Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qualitia Automation Studio vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualitia Automation Studio
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (33rd)
Selenium HQ
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (7th), Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Qualitia Automation Studio is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.9%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Selenium HQ, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 3.3% mindshare, down 4.0% since last year.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qualitia Automation Studio0.9%
Tricentis Tosca14.1%
OpenText Functional Testing6.6%
Other78.4%
Test Automation Tools
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Selenium HQ3.3%
Tricentis Tosca12.9%
BrowserStack7.5%
Other76.3%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SY
Head Of Solutions at Test Yantra Software Solutions
Testing automation solution that is scriptless and is competitively priced compared to other solutions
The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it. Within four weeks, my team was up and running. This was the shortest possible ramp-up that we completed in my entire career The integrations for this…
Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Manager consultant - Digital assurance Services at adrosonic
Automation in testing processes sees improvement with multi-browser support and easier website interactions
Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks. The tool could simplify object identification, enabling users to generate XPaths without requiring detailed DOM understanding. Additionally, an automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open source and has multiple languages and browser support. It's very useful."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are that it is free and allows using any programming language."
"Selenium is a valuable tool for web testing, and it integrates easily with frameworks like the Gauge framework, making it easier than others. It supports different programming languages, including Java and JavaScript."
"Due to its popularity, you can find pretty much any answer in open discussions from the community."
"I believe Selenium HQ to be the best solution in the market for automating web applications"
"It is a good automation tool."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is picking up and entering values from web pages."
"It supports multiple processes, which is great."
 

Cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"For people that don't know about technology, maybe it's difficult to use."
"The solution can be improved by providing better reporting logs."
"I have found that at times the tool does not catch the class features of website content correctly. The product's AWS configuration is also hard."
"We do not have enough resources or enough people to employ and hire. So, I'm hiring whoever I find, and they don't always have enough technical knowledge to operate Selenium."
"There is a need for an auto-healing feature that can address script failures due to changes in the front end."
"It would be better if it accommodated non-techy end-users. I think it's still a product for developers. That's why it's not common for end-users, and especially for RPA activities or tasks. It's hard to automate tasks for end-users. If it will be easier, more user-friendly, and so on, perhaps it can be more interesting for this kind of user."
"There are stability issues with Internet Explorer only."
"An improvement to Selenium HQ would be the inclusion of a facility to work on Shadow DOM."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."
"Selenium is open-source, so there are no setup costs associated with it."
"This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
"Selenium HQ is a free and open-source solution and is supported by Google."
"Selenium HQ is a free, open-source solution."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"This is an open-source product so there is no cost other than manpower."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business41
Midsize Enterprise33
Large Enterprise51
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
I will give an eight for my satisfaction with the pricing and licensing costs of Selenium HQ.
What needs improvement with Selenium HQ?
Some improvements can be implemented as compared to Playwright, which is why I rate it seven out of ten.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SeleniumHQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.