Continuous Dynamic and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing compete in application security testing. Continuous Dynamic seems more favorable in pricing and support, while OpenText Dynamic offers superior features despite its higher cost.
Features: Continuous Dynamic offers robust vulnerability assessments, real-time threat detection, and seamless integration with development workflows. OpenText Dynamic provides comprehensive coverage, detailed reporting, and advanced analytics for deeper security insights, addressing complex security requirements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Continuous Dynamic is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. OpenText offers a customizable deployment model that requires additional configuration but is supported by in-depth service for scalability.
Pricing and ROI: Continuous Dynamic is known for cost-effectiveness with an attractive pricing structure supporting strong ROI. OpenText has a higher setup cost but offers significant ROI by addressing extensive security challenges, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive solutions.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 11.6% |
| Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) | 4.3% |
| Other | 84.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Continuous Dynamic™ is a powerful dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution that rapidly and accurately finds vulnerabilities in websites and applications. With this DAST solution, you can perform scans and testing at the scale and speed modern enterprises need to identify security risks across your entire application portfolio.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
