PractiTest vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

PractiTest and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. PractiTest is ranked #17, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. PractiTest holds a 3.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to UiPath’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PractiTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

1,149 Views
609 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

4,321 Views
605 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

PractiTest

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PractiTest and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (21st)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Test Management Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of PractiTest is 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 2.3%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	2.3%
PractiTest	3.0%
Other	94.7%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a good solution for a global transnational company."

"In addition, we found PractiTest very user-friendly and customizable."

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

"Helped organise the manual test cases so they were documented correctly, which was invaluable as it allowed for reviewing and improving of test scripts so they could be followed by a number of different people which helped with resourcing."

"PractiTest gives us the opportunity to control the testing process efficiently and saves us a lot of time that we had to spend while using other tools."

"Since we started using this product, our organization's testing functionality has really improved."

"Converting a couple of these test plans into PractiTest was amazing and made a world of difference."

"Technical support of PractiTest is awesome. They are always ready to help in any time zone, which makes them stand out from others."

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"The document understanding is good."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time."

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

"PractiTest practically requires a lot of sandboxing, demos with their team, and online tutorials."

"It does not offer server installation, only software as a service."

"There are some features that I would like added: an option to export a part of tests with steps."

"Needs to improve adding the ability to run tests multiple times and setting different parameters."

"Yes, there are times when server is very slow in response."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

"The initial setup of UiPath Test Cloud is a mixed bag; while setting up the tool is easy, building the tests is always tedious."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

Construction Company

University

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 11% of the time

TFS vs PractiTest

Compared 10% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 9% of the time

Original Software Qualify vs PractiTest

Compared 8% of the time

TestRail vs PractiTest

Compared 7% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

LEAPWORK vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2026

Download PractiTest product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

PractiTest is a comprehensive test management tool designed to streamline QA processes for businesses. It integrates multiple testing activities into a single platform, enhancing test case management, reporting, and collaboration.

Designed for tech-savvy teams, PractiTest provides an end-to-end solution for managing testing efforts across diverse projects. Its intuitive interface allows teams to customize workflows, link requirements to tests, and efficiently manage defects. PractiTest supports integrations with CI/CD tools, offering seamless data import and export, which aids in maintaining a cohesive testing workflow. Its emphasis on in-depth reporting and traceability ensures teams can track project progress and quality efficiently.

What are the key features of PractiTest?

Test Management: Centralizes test cases, facilitating easier creation, execution, and maintenance.
Requirements Management: Links tests to requirements, providing visibility into coverage and functionality.
Defect Tracking: Allows real-time tracking and management of defects, streamlining the bug-fixing process.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized dashboards that provide insights and monitor key metrics.
Integrations: Connects seamlessly with external tools and platforms to support continuous integration and delivery.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Collaboration: Teams can work together more effectively, thanks to centralized data and communication tools.
Efficiency Boost: Automation and integration features reduce manual tasks, saving time and resources.
Enhanced Reporting: Comprehensive reports help identify trends and make informed decisions quickly.
Cost Effectiveness: Streamlined processes and improved productivity can lead to significant cost savings.

In sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology, PractiTest is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards and compliance. These industries leverage its traceability and compliance features to meet regulatory requirements while maintaining high-quality software standards.

PractiTest

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Free Report: PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PractiTest vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.