Qlik Replicate vs SAP Analytics Hub comparison

Qlik and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.0. Qlik holds a 1.6% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,009 Views
2,927 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Analytics Hub

Read 8 SAP Analytics Hub reviews

1,562 Views
703 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

SAP Analytics Hub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Replicate and SAP Analytics Hub are competitors in the data management and analytics domain. Qlik Replicate's pricing and support strengths give it an advantage, but SAP Analytics Hub's extensive analytics features make it favorable for advanced analytics solutions.

Features: Qlik Replicate's key features are real-time data replication, extensive platform compatibility, and user-friendly data integration. SAP Analytics Hub concentrates on centralized analytics management, offering a unified space for sharing insights and emphasizing analytics content orchestration.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate could enhance its AI capabilities, improve handling of complex data structures, and expand its integration options beyond current platforms. SAP Analytics Hub needs quicker deployment processes, more competitive pricing, and simplified user navigation to enhance its usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate is known for its easy deployment and comprehensive support, beneficial for businesses seeking rapid implementation. SAP Analytics Hub, while more complex to deploy, integrates robustly with SAP ecosystems, suiting businesses that prefer deeper embedding with SAP tools.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate offers a more attractive pricing strategy and faster ROI due to lower initial costs and swift deployment. SAP Analytics Hub, despite its higher setup costs, provides significant value through advanced analytics capabilities and extensive SAP tool integration, prioritizing long-term analytics investment over immediate cost-saving.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Analytics Hub Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Analytics Hub

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Analytics Hub

Ranking in Data Integration

43rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.6%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Analytics Hub is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.6%
SAP Analytics Hub	0.7%
Other	97.7%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

Nitesh Agrawal

Director & Co-Owner at InfraBeat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Integration and security have improved, but search functionality and clarity of future direction need enhancement

The search function in SAP Analytics Hub is not effective. When speaking about integration with various analytic sources, for example, if I wanted to send the data from SAP BW or B4HANA to a data lake, we used to earlier use the Open Data Hub or Analytics Hub. Nowadays, we are using the Data Sphere integrators available with Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. The search capability could be better, and SAP needs to come out with a clear roadmap for the solution going ahead, as they have not yet provided that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."

"The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature."

"We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments."

"The most useful functions of Qlik Replicate are the data manipulation to transformations."

"It's very user-friendly when it comes to settings and configuration. It also offers very detailed logging about warnings and errors."

"Great with replicating and updating records."

"The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data applications."

"The CDC and the flexibility to use QVD as a source are the most valuable features of Qlik Replicate."

More Qlik Replicate pros

"As a partner, I can mention something positive about SAP Analytics Hub: its products are tightly integrated, so the business context of data is retained in the analytics solution, and that's the main advantage."

"What I like best about this solution is that it is built into the SAP line, making it easier to integrate with other SAP products."

"Data consistency is also a notable feature; the system takes care of data consistency, so you don't need to handle it manually."

"SAP Analytics Hub offers a user-friendly interface with effortless configuration, seamless updates, and real-time availability of information. It avoids the complexities associated with batch processing, providing a smooth and efficient experience."

"For report scheduling, I always prefer SAP because it has the most powerful scheduling features, like sending reports to more than 1,000 customers per day. That option is not as good in Microsoft BI and in Tableau it only exists as an add-on option."

"This product provides good reports using a single pane of glass."

"The platform's main benefit is its integration with SAP ERP data. It’s effective for data integration and integrity."

Cons

"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."

"There is complexity involved in the licensing part of this system."

"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."

"Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases."

"The disadvantage is people are not going for this license because it is not marketed properly."

"The UI and data version control can be improved."

"In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst."

"I am not very comfortable with Qlik support as it often goes in loops. Even priority tickets, which should be resolved in minutes, can take days."

More Qlik Replicate cons

"The interface can be simplified because it is not a user-friendly experience."

"Pricing and support are integrated into the system. However, the support process can be challenging, particularly when navigating the SAP support site, which lacks user-friendliness and ease of access."

"The platform could easily integrate with other ERP data solutions. Additionally, it should be faster compared to competitors in the cloud space."

"The analytics part of SAP has not been that good up until now. They're still in the infant stage and development is still going on. SAP has some cloud analytics and they're trying to configure it in Lumira, but it's not that good at this point."

"The technical support for Analytics Hub is limited and could be improved."

"Faster implementation of new functions for the new product is an area of improvement in SAP Analytics Hub."

"The search capability could be better, and SAP needs to come out with a clear roadmap for the solution going ahead, as they have not yet provided that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"They are pursuing a highly assertive approach to target businesses of all sizes within the industry."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings.Other areas of Qlik Replicate that could be improved include its ability to serve as a single point tool,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My usual use cases for Qlik Replicate involve my previous organization and my current organization. I can provide my current experience. As an Australian energy provider, we have a lot of operation...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Analytics Hub?

The product is expensive. The cost starts from $1,000,000 per year. Moreover, there are additional costs involved for customization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Analytics Hub?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SAP Analytics Hub?

When speaking about integration with various analytic sources, for example, if I wanted to send the data from SAP BW or B4HANA to a data lake, we used to earlier use the Open Data Hub or Analytics ...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Data Services vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

SAS Access vs SAP Analytics Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Analytics Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs SAP Analytics Hub

Compared 7% of the time

Teradata vs SAP Analytics Hub

Compared 7% of the time

Upsolver vs SAP Analytics Hub

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Analytics Hub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

March 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Analytics Hub

February 2026

Download SAP Analytics Hub product report

Also Known As

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

No data available

Overview

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

SAP Analytics Hub simplifies access to analytics scattered across multiple heterogeneous environments. The solution recommends the best analytics to fit personalized needs and grants users with actionable insights without compromising agility.

SAP

Sample Customers

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

STIB-MIVB

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Analytics Hub

March 2026

Free Report: Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Analytics Hub

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Analytics Hub and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Analytics Hub report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.