Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs StackHawk comparison

Rapid7 and StackHawk are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. Rapid7 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while StackHawk is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. Rapid7 holds a 5.7% mindshare in DAST, compared to StackHawk’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of StackHawk users who would recommend it.

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Read 20 Rapid7 InsightAppSec reviews

2,888 Views
1,213 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

StackHawk

Read 2 StackHawk reviews

355 Views
355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

StackHawk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightAppSec and StackHawk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Observability (19th)

StackHawk

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 InsightAppSec is 5.7%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StackHawk is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Rapid7 InsightAppSec	5.7%
StackHawk	1.7%
Other	92.6%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Shritam Bhowmick

Vulnerability Management Lead at garrett

Provides reliable applications security but needs better integration options

There are areas for improvements regarding false positives. Integration capabilities are lacking, as options for integrations with other tools such as SNOW, Jira, or other integration tools are not sufficient in Rapid7 InsightAppSec. The user interface sometimes has glitches, which may prevent appropriate results during navigation, and even when we get appropriate results, it can be impossible to export them to CSV records or download files. Regarding scalability, Rapid7 InsightAppSec is not a scalable solution for our industry due to limited integration capabilities. Rapid7 relies on another tool called InsightConnect, which requires additional investment, detracting from scalability. Another area that needs improvement is the integration of AI capabilities into the platform. Both Rapid7 InsightAppSec and InsightVM need to advance in that area. In terms of behavioral and pattern recognition, identifying complex attacks such as SQL, blind SQL, JSON, and LDAP injections often results in 94% false positives. This necessitates improvement in their behavioral-based analytics feature.

Read full review

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna

Vulnerability visibility has improved across microservices but integration still needs refinement

StackHawk can be improved in the way that it is integrated, as at the very beginning, the idea was to, within the pipeline, mount the different resources that our microservices needed to start to run. For example, if we have a service that needed Redis, maybe Kafka, or a database to initialize, we did need to have a Docker Compose file, get up those services, and after that, do the analysis. It didn't have that; it wasn't reachable at the very beginning and it wasn't that good as we expected. But at some point, we decided to mount it as an agent in the Docker file, and it was waiting for new jobs. It was even better, and when we figured out how to integrate it within our EKS cluster, suddenly we started reaching to the services, knowing what was going on, and everything related to security. As long as we have a P2T to our QA site or cluster, we do not have garbage in our databases, but StackHawk does put a little information, a garbage information, doing their job. That's the main area I'm focusing on right now regarding needed improvements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very robust solution."

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is a good product for dynamic application security testing, providing neat reports that include validation actions and helping to generate web application firewall rules for web applications."

"When considering DAST, it is not attributed to a singular feature but rather the capabilities of the engine that provides a genuine penetration testing experience and delivers insightful reports."

"The automatic automation of the automated authorization to the SCANNET environment is valuable."

"The reporting functionality is excellent."

"It's very easy to use and user-friendly, and it does the job."

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec helps us in both regulatory compliance and in strengthening our security posture."

"The templates feature is very easy; you just choose the kind of attack you want on your web application, and you run it against that template and receive a report, which is great."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec pros

"StackHawk has positively impacted my organization by introducing an automated process that did not exist previously, and it helped the company achieve PCI certification."

"StackHawk has positively impacted my organization by giving us a new vision of how vulnerabilities were seen, as we now have more visibility in that matter."

Cons

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement in detecting phishing pages."

"In terms of behavioral and pattern recognition, identifying complex attacks such as SQL, blind SQL, JSON, and LDAP injections often results in 94% false positives."

"The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange."

"The reporting is definitely an aspect of the solution that's in need of some work. We found that we'd try to use widgets, but often getting them to work for us wasn't very clear. They need to be more user friendly or offer better instructions."

"There is room for improvement in the response time of customer service and support levels."

"The performance can be improved."

"The number of web applications we can scan is limited."

"The only concern I have with Rapid7 is that it does not provide enough information about vulnerabilities within AppSec."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec cons

"StackHawk can be improved in the way that it is integrated, as at the very beginning, the idea was to, within the pipeline, mount the different resources that our microservices needed to start to run."

"On a scale of one to ten, I would rate StackHawk an eight, only because I wish the product was a little less expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."

"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."

"The price of this product is very cheap."

"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."

"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

Customers sometimes experience issues with performance. One thing that I recall is that most customers often want to have reporting as per their customized dashboard. This needs to be improved beca...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

I usually recommend this solution for financial institutions. Banks and financial institutions need this solution mostly because they have to follow stringent compliance advisory requirements, so t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

I have not heard any complaints. I do not have any recommendations because customers were initially worried about the number of scans they used to perform, and now it has been enhanced or it will s...

