QAD Cloud ERP vs SAP ERP comparison

QAD and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. QAD is ranked #15 with an average rating of 10.0, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.5. QAD holds a 1.3% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 11.6% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of QAD users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAP users who would recommend it.

QAD Cloud ERP

Read 3 QAD Cloud ERP reviews

710 Views
667 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

SAP ERP

Read 108 SAP ERP reviews

10,532 Views
9,058 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

QAD Cloud ERP

SAP ERP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAP ERP and QAD Cloud ERP are competing products in the enterprise resource planning category. SAP ERP appears to have the upper hand in customization and scalability, appealing to larger enterprises, while QAD Cloud ERP is favored for industry-specific solutions and ease of use.

Features: SAP ERP offers comprehensive modules for finance, human resources, and supply chain management, along with robust analytics and reporting tools. It supports extensive customization to meet various business needs. QAD Cloud ERP focuses on manufacturing and supply chain sectors with tailored features and streamlined processes, catering effectively to specific industries and delivering ease of use through its industry-specific design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QAD Cloud ERP provides a cloud-based deployment that simplifies installation and offers flexibility, supported by commendable support services for quick resolutions. SAP ERP, offering both on-premise and cloud solutions, has a complex deployment process that can be time-consuming but is backed by extensive support and training programs.

Pricing and ROI: SAP ERP involves higher upfront and maintenance costs but offers significant ROI for large-scale implementations through its functionalities and customization capabilities. QAD Cloud ERP typically presents lower initial costs with quicker ROI for small to medium-sized enterprises due to its efficient, industry-focused modules.

To learn more, read our detailed QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

QAD Cloud ERP

Ranking in ERP

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP ERP

Ranking in ERP

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of QAD Cloud ERP is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP ERP is 11.6%, down from 20.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP ERP	11.6%
QAD Cloud ERP	1.3%
Other	87.1%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Abbas Hirkani

Sr. Project Manager at YASH Technologies

Quick implementation brings comprehensive workflow management and efficient regulation handling

One of the major advantages of QAD Cloud ERP is related to the easy and quick implementation that I have found the most valuable. The entire application of QAD Cloud ERP itself is very valuable for my customers. My impression of the advanced supply chain management feature in QAD Cloud ERP is that it's a very comfortable tool and, if rightly configured, it really helps the business to have clear visibility of the entire supply chain. My impression of the compliance management in QAD Cloud ERP is that it has reduced many overheads of doing manual compliance, and it is quite easily manageable; it is connected with the regulatory authorities, making it a fantastic tool. The positive impact my customers have experienced from using QAD Cloud ERP includes easy integration with multiple different applications, connectivity with regulatory authorities and banks, having bank drivers for easy payments and receiving money, and it has fantastic web UI reporting, which satisfies many different stakeholders within the entire organization worldwide.

Read full review

Achmad Dimyati

IT Service Management Team Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Long-term adaptation and evolution meets changing technology trends

SAP ERP is not really real-time. We use the HANA database which is supposed to be memory data in memory, but we are still not very happy. It is supposed to be real-time and come very quickly, but in reality, it still takes time to run. That is why we use BW of SAP, Business Objects, and now we have moved to the Analytic Cloud where we start using predictive AI. SAP recently implemented Databricks, and they started investing significantly in the analytic environment. SAP ERP has been left behind as they moved to S/4HANA with the HANA database. They restructured the whole table structure of SAP ERP, introduced simple finance, simple logistics, and moved HR to SuccessFactors. They have the BTP layer where they manage everything from integration to master data management. The challenge with SAP is that they move very fast to different products and buy different products. It requires significant investment and many skills to catch up because all of these have different sets of technology. The fundamental has changed differently. It is not monolithic anymore but different products under one name, SAP. You have to buy it model by model for additional models. Products such as SuccessFactors, Ariba for procure to pay, Concur for travel, and Facility Management use totally different technology. They try to integrate with each other, but it remains a challenge for SAP to make them have the same management, technology, and operational approach.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The positive impact my customers have experienced from using QAD Cloud ERP includes easy integration with multiple different applications, connectivity with regulatory authorities and banks, having bank drivers for easy payments and receiving money, and it has fantastic web UI reporting, which satisfies many different stakeholders within the entire organization worldwide."

"It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."

"The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."

"The valuable feature of SAP ERP is that everything is connected and under one roof, creating a unified system."

"The implementation is very straightforward."

