PractiTest vs TestRail comparison

PractiTest and IDERA are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. PractiTest is ranked #18, while IDERA is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. PractiTest holds a 2.8% mindshare in TMT, compared to IDERA’s 11.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PractiTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

260 Views
127 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 22 TestRail reviews

1,538 Views
677 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

PractiTest

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

TestRail and PractiTest are two prominent test management tools. TestRail leads in user satisfaction regarding features and customer service, while PractiTest's pricing and deployment are generally rated higher by users.

Features: TestRail is appreciated for its extensive reporting capabilities and effective integration with other tools. PractiTest excels in its customizable dashboards and traceability features. Users find TestRail's reporting more comprehensive, but PractiTest offers better customization.

Room for Improvement: TestRail users suggest enhancements in scalability and automation features. PractiTest users express the need for better performance speed and simplified navigation. Although both have areas needing improvement, TestRail’s automation and PractiTest's performance are the focal points.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestRail shows positive feedback on its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. PractiTest’s cloud-based deployment is quick, but its customer service receives mixed reviews. Thus, TestRail is preferred for support, whereas PractiTest wins in deployment time.

Pricing and ROI: TestRail's initial setup cost is seen as higher, but users report good long-term ROI. PractiTest offers competitive pricing upfront, and users also report a satisfactory ROI. PractiTest is more cost-effective initially, while TestRail provides better long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed PractiTest vs. TestRail Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. TestRail

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (21st)

TestRail

Ranking in Test Management Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of PractiTest is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestRail is 11.2%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

StuartBarker

Managing Director at Corecom Quality Engineering

A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities

I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira where the status of tests is not displayed (in Jira) due to I suspect security settings on the browser. In a large corporate environment, it is not easily changed. The support wasn't particularly helpful. It would be great if I could create custom reports, ideally with a tool designed specifically for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

"I use the solution for test management."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"The biggest advantage of using TestRail is its simplicity and intuitive interface."

"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."

"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."

"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."

"The ability to time test runs gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."

"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."

"With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins."

"Better prediction of text."

"The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links."

"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."

"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."

"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?

I use the solution for test management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

Pricing is reasonable for TestRail. It offers good value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

TestRail lacks the functionality to map test cases to requirements and risks. While integration with another tool is a workaround, it doesn't fully meet my needs. Additionally, I would appreciate A...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 33% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 29% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 23% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs PractiTest

Compared 16% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 26% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 15% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 15% of the time

CucumberStudio vs TestRail

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs TestRail

Compared 8% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

June 2025

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

No data available

TestRail by Gurock

Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

IDERA

Sample Customers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. TestRail

June 2025

Free Report: PractiTest vs. TestRail

Find out what your peers are saying about PractiTest vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PractiTest vs. TestRail report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.