OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs StackHawk comparison

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 3 StackHawk reviews

694 Views
694 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and StackHawk are competing products in the realm of application security. Users generally prefer StackHawk due to its more comprehensive features and adaptability, despite OpenText offering competitive pricing and support.

Features: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing provides robust capabilities for identifying vulnerabilities, emphasizing large-scale enterprise needs. It offers deep enterprise-level security insights, which is invaluable for centralized security management. StackHawk's agile approach makes it developer-friendly, seamlessly integrating into CI/CD pipelines. It is adaptable for modern DevOps practices, enhancing speed and developer efficiency. Additionally, StackHawk accelerates the development process with an intuitive interface and real-time alerts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StackHawk provides a simple cloud-based deployment that integrates well with developer workflows, supported by strong customer service for quick issue resolution. OpenText's deployment is more complex, aimed at enterprises with sophisticated security infrastructures, potentially requiring extensive support during the initial setup.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText generally involves a higher setup cost, suited for enterprises needing extensive, centralized security solutions with a focus on long-term ROI. StackHawk is a cost-effective alternative, providing immediate value with minimal upfront investment, making it particularly attractive to smaller teams or startups focused on rapid development cycles. StackHawk's favorable ROI and lower cost often tilt the balance for scaling organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. StackHawk Report (Updated: September 2026).

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. StackHawk

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

DevSecOps (9th)

StackHawk

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 11.2%, up from 11.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StackHawk is 1.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing	11.2%
StackHawk	1.9%
Other	86.9%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

ArnabPaul

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Enhancements in manual testing align with reporting and integration features

WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produces minimal findings, necessitating manual verification. The solution offers customization features for crawling and vulnerability detection. It includes various security frameworks and allows selection of specific vulnerability types to audit, such as OWASP Top 10 or JavaScript-based vulnerabilities. When working with APIs, we can select OWASP API Top 10. The tool also supports custom audit features by combining different security frameworks. For on-premises deployment, the setup is complex, particularly regarding SQL server configuration. Unlike Burp Suite or OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, which have simpler setup processes, WebInspect requires SQL server setup to function.

Read full review

Aneesh Dalvi

Senior Software Engineer at Walmart

Shift-left security has transformed our DAST workflows and now improves early vulnerability detection

I believe a learning path should be added to help users maximize the potential of StackHawk. While the tool is powerful and intuitive, a structured learning path will provide step-by-step guidance on configuring scans, interpreting results, and implementing security best practices. StackHawk needs more reporting capabilities and more dashboard views to showcase the progress of vulnerabilities remediation. Additionally, some customization of scan policies will be neat, as the current way to apply policies for scans is very manual. StackHawk is a strong solution, but improved reporting, easier integration, and more AI-driven recommendations would make it even more effective. Overall, I am highly satisfied with its capabilities and continued improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."

"I'm sorry, but there is no review content provided to extract a quote from."

"The FPA and Audit Workbench are very helpful for me, and when we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities, with very detailed examples for each vulnerability, so it is very good for users and beginners and doesn't take a lot of time to understand the tool."

"I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level."

"Easy to scan and then share scan reports, it has definitely streamlined many processes."

"The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received."

"Guided Scan option allows us to easily scan and share reports."

"My experience with technical support has been good."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

"StackHawk has positively impacted my organization by giving us a new vision of how vulnerabilities were seen, as we now have more visibility in that matter."

"StackHawk has positively impacted my organization by introducing an automated process that did not exist previously, and it helped the company achieve PCI certification."

"StackHawk has helped us save time by automating security testing and identifying vulnerabilities earlier in the development cycle."

Cons

"We have had a problem with authentification."

"Fortify WebInspect could improve user-friendliness. Additionally, it is very bulky to use."

"The initial setup was complex."

"There are some file extensions, like .SER, that Fortify WebInspect doesn't scan."

"Lately, we've seen more false negatives."

"I want to enhance automation. Currently, Fortify WebInspect can scan and find vulnerabilities, but users with specific skills need to interpret the results and understand how to address them."

"The scanner could be better."

"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

"On a scale of one to ten, I would rate StackHawk an eight, only because I wish the product was a little less expensive."

"StackHawk needs more reporting capabilities and more dashboard views to showcase the progress of vulnerabilities remediation."

"StackHawk can be improved in the way that it is integrated, as at the very beginning, the idea was to, within the pipeline, mount the different resources that our microservices needed to start to run."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"This solution is very expensive."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"The price is okay."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?

I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...

What needs improvement with StackHawk?

What is your primary use case for StackHawk?

My main use case for StackHawk is for DAST, DAST, and API scans, providing early pen testing results. StackHawk helps our team become aware of issues earlier, leading to less tech debt and better s...

What advice do you have for others considering StackHawk?

My experience with StackHawk has been very credible, and I would rate them a five out of five. I chose five out of five for StackHawk for a couple of reasons: it enables me to set up any type of au...

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Comparisons

Compared 36% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 4% of the time

Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs StackHawk

Compared 44% of the time

Bright vs StackHawk

Compared 7% of the time

Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) vs StackHawk

Compared 5% of the time

More StackHawk Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

October 2026

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Download StackHawk product report

October 2026

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

No data available

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

StackHawk provides a dynamic application security testing tool designed to identify and fix vulnerabilities in modern CI/CD workflows quickly. It seamlessly integrates into developers' pipelines to deliver real-time feedback, helping teams prioritize and address application security efficiently.

Known for its developer-first approach, StackHawk empowers teams to conduct proactive security testing at every stage of the software development lifecycle. It offers robust scanning capabilities that automatically integrate into build pipelines, ensuring security checks are part of the development process from the outset. This makes it easier for developers to identify issues early, reducing the potential for vulnerabilities in production. StackHawk integrates with leading CI/CD and DevOps tools, facilitating smooth adoption into existing workflows.

What are the key features of StackHawk?

Seamless CI/CD Integration: Easily integrates with existing pipelines for efficient security checks.
Automated Scanning: Conducts automatic scans to highlight vulnerabilities in real-time.
DevOps Tool Compatibility: Aligns with popular DevOps tools to streamline processes.
Actionable Reporting: Provides comprehensive reports with clear remediation steps.
Developer-Centric Approach: Designed specifically for developers to ensure easy adoption.

What benefits should users look for in StackHawk reviews?

Time-Saving: Speeds up detection and fixing of security flaws in the development cycle.
Improved Security Posture: Enhances the application security presence with minimal effort.
Cost-Effective: Reduces the risks of expensive breaches by identifying vulnerabilities early.
Enhanced Collaboration: Encourages collaboration between security and development teams.

StackHawk is invaluable in industries such as finance and healthcare, where regulatory compliance and data security are paramount. Integrating security testing directly into application development ensures that industry-specific requirements are consistently met without slowing down the innovation process.

Sample Customers

Aaron's

Information Not Available