

QlikView and Zoho Analytics compete in the business intelligence tools category. Zoho Analytics has the upper hand for smaller businesses and those already using Zoho products due to its affordability and ease of use.
Features: QlikView's notable features include patented Associative Query Logic (AQL) for fast in-memory analysis, a built-in ETL engine, and extensive partner networks aiding in self-service reporting. Zoho Analytics offers strong integration capabilities with APIs, affordability, and seamless cloud access, making it an excellent choice for integrating with other Zoho products.
Room for Improvement: QlikView's scalability issues arise from its dependency on RAM and the need for skilled IT professionals for implementation. Its scripting and reporting require a more intuitive design. Zoho Analytics could enhance its analytical capabilities by adding more statistical functions and graph types, and improve its graphical features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView is mainly deployed on-premises with robust support through consultants, although the availability can vary by location. Zoho Analytics offers flexible cloud and hybrid deployment options and is lauded for excellent customer service with proactive follow-ups and direct client communication.
Pricing and ROI: QlikView is considered expensive with varied licensing models and additional costs for features like ERP integration. Its ROI is challenging to quantify but generally seen in time savings. Zoho Analytics, with a straightforward and economical pricing model, offers a rapid ROI with flexible monthly fees based on usage, making it appealing to smaller businesses.
The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.
The integration with Zoho People is particularly important because I can access real-time data at any time, including what's happening in the last minute.
After incorporating Zoho Analytics, now all our decisions come from its reviews.
Any time I've integrated customer data using Zoho, I've received great feedback and referrals, and Zoho has gotten me referrals and more customers.
I would rate the customer support a solid 10.
I am totally satisfied with technical support from Qlik.
The support team doesn't have full awareness of the system capabilities.
Zoho support provides assistance through live chat to guide us.
If you need help with any issue you face, you can directly call them.
If you want better performance with a larger volume of data, you can simply add an additional server.
Zoho Analytics can easily adapt to our needs when they grow, and you don't need much knowledge to adapt it; even basic Excel knowledge is sufficient.
You can utilize URL features to redirect users to their records in Zoho CRM or Zoho Desk with just a click.
Zoho Analytics is scalable.
A major missing feature compared to Power BI is the ability to create multiple DAX measures or row-level context, which would be useful for showing custom profit and loss statements.
The stability and reliability of Zoho Analytics have been good over time.
The stability and reliability of the product is crucial for optimal performance.
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.
It would be beneficial to have AI or ML features in QlikView.
The collaborative features of Zoho Analytics have faced one issue: they have tried to reduce the sync time with most Zoho applications, but even with CRM, the sync still takes one hour.
While Power BI uses Power Query, an intuitive and powerful tool that allows data manipulation in any way, Zoho Analytics has limitations.
Having to pay for 25 users when only 11 are needed creates an issue with the pricing structure.
The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.
I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.
The annual subscription cost of Zoho Analytics is equivalent to about half of the monthly cost of tools such as Tableau or Power BI.
The pricing for Zoho Analytics is actually cheaper than the competitors for the kind of service they provide.
The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.
Building metrics using simple language, similar to what you have in Excel, is what I have found most valuable in QlikView.
The AI called Zia in Zoho Analytics is extremely useful. Whenever I build a chart or dashboard, I can generate a summary of insights using this AI tool, which is very convenient for both leadership and manager level teams to understand the data concepts.
The best feature is that in the same tool, we can use SQL and business intelligence capabilities.
Regarding integration capabilities, I have found Zoho Analytics' 100+ integrations very effective in consolidating data from various sources.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Zoho Analytics | 2.3% |
| QlikView | 4.0% |
| Other | 93.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 73 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 76 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
QlikView enhances data analysis with its associative data model and rapid in-memory processing, providing dynamic dashboards and robust visualization, while efficient data integration allows connections to multiple sources.
QlikView offers powerful analytics and insight generation capabilities through its integration with Salesforce, enabling real-time sales data access. Its customizable dashboards are complemented by scripting for complex calculations and QVDs for performance optimization. Designed to be user-friendly, it supports ETL processes and diverse data browsing, allowing users to interact with data intuitively. However, there is room for improving licensing complexities, scalability, and self-service functionality. Additional enhancements are desired in visualization, integration with Qlik Sense, and predictive analytics support.
What are QlikView's key features?QlikView finds use in building business intelligence dashboards across sectors, integrating with Salesforce for analytics, supporting financial planning, and tracking sales. Its intuitive interface aids manufacturing companies in KPI monitoring and informs commercial decisions. The tool enhances reporting, ETL processes, and diverse data source integration, facilitating offline data access.
Zoho Analytics provides a robust platform for data visualization and analysis, integrating seamlessly with Zoho applications and external APIs to facilitate efficient data management and reporting.
Zoho Analytics stands out with its intuitive web-based interface that simplifies creating graphs, pivot tables, and interactive dashboards. It empowers businesses with powerful AI features like Zia, supporting over 100 data connectors for comprehensive analytics. The platform enhances decision-making through predictive analysis and automation, promoting efficient teamwork and data management. While it excels in many areas, users note some limitations in data visualization and report customization, complexity in query language, and the need for better support and improved external data connectivity. Enhancements in these areas could further elevate its functionality and user satisfaction.
What features set Zoho Analytics apart?In financial, sales, and CRM analytics, Zoho Analytics is utilized for process improvement by consolidating data from sources like Zoho CRM, People, and SalesIQ. It aids organizations in forecasting, monitoring trends, optimizing operations, and analyzing HR data. Companies benefit from its ability to present real-time reports and visualizations, supporting informed business activities.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.