SoapUI is a leading tool for testing SOAP and REST web services, known for its robust functionality and user-friendly interface. It supports functional, automated, and load testing, and offers powerful scripting and automation. Organizations appreciate its efficiency, protocol flexibility, and integration capabilities.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SoapUI | 0.6% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 27.7% |
| Katalon Studio | 12.6% |
| Other | 59.1% |
SoapUI users frequently highlight its robust testing capabilities as one of its standout features, noting the ability to conduct comprehensive API testing with ease. The user-friendly interface also garners appreciation, as it simplifies the process of creating, running, and analyzing tests. Additionally, SoapUI's support for various protocols such as SOAP, REST, and JMS is often mentioned as a key benefit, ensuring flexibility and wide applicability. Finally, the tool's powerful scripting and automation functions are consistently praised, enabling users to enhance their testing efficiency and effectiveness.
SoapUI could benefit from enhancements in several areas. Users frequently mention that the user interface feels outdated and can be unintuitive, making navigation and use less streamlined than desired. Performance issues are another common concern, particularly when handling larger projects or more complex testing scenarios, as it tends to slow down or become unresponsive. Additionally, documentation and customer support are areas that could use significant improvement, as better guidance and timely assistance would enhance the user experience. Finally, there is a need for more advanced reporting features, as current options may not offer the depth of insights or customization that some users require for thorough analysis and presentation.
Users report that the return on investment (ROI) from implementing SoapUI is generally positive. They highlight significant time savings in testing processes, which leads to decreased costs and faster project completion. Many have experienced improved efficiency and productivity in their testing workflows. Enhanced automation capabilities are frequently mentioned as a key benefit, allowing teams to focus on other critical tasks. Overall, SoapUI contributes to optimized resource usage and better project outcomes, translating into financial and operational gains for organizations.
Users have reported that SoapUI offers a variety of pricing options, including both free and paid versions, which makes it adaptable for different budgets. The initial setup is generally straightforward, though some users mentioned complexities when integrating with larger systems or additional plugins. Licensing is seen as flexible, with users appreciating that the free version provides substantial functionality, while the paid version offers more advanced features. Some users expressed that the cost for the advanced version is reasonable given the extensive capabilities it adds.
SoapUI is frequently used for testing SOAP and REST web services. It excels in functional testing, where users can validate the operations and responses of their web services. Another key use case is automated testing, allowing for scheduled test runs and integration with continuous integration systems. Load testing is also a significant application, as SoapUI can simulate heavy traffic and analyze the system's performance under stress. Lastly, it assists teams with mock services to create simulations for services not yet implemented, enabling parallel development processes.
Based on user feedback, SoapUI's customer service and support have received mixed reactions. Some users find the support team to be helpful and responsive, addressing issues promptly and effectively. However, others have experienced delays and found the support lacking in depth and knowledge. Overall, the quality of assistance can vary, with some customers praising the experience while others suggest there is room for improvement.
Users find the deployment of SoapUI to be relatively quick and straightforward, whereas others suggest that alternative tech solutions tend to require more time and effort for setup and implementation phases, highlighting a contrast in ease and speed between the products.
Many users find SoapUI's scalability to be limited for large-scale projects. While it's effective for smaller tasks and initial testing phases, performance issues often arise when dealing with more extensive and complex testing scenarios. Some users report that as the volume of tests and data increases, the tool can become slow and less reliable. Additionally, there are mentions of SoapUI requiring more robust management and maintenance efforts for larger implementations.
Users have generally positive feedback about the stability of SoapUI. They mention that the software is reliable for their testing needs and performs consistently well. It effectively handles various testing scenarios without frequent crashes or errors. Occasionally, there are references to minor bugs or issues, but these do not seem to significantly impact the overall dependability of the solution.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Test Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I primarily use SoapUI for API testing, and its valuable features include API design, Property Transfer, and the Groovy plugin. It saves time and money, simplifies automation, and offers cohesive reporting compared to tools like Postman. |
| Senior associate at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I use SoapUI primarily for API testing, and its ability to handle AWS security and mutual SSL authentication is valuable. However, it would benefit from a Chrome browser extension. Unlike Postman, SoapUI supports uploading visual files. |
| Application performance tester at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I use SoapUI for API testing due to its simplicity and intuitive interface, showing payloads and responses clearly. Although straightforward, it lacks advanced features compared to tools like Postman, which I find more robust for API testing needs. |