See all answers

What needs improvement with StackHawk?

I cannot think of anything I would add to StackHawk, with the possible exception of adding any additional code bases that might be out there. I am thinking about a situation where a company might b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StackHawk?

My main use case for StackHawk is primarily as a PCI requirement for DAST. As a quick specific example of how I use StackHawk for that PCI requirement, it is one of the controls that sits alongside...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering StackHawk?

StackHawk is deployed in my organization in the public cloud using the configuration on their site. I use AWS as my cloud provider. I rate this product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Invicti vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 13% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 12% of the time

AppCheck vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 12% of the time

Veracode vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 6% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs StackHawk

Compared 48% of the time

More StackHawk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

June 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightAppSec product report

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

June 2026

Download StackHawk product report

Also Known As

InsightAppSec

No data available

Overview

Rapid7 InsightAppSec is a cloud-based security tool offering robust web scanning capabilities with a user-friendly interface and seamless integration. It enhances dynamic application security testing through customizable modules, providing comprehensive reports and remediation guidance.

InsightAppSec delivers dynamic application security testing with features like Attack Replay and a centralized dashboard for vulnerability insights. It supports flexible deployment options and simplifies scheduling frequent scans. The tool's intuitive graphical interface and extensive scanning coverage make it valuable for identifying vulnerabilities in web applications, APIs, and e-commerce sites, ensuring compliance. However, improvements are needed in detection accuracy, reporting options, and integrations with external tools like WAF and ticketing systems. There is a need for better scan management, support for mobile applications, customized reporting options, pricing flexibility, improved support, and AI integration.

What are the key features of InsightAppSec?

Seamless Integration: Easily integrates within SDLC for automated scans.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers an intuitive graphical experience.
Robust Web Scanning: Provides extensive vulnerability scanning of web applications and APIs.
Customizable Attack Modules: Tailors testing to meet specific security needs.
Attack Replay: Facilitates re-testing of potential vulnerabilities for accuracy.
Centralized Dashboard: Offers comprehensive insights into vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users look for?

Comprehensive Reports: Delivers detailed insights into security vulnerabilities.
Remediation Guidance: Provides actionable advice to fix identified vulnerabilities.
Scalability: Supports growth by handling increased demands efficiently.
Extensive Coverage: Ensures thorough security testing across multiple platforms.
Flexible Deployment: Adapts to different operational environments.

Industries rely on InsightAppSec for vulnerability scanning to secure web applications, APIs, and e-commerce platforms. Its integration within the SDLC aids in automating scans during development. While limitations exist with certain tool integrations, its cloud-based engine and effective reporting make it essential for internal and external application security assurance.

Rapid7

StackHawk provides a dynamic application security testing tool designed to identify and fix vulnerabilities in modern CI/CD workflows quickly. It seamlessly integrates into developers' pipelines to deliver real-time feedback, helping teams prioritize and address application security efficiently.

Known for its developer-first approach, StackHawk empowers teams to conduct proactive security testing at every stage of the software development lifecycle. It offers robust scanning capabilities that automatically integrate into build pipelines, ensuring security checks are part of the development process from the outset. This makes it easier for developers to identify issues early, reducing the potential for vulnerabilities in production. StackHawk integrates with leading CI/CD and DevOps tools, facilitating smooth adoption into existing workflows.

What are the key features of StackHawk?

Seamless CI/CD Integration: Easily integrates with existing pipelines for efficient security checks.
Automated Scanning: Conducts automatic scans to highlight vulnerabilities in real-time.
DevOps Tool Compatibility: Aligns with popular DevOps tools to streamline processes.
Actionable Reporting: Provides comprehensive reports with clear remediation steps.
Developer-Centric Approach: Designed specifically for developers to ensure easy adoption.

What benefits should users look for in StackHawk reviews?

Time-Saving: Speeds up detection and fixing of security flaws in the development cycle.
Improved Security Posture: Enhances the application security presence with minimal effort.
Cost-Effective: Reduces the risks of expensive breaches by identifying vulnerabilities early.
Enhanced Collaboration: Encourages collaboration between security and development teams.

StackHawk is invaluable in industries such as finance and healthcare, where regulatory compliance and data security are paramount. Integrating security testing directly into application development ensures that industry-specific requirements are consistently met without slowing down the innovation process.

StackHawk

Sample Customers

CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.