Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) vs Veracode comparison

Black Duck and Veracode are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. Black Duck is ranked #12, while Veracode is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Black Duck holds a 4.4% mindshare in DAST, compared to Veracode’s 15.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Veracode users who would recommend it.

Continuous Dynamic (formerl...

Read 2 Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) reviews

1,191 Views
548 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Veracode

Read 207 Veracode reviews

23,090 Views
3,694 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Continuous Dynamic (formerl...

Veracode

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) and Veracode based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Continuous Dynamic (formerl...

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

207

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Container Security (10th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) is 4.4%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 15.7%, down from 27.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Veracode	15.7%
Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)	4.4%
Other	79.9%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

it_user245412

Executive Vice President, Operations at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples.

* The continuous online scanning capabilities and reporting features. * The SaaS product features accessible from a browser make managing our online systems easy. * The ability to review security items quickly along with being able to retest vulnerabilities on our schedule make the Sentinel product an invaluable tool for our company’s product security requirements.

Read full review

reviewer2703864

Head of Security Architecture at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Onboarding developers successfully while improving code security through IDE integration

Regarding room for improvement, we have some problems when onboarding new projects because the build process has to be done in a certain way, as Veracode analyzes the binaries and not the code by itself alone. If the process is not configured correctly, it doesn't work. That's one of the things that we are discussing with Veracode. Something positive that we've been able to do is submit formal feature requests to them, and they are working on them; they've already solved some of them. This encourages us to propose new ideas and improvements. Another improvement that we asked for this use case is to be able to configure how Veracode Fix proposes and fixes because sometimes it makes proposals using libraries that go against our architecture design made by the enterprise architecture team. For example, we want them to propose using another library, and that's something we already asked Veracode, and they are working on it. We want to specify when you see this kind of vulnerability, you can only propose these two options.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The SaaS product features accessible from a browser make managing our online systems easy."

"The most valuable feature of Veracode Static Analysis is the scanning."

"From a developer's perspective, Veracode's greenlight feature on the IDE is helpful. It helps the developer to be more proactive in secure coding standards. Apart from that, static analysis scanning is definitely one of the top features of Veracode."

"Veracode is easy to use even if you're not a security professional. I like the dynamic analysis feature, which offers a lot of cost savings when used in production."

"The analysis of the vulnerabilities and the results are the most valuable features."

"Using Veracode has helped to improve our organization in that we now have discipline in terms of periodically scanning our systems."

"I like Veracode's ease of integration with various cloud platforms and tools."

"It gives me an idea about the most important vulnerabilities and fast remediation tips."

"The dynamic scanning tool is what I like the best. Compared to other tools that I've used for dynamic scanning, it's much faster and easier to use."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"I would like to see more research and code examples for the vulnerabilities identified to better assist us with our remediation process."

"I've seen slightly better static analysis tools from other companies when it comes to speed and ease of use."

"The one thing I'd like to be able to do is schedule dynamic scans. Today we're kicking those off manually, but I believe that it's something have on their roadmap."

"Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis."

"They're advertising that they have a Go scanner, but it doesn't actually function."

"On-premise implementation is not available."

"Third-party library scanning would be very useful to have. When I was researching this a year ago, there was not a third-party library scan available. This would be a nice feature to have because we are now running through some assessments and finding out which tool can do it since this information needs to be captured. Since Veracode is a security solution, this should be related."

"The number of false positives could be reduced a lot. For each good result, we are getting somewhere around 15 to 20 false positives."

"One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"For enterprises, Veracode has done a fairly good job, but its pricing is not suitable for startups. The microservice distributed architecture for a startup is very small. I had to do a lot of discussions on the pricing initially. I previously worked in an enterprise organization where I used Veracode, and that's how I got to know about Veracode, but that was a big organization with more than a thousand employees. So, the cost is very different for them because the size of the application is different. Its pricing makes sense there, but when we try to onboard this solution for the startup ecosystem, pricing is not friendly. Because I knew the product and I knew its value, I onboarded it, but I don't think any other startup at our scale will onboard it."

"For our company, the price is reasonable for the benefits that we get."

"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works."

"The cost of scanning code is cheaper. It's typically $0.50 per line of code. However, it's expensive to run a high-level process that would normally require a human security expert. For example, penetration testing costs about $1,000 per application for penetration testing. The cost of these features may be too high for smaller organizations. On the other hand, Veracode's interactive application security testing is fast and cheaper compared to other software."

"Pricing-wise, I find it a bit expensive because it's based on the number of users requesting access to Veracode."

"The Veracode price model is based on application profiles, which is how you package your components for scanning."

"Licensing is pretty flexible. It's a little bit weird, it's by the size of the binary, which is a strange way to license a product. So far they've been pretty flexible about it."

"If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Healthcare Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	45
Large Enterprise	114

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

What do you like most about Veracode Static Analysis?

I like its integration with GitHub. I like using it from GitHub. I can use the GitHub URL and find out the vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 10% of the time

Fortify Application Defender vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 6% of the time

Polaris Platform vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 5% of the time

More Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) Competitors

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 6% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

May 2026

Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) report

Download Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) product report

Buyer's Guide

Veracode

April 2026

Download Veracode product report

Also Known As

Sentinel Dynamic, WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing, Synopsys WhiteHat Dynamic

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Continuous Dynamic^™ is a powerful dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution that rapidly and accurately finds vulnerabilities in websites and applications. With this DAST solution, you can perform scans and testing at the scale and speed modern enterprises need to identify security risks across your entire application portfolio.

Black Duck

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Veracode

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.