RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"The most valuable feature I enjoy that is provided by this security analytics platform is the ability to measure resilience."

"The Vulnerability and Risk Management feature is valuable to us for keeping the security posture up-to-date and conducting regular continuous audits."

"The most valuable feature of the product to me is being able to ask what-if questions about traffic flows, which is a great ability to have for security and incident response."

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"If you want to understand your network environment as it relates to configuration issues, host/node vulnerabilities and firewall configurations, then I highly recommend that RedSeal be considered."

"Once you start using it, you will see the potential."

"SecureChange makes our lives easier with automation."

"The solution helps us ensure that security policy is followed across our entire hybrid network."

"Tufin's given us the ability to correlate between policy and firewall rules."

"Implementing this solution has made everything faster."

"Any company that puts in SecureTrack alone will see a very quick return on investment."

"One of the biggest quick wins that we had with Tufin was cleaning up our firewall policies and rules. We cleaned out a lot of rules which helped our devices, longevity-wise, as well as speed-wise."

"The biggest thing is regarding the automation that it allows our customers to do at the end of the day so that they can go and scale their environment a lot more than they could in the past."

"Integration with other security tools. Have the ability to create custom reports: Currently, within RedSeal you only have the option to run the canned reports."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"Initially their level one support was very frustrating to work with."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"There is room for improvement regarding customization and automation of reports."

"Although we are talking about a very robust platform, I would like to see the Windows compatible VM version come back."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"We do have an ongoing issue with capacity. If one of our resources is working on it, nobody else can do anything."

"We were just talking to them about usage for the F5 platform. They will not be going after specific environments, but a more OpenAPI. They will have other companies write it, etc. It's a little different than I had expected."

"It would be great to add a link to Visio to create shapes directly from Tufin, as it has the configuration."

"I would rate their reports as a four out of ten. I don't like the way that they are shown. It is too hard to export and send them to our clients."

"The change impact analysis doesn't even get close to actually solving our problems. I am not impressed with it."

"We want to have the ability for a ticket requester to add somebody, or to give somebody view rights to their ticket."

"SecureChange has been a bit of a challenge."

"I haven't fully utilized Tufin yet and I'm working toward that area."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"For us it's around $40,000 or so."

"I'm saving 20 man-hours a week, so I am seeing some ROI."

"Our licensing fees are more than $100,000 USD per year."

"We have seen ROI from the side of operations, and we'll probably get to more of that as time goes on. However it took a while to get to that point."

"Because we're quite a large company, the price wasn't too much of a factor for us."

"There is no issue with the pricing because we used a VM. That kept the cost low, as compared to an appliance."

"Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for the customer for three to five years. We make the general total cost of ownership at the beginning of a project for our customers."

"We've seen a decrease of about 50 percent in the overall time it takes to complete a firewall change."