No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Postman Enterprise vs Runscope [EOL] comparison

Postman and Broadcom are both solutions in the API Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 95% of Postman users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Postman Enterprise
Read 70 Postman Enterprise reviews
  • 6,299 Views
  • 315 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Runscope [EOL]
Read 11 Runscope [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

    Runscope EOL and Postman Enterprise compete in the API testing and monitoring space. Postman Enterprise holds an advantage, offering a more robust solution due to its enhanced features.

    Features: Postman Enterprise offers automated testing workflows, API documentation, and advanced collaboration features. Runscope EOL provided comprehensive API monitoring, internal team collaboration, and was simpler for smaller teams.

    Room for Improvement: Postman Enterprise could improve by simplifying its interface and reducing the learning curve. Runscope EOL needed stronger customer support, scalability, and a broader range of advanced features.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Postman Enterprise is straightforward to deploy and offers reliable customer support for large-scale operations. Runscope EOL was easier to deploy for small teams but lacked extensive support for larger enterprises.

    Pricing and ROI: Runscope EOL was more budget-friendly for startups, whereas Postman Enterprise, despite a higher cost, provides better ROI due to its comprehensive features and scalability.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed API Monitoring Software Report (Updated: May 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    May 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Postman Enterprise
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.9
    Number of Reviews
    70
    Ranking in other categories
    API Management (6th), API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), AI Software Development (6th)
    Runscope [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.8
    Number of Reviews
    11
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    RituRaj - PeerSpot reviewer
    RituRaj
    SDE 2 at Virtusa
    Centralized collaboration has transformed API testing and documentation across multiple teams
    In terms of improvement, the UI can sometimes feel heavy for larger collections in the workspaces. Additionally, performance may slow down with complex API projects, and pricing can be expensive for smaller teams. However, it is quite suitable for bigger teams. Other areas for improvement include better reporting and analytics dashboards, and more advanced native test environment features could enhance workflow, with smoother offline support and sync handling. Additionally, better performance for very large collections would be helpful, along with more intuitive navigation for enterprise-scale workspaces, stronger reporting analytics, easier management of permissions across large teams, and more flexible automation and testing report options would be beneficial. Small usability and performance improvements would make Postman Enterprise even more efficient for larger organizations. Postman Enterprise needs better performance optimization for large enterprises, more detailed analytics user reporting, improved API governance and audit visibility, simpler permissions and access control management, faster sync and loading times for larger collections, and more advanced built-in testing and reporting capabilities.
    Read full review
    Director5672 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Director5672
    Director of Engineering at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
    Enables us to monitor API endpoints to ensure everything is running
    I've noticed, once or twice, when there were some updates pushed by Runscope, at times it didn't refresh the pages. I was running it, there were multiple tests running at the same time, and it didn't update the webpage I was looking at. So I had to refresh it manually. Occasionally, it still happens. Another thing I have found is that the built-in editor for the scripts can be improved a lot. Instead of making such a basic editor, maybe include a little more so it is easier to look at things and debug. Finally, other than the Runscope documentation, I haven't seen too much elsewhere. I haven't seen a user community.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "We use it for REST API testing. Feature-wise, it is pretty lightweight. It is pretty fast, and we don't have to do a lot of things. We can just simply go and post our endpoint, and it gives different kinds of authorizations. We usually use authentication 2.0, which is the most common industry practice. So, it has the support for authorization through 2.0."
    "It's user-friendly and free, and anybody can learn it within five to seven minutes."
    "The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and user-friendly."
    "The variables part is good. We can easily define the variables and we don't have to manually do a change every time, it gets automatically updated."
    "It's easy to see different versions of responses."
    "Overall rating: Ten out of ten."
    "It helps me to test APIs independently. It also supports hosting."
    "This is an easy solution to manage."
    More Postman Enterprise pros
    "This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments."
    "It uses JavaScript which is easy."
    "We have the ability to populate environment variables using scripts, which allows us to keep the configuration mostly dynamic and avoid a lot of manual updates when something changes."
    "Valuable features include: Being able to add tests as sub-tests in a parent test for regression testing; notifications for tests that pass/fail; being able to customize expected results with assertions; being able to set tests to run daily."
    "You can run it off the cloud and against different data centers. That's one of the plus points for most people for this product, as opposed to some other solutions."
    "It is a cloud-based environment for building and executing tests, which allows me to focus on building, running, and reviewing test results."
    "Runscope is the best option for REST API automation."
    "This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments. Through integration with Slack, our development and DevOps teams are quickly aware of issues related to new changes deployed to non-production environments, which tightens our feedback loop during testing. Through integration with PagerDuty, our DevOps resources are able to reduce the adverse impact of a given production issue."
    More Runscope [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "The management of endpoints' headers sometimes conflicts with APIs that require information in the body, leading to difficulties."
