PractiTest vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

PractiTest and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. PractiTest is ranked #17, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9. PractiTest holds a 3.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to UiPath’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PractiTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

723 Views
405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

3,519 Views
457 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

PractiTest

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PractiTest and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (22nd)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Test Management Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (5th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of PractiTest is 3.0%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 2.7%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	2.7%
PractiTest	3.0%
Other	94.3%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"Some of the best features I find with UiPath Test Cloud include the creation of end-to-end workflows with API integration, which was particularly useful for my use case, allowing me to connect APIs seamlessly within the defined workflows in UiPath."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"The initial setup of UiPath Test Cloud is a mixed bag; while setting up the tool is easy, building the tests is always tedious."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"Its price is a bit high."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 11% of the time

TFS vs PractiTest

Compared 11% of the time

Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs PractiTest

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs PractiTest

Compared 5% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ACCELQ Automate vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

March 2026

Download PractiTest product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

February 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2026

Free Report: PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.