"It is easier to migrate to SAP ERP from a legacy system. We have different products for data services, and it is easier to migrate to SAP ERP as compared to other solutions. Stability is one of the main features of SAP. What makes SAP ERP better than others is that SAP has taken into consideration the business processes of different industries, such as manufacturing. They have done the research, and they know what are the best practices. They have already implemented these best practices in SAP ERP, which are readily available for a client. Clients can also customize it based on their individual needs."

"They provide a full service."

"The accounting module's record and report process is closely integrated with almost every other process."

"SAP ERP's interface is pretty easy nowadays, as it has evolved over time and has been made as user-friendly as a person would like it."

"SAP ERP is particularly strong in manufacturing, from production planning to plant maintenance, then Material Management itself, and managing warehouse management and inventory control."

"The solution can easily be standardized across processes."

More SAP ERP pros

Cons

"They could improve by moving away from the architecture of Progress 4GL as currently they are undergoing a very drastic change by redoing the entire application with Java and web-based technologies, projected to be released by 2026 with the incorporation of analytics, process intelligence, and AI to help business users."

"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."

"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"There are a lot of manual tasks that are used by a lot of people, so it is a very good candidate for RPA."

"The reporting could be improved, such as the casework, production, and activity reports. Our consultants in a subsidiary enterprise have requested that we develop a new production report. They could also improve production, financial, and HR analysis."

"I always prefer using an S/4HANA system."

"It's difficult to code; structured language is difficult."

"Lacks sufficient technical support with slow response times."

"We will not make any major changes, and we are not expecting any enhancements or new features from SAP because they already have a new solution. No development is happening on SAP ERP because SAP has come up with a new version called SAP S/4HANA, which is memory-based technology. We are planning to upgrade to SAP S/4HANA, but we don't know when it will happen. We are in the preparation phase."

"I would like to see more integration with other partners. Some of our customers already use specific or in-house applications for their business processes. They do not want to replace those applications."

More SAP ERP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It could always be cheaper. They don't have a very easy model of licensing, but large entities would get the upper hand in negotiating the license."

"When we talk about pricing it is expensive. On a scale of one to ten, it would rank a two. There are no additional fees but the user licenses are high."

"I don't know the price, but I know its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"SAP is a bit on the costly side, but they also provide support and other things. We are paying for licenses and the use of the cloud."

"I rate the product's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap or affordable, and ten is really expensive. The solution is expensive."

"My company makes early payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product. There are no additional costs apart from the charges paid toward the subscription-based license offered by SAP."

"We pay annually for the use of this solution."

"SAP ERP is expensive."

More SAP ERP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Performing Arts

Transportation Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

University

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	77

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with QAD Cloud ERP?

Areas of QAD Cloud ERP that could be improved include the ongoing enhancements they are making; it has grown significantly over my last 25 years, incorporating many different business needs, and th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for QAD Cloud ERP?

My customers usually use QAD Cloud ERP mainly in manufacturing from automobile industries, specifically tier two and tier three manufacturing companies, not the tier one auto manufacturers. They ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering QAD Cloud ERP?

My impression of the modular architecture of QAD Cloud ERP is that it's a 4GL, Progress 4GL based database system, so it is a server-client technology as well as web-based, making it a really conve...

See all answers

Is Anaplan better than SAP ERP?

There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time co...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP ERP?

The solution has made the most significant impact on our human resources function, specifically in HR operations and HR analytics. One feature of SAP ERP that I found most valuable is its use of co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP ERP?

I do not know how to give feedback regarding SAP ERP's analytics tools. The usage of analytics tools is not very popular among our customers, as some functions are not very modern. Customer study t...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP S/4HANA vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 32% of the time

Epicor ERP vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 14% of the time

IFS Cloud Platform vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 11% of the time

Epicor iScala vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 6% of the time

Infor LX vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 6% of the time

More QAD Cloud ERP Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs SAP ERP

Compared 11% of the time

Infor LN vs SAP ERP

Compared 8% of the time

Infor M3 vs SAP ERP

Compared 8% of the time

Anaplan vs SAP ERP

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs SAP ERP

Compared 7% of the time

More SAP ERP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

QAD Cloud ERP

January 2026

Download QAD Cloud ERP product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP ERP

January 2026

Download SAP ERP product report

Also Known As

MFG/PRO

No data available

Overview

QAD Cloud ERP is an enterprise resource planning solution designed exclusively for global manufacturing. It supports best-in-class, industry-specific business processes and flexible deployment options.

QAD

SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.

SAP

Sample Customers

Tower International, Kendra Scott

B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.

Buyer's Guide

QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP

December 2025

Free Report: QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP

Find out what your peers are saying about QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.