    "When you try to code something and put it in the code, it's not useful."
    "I would like to have a code snippet where I can write a code and for the responses of the endpoints to be validated using my custom business conditions."
    "Integration should be improved with our continuation system because we use Azure DevOps separately."
    "The downside of using this solution is that you need to know JavaScript."
    "The main improvement needed is better integration with test management and other tools to allow a common dashboard for all testing metrics and details."
    "The scalability of the solution can be improved."
    "The pricing should be adjusted for the Pro plan."
    More Postman Enterprise cons
    "I've noticed, once or twice, when there were some updates pushed by Runscope, at times it didn't refresh the pages. I was running it, there were multiple tests running at the same time, and it didn't update the webpage I was looking at. So I had to refresh it manually. Occasionally, it still happens."
    "The initial setup included a lot of repetitive manual work."
    "There have been some Runscope outages in the last year. Though not many, Runscope availability is of critical importance in our production context."
    "If you forget to set the default environment during test creation, you have to go through every test and make sure that it is set to the environment that you prefer if using shared environments. If there was an option to force all tests within a bucket into a specific environment with one click, this would save a lot of time."
    "There are not many options for scalability."
    "The documentation of Runscope needs to be improved."
    "Reliability. I would like to see more money invested in disaster recovery testing of the application. The product should be hosted across several AWS regions so if there are issues with an EC2 instance in a particular region, the whole application won't be affected. Once or twice a year there are issues with AWS that causes the reliability of the application to suffer."
    "We would like the ability to configure Runscope behavior when a given test has its schedule modified. That is, in a non-production environment, we often need to pause a test (either by removing it from the schedule or adjusting its frequency) and this results in the automatic kick-off of this test in all other environments. We would like the ability to simply pause a test for a specific shared environment without causing additional tests to be started."
    More Runscope [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "This tool is open-source and free to download and use."
    "Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."
    "I am using the free option."
    "Postman is an open-source product. It is free to download from Google."
    "I rate the price of Postman a four out of five."
    "It is free."
    "The solution has a licensing fee which might be prohibitive."
    "We are using its free version."
    More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice
    "Pricing is fair."
    "The price for the product is very reasonable for a team of more than four to five members."
    "Having the different plans organized by team size, buckets, and requests per billing period works for our needs. Larger companies may need to take a close look at these elements."
    "Runscope pricing is unbeatable"
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    15%
    Computer Software Company
    8%
    Insurance Company
    8%
    Construction Company
    6%
    Construction Company
    23%
    Financial Services Firm
    21%
    Computer Software Company
    10%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business18
    Midsize Enterprise13
    Large Enterprise44
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business6
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
    Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
    When it comes to pricing, setup cost, and licensing, my experience indicates that the pricing is on the higher side, especially for smaller teams and growing organizations. However, enterprise lice...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Postman?
    In terms of improvement, the UI can sometimes feel heavy for larger collections in the workspaces. Additionally, performance may slow down with complex API projects, and pricing can be expensive fo...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 8% of the time
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 6% of the time
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 6% of the time
    MuleSoft API Manager vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    MuleSoft API Manager vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 5% of the time
    Apigee vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Apigee vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 5% of the time
    More Postman Enterprise Competitors
    AlertSite vs Runscope [EOL] Logo
    AlertSite vs Runscope [EOL]
    Compared 56% of the time
    More Runscope [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Postman Enterprise
    June 2026
    Postman Enterprise reportDownload Postman Enterprise product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Runscope [EOL]
    June 2026
    Runscope [EOL] reportDownload Runscope [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    No data available
    CA Runscope
     

    Overview

    Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

    Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

    What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?
    • Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
    • Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
    • Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
    • Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
    • Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.
    What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?
    • Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
    • Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
    • Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

    In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

    Postman
    Information not available
    Broadcom
     

    Sample Customers

    PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
    Twilio, Microsoft, Adobe, Okta, Tesco, Charter Communications
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    May 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Postman, F5, SmartBear and others in API Monitoring Software. Updated: May 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best API Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all API Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.