No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Postman Enterprise vs Runscope [EOL] comparison

Postman and Broadcom are both solutions in the API Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 95% of Postman users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Postman Enterprise
Read 69 Postman Enterprise reviews
  • 5,735 Views
  • 287 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Runscope [EOL]
Read 11 Runscope [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

    Runscope EOL and Postman Enterprise compete in the API testing and monitoring space. Postman Enterprise holds an advantage, offering a more robust solution due to its enhanced features.

    Features: Postman Enterprise offers automated testing workflows, API documentation, and advanced collaboration features. Runscope EOL provided comprehensive API monitoring, internal team collaboration, and was simpler for smaller teams.

    Room for Improvement: Postman Enterprise could improve by simplifying its interface and reducing the learning curve. Runscope EOL needed stronger customer support, scalability, and a broader range of advanced features.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Postman Enterprise is straightforward to deploy and offers reliable customer support for large-scale operations. Runscope EOL was easier to deploy for small teams but lacked extensive support for larger enterprises.

    Pricing and ROI: Runscope EOL was more budget-friendly for startups, whereas Postman Enterprise, despite a higher cost, provides better ROI due to its comprehensive features and scalability.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed API Monitoring Software Report (Updated: April 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    April 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Postman Enterprise
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.8
    Number of Reviews
    69
    Ranking in other categories
    API Management (6th), API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), AI Software Development (8th)
    Runscope [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.8
    Number of Reviews
    11
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Ravi Raushan Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
    Ravi Raushan Kumar
    Software Engineer at ValueMomentum
    Collaborative API workflows have improved testing speed and streamlined multi-team releases
    The best features of Postman Enterprise are team collaborations, automated API testing, environment management, and API governance. The shared workspace and collections make collaborations very smooth across the teams, and automated testing and CI/CD integrations help catch issues early. I also appreciate the governance and security features because they help maintain API standards and consistency across large projects. API governance has helped my team maintain consistent API naming, request structures, and documentation standards across multiple services, reducing confusion between the teams and making onboarding easier. On the security side, environment variables and access control helped me avoid exposing sensitive data such as tokens or API keys, and they also made collaborations safer because different teams could access only the resources they needed. I found that the collections runner and automated testing features are very valuable because they save a lot of manual task time and help identify issues quickly during deployments. Postman Enterprise has improved collaborations, reduced API integration issues, and sped up the testing cycles in my organization. It provides a centralized platform for API development, documentation, and testing, which has improved consistency while reducing communication gaps between the frontend, backend, and QA teams. It has also helped catch issues earlier in the development cycle, improving overall release quality.
    Read full review
    Director5672 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Director5672
    Director of Engineering at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
    Enables us to monitor API endpoints to ensure everything is running
    I've noticed, once or twice, when there were some updates pushed by Runscope, at times it didn't refresh the pages. I was running it, there were multiple tests running at the same time, and it didn't update the webpage I was looking at. So I had to refresh it manually. Occasionally, it still happens. Another thing I have found is that the built-in editor for the scripts can be improved a lot. Instead of making such a basic editor, maybe include a little more so it is easier to look at things and debug. Finally, other than the Runscope documentation, I haven't seen too much elsewhere. I haven't seen a user community.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "I like that it is very easy to use. I also like the automation feature."
    "The user interface is very easy to learn and use, and it is a lightweight application."
    "The solution provides visibility for PDF reports without needing to install plugins."
    "It is a very stable solution."
    "It helps me to test APIs independently. It also supports hosting."
    "What is most valuable for me is that we can create and share collections between the team members."
    "We are using the automation and performance testing tools."
    "It is stable and does not lag."
    More Postman Enterprise pros
    "As we have the APIs scheduled, we use the notifications. We know the exact moment it is breaking something that might impact the customer system, that might result in a feature not working. We know "in advance" and we can fix it before the customer notices. It helps us to be more proactive."
    "It helps us verify that production deployments do not break the features our customers use."
    "It uses JavaScript which is easy."
    "Pre-request Scripts and Post-response Scripts are very handy."
    "The feature of automatically executing tests at a predefined time interval is great as we can be continuously testing our end-points before and after builds are deployed."
    "We love the fact that we can have our API tests run on a schedule as often as we need. We also take advantage of being able to set up different environment settings so that we can use the same test in our production, integration, and QA environments, easily."
    "This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments."
    "You can run it off the cloud and against different data centers. That's one of the plus points for most people for this product, as opposed to some other solutions."
