time
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 6% of the time
    More Postman Enterprise Competitors
    AlertSite vs Runscope [EOL] Logo
    AlertSite vs Runscope [EOL]
    Compared 47% of the time
    More Runscope [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Postman Enterprise
    January 2026
    Postman Enterprise reportDownload Postman Enterprise product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Runscope [EOL]
    January 2026
    Runscope [EOL] reportDownload Runscope [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    No data available
    CA Runscope
     

    Overview

    Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

    Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

    What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?
    • Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
    • Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
    • Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
    • Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
    • Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.
    What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?
    • Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
    • Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
    • Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

    In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

    Postman
    Information not available
    Broadcom
     

    Sample Customers

    PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
    Twilio, Microsoft, Adobe, Okta, Tesco, Charter Communications
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    February 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Postman, F5, SmartBear and others in API Monitoring Software. Updated: February 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best API Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all API Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.