ReadyAPI Test vs SoapUI comparison

ReadyAPI Test and SoapUI are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. ReadyAPI Test is ranked #12, while SoapUI is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. ReadyAPI Test holds a 4.3% mindshare in APIT, compared to SoapUI’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ReadyAPI Test users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SoapUI users who would recommend it.

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

1,959 Views
1,156 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SoapUI

Read 3 SoapUI reviews

303 Views
303 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

SoapUI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

ReadyAPI Test and SoapUI are two prominent tools in the API testing landscape. SoapUI seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and ease of use.

Features: ReadyAPI Test is valued for advanced testing capabilities, seamless integrations, and robust support for various API protocols. SoapUI is known for ease of use, scripting flexibility, and an extensive plugin library.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test can improve in performance and usability, especially with large datasets. SoapUI needs better documentation and quicker customer support responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test has straightforward deployment but mixed reviews on initial setup complexity; customer service is well-regarded. SoapUI's deployment is simpler and more favored, but its customer service, particularly support documentation, needs improvement.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test users feel pricing is justified with good ROI. SoapUI's free version is a major draw, and the paid tiers offer strong value.

To learn more, read our detailed ReadyAPI Test vs. SoapUI Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. SoapUI

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in API Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (25th), Regression Testing Tools (14th)

SoapUI

Ranking in API Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 4.3%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SoapUI is 1.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SoapUI	1.8%
ReadyAPI Test	4.3%
Other	93.9%

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Used for API testing and provides Groovy plugin

We use the solution mainly for API testing The solution's most valuable features are the designing of API, Property Transfer feature, and Groovy plugin. The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email. Sometimes, Groovy can be a tricky language, and we need to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on."

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."

"It's a very simple solution to use."

"It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"SoapUI Pro is a good tool when it comes to API design and orchestration. Additionally, it is beneficial for functional and for performance testing."

"API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features."

"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."

Cons

"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."

"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

"The current interface is unsatisfactory."

"Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."

"The UI could be a bit more flexible."

"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."

"There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"It is free of charge."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"The cost is not that bad."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

"SoapUI is a cheap tool that does not have an expensive license."

"SoapUI is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SoapUI?

We need to test the APIs as we build them. I use the product for API testing. You can do AWS security in SoapUI. With SoapUI, we can even perform mutual SSL authentication by incorporating certific...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI?

The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email. Sometimes, Groovy can be a tricky language, and we need to focus more on that.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SoapUI?

We use the solution mainly for API testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 20% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 10% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 3% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

January 2026

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Buyer's Guide

API Testing Tools

January 2026

Download SoapUI product report

Also Known As

SoapUI NG Pro

No data available

Overview

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

SmartBear

SoapUI is a leading tool for testing SOAP and REST web services, known for its robust functionality and user-friendly interface. It supports functional, automated, and load testing, and offers powerful scripting and automation. Organizations appreciate its efficiency, protocol flexibility, and integration capabilities.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. SoapUI

December 2025

Free Report: ReadyAPI Test vs. SoapUI

Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI Test vs. SoapUI and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ReadyAPI Test vs. SoapUI report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.