    More Runscope [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "Unfortunately, because of this, I have to search for another solution that supports SOAP APIs, because Postman doesn't."
    "One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords."
    "One area that could be better is collection management."
    "The management of endpoints' headers sometimes conflicts with APIs that require information in the body, leading to difficulties."
    "The pricing should be adjusted for the Pro plan."
    "The performance needs to be improved."
    "If they could implement auto-validations and assertions from SoapUI, that would be a very good feature."
    "Postman Enterprise could enhance performance for very large collections and complex workspaces."
    More Postman Enterprise cons
    "There are not many options for scalability."
    "We would like to have an improved ability to share a set of tests across different environments (e.g., dev, stage, and prod)."
    "File upload is a big part of the products that we test. The lack of file upload in Runscope requires us to still use UI (Selenium) automated tests for these scenarios."
    "It would be nice to be able to generate API documentation."
    "We definitely make use of historical test results, especially when tracking more difficult issues such as timeouts. Per our test frequency (15 minutes) we often need to go back further than the last 100 test runs. We are aware that results further back in time are available through the Runscope API, however, it would be great if the dashboard allowed easy access to a larger amount of historical data."
    "Reliability. I would like to see more money invested in disaster recovery testing of the application. The product should be hosted across several AWS regions so if there are issues with an EC2 instance in a particular region, the whole application won't be affected. Once or twice a year there are issues with AWS that causes the reliability of the application to suffer."
    "Navigation can be a little tricky when changing run environments and switching between test run results and editing the tests. It would be nice if you could switch the environment for all tests in a Bucket to run, rather than having to change each test environment."
    "We would like the ability to configure Runscope behavior when a given test has its schedule modified. That is, in a non-production environment, we often need to pause a test (either by removing it from the schedule or adjusting its frequency) and this results in the automatic kick-off of this test in all other environments. We would like the ability to simply pause a test for a specific shared environment without causing additional tests to be started."
    More Runscope [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "I use the tool's free version."
    "I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."
    "I rate the price of Postman a four out of five."
    "We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license."
    "We do not pay any money for Postman."
    "It is free."
    "Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."
    "The solution has a licensing fee which might be prohibitive."
    More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice
    "Runscope pricing is unbeatable"
    "The price for the product is very reasonable for a team of more than four to five members."
    "Pricing is fair."
    "Having the different plans organized by team size, buckets, and requests per billing period works for our needs. Larger companies may need to take a close look at these elements."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    17%
    Insurance Company
    9%
    Computer Software Company
    9%
    Healthcare Company
    5%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business17
    Midsize Enterprise12
    Large Enterprise42
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business6
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
    Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
    Postman is much cheaper than the other tools. I am not aware of the current pricing for Postman because that's taken care of by the client; we just pay and they simply create options. On a per-pers...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Postman?
    I would like to see AI integration in Postman Enterprise. As I mentioned, I need mock servers at times, so it would be good if I can input my requirements in the mock server and it can itself creat...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 8% of the time
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 7% of the time
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 6% of the time
    Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 6% of the time
    Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 5% of the time
    More Postman Enterprise Competitors
    AlertSite vs Runscope [EOL] Logo
    AlertSite vs Runscope [EOL]
    Compared 57% of the time
    More Runscope [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Postman Enterprise
    April 2026
    Postman Enterprise reportDownload Postman Enterprise product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Runscope [EOL]
    April 2026
    Runscope [EOL] reportDownload Runscope [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    No data available
    CA Runscope
     

    Overview

    Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

    Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

    What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?
    • Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
    • Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
    • Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
    • Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
    • Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.
    What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?
    • Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
    • Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
    • Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

    In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

    Postman
    Information not available
    Broadcom
     

    Sample Customers

    PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
    Twilio, Microsoft, Adobe, Okta, Tesco, Charter Communications
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    April 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Postman, F5, SmartBear and others in API Monitoring Software. Updated: April 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best API Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all API Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.