ReversingLabs vs SonarQube comparison

ReversingLabs and SonarSource Sàrl are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. ReversingLabs is ranked #43, while SonarSource Sàrl is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. ReversingLabs holds a 0.6% mindshare in AS, compared to SonarSource Sàrl’s 16.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ReversingLabs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of SonarSource Sàrl users who would recommend it.

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

2,275 Views
523 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube

Read 134 SonarQube reviews

38,374 Views
26,862 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

SonarQube

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

SonarQube and ReversingLabs are two competing products in the software security and source code analysis category. ReversingLabs seems to have the upper hand due to its feature richness and comprehensive security scope, despite having a potentially higher price point.

Features: SonarQube integrates well with development environments and supports multiple programming languages, aiding continuous code inspection. It emphasizes code quality, helping identify code smells and maintaining coding standards. ReversingLabs focuses on advanced threat intelligence, providing comprehensive file analysis and a broader security approach, including static analysis capabilities and a vast malware repository.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube could improve by enhancing its security vulnerability detection and offering more robust penetration testing features. Additionally, further expansion in languages supported in the free version could prove beneficial. ReversingLabs may need to focus on simplifying its deployment process, reducing the complexity of its framework, and improving integration with third-party development tools to make it more developer-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube is praised for its ease of deployment within development pipelines, offering straightforward setup and good support resources. On the other hand, ReversingLabs requires a more elaborate setup suited for extensive threat analysis, with comprehensive support to address the deployment complexity.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube provides a competitive pricing model advantageous to smaller enterprises keen on managing costs for code quality solutions. Conversely, ReversingLabs, despite a higher initial investment, offers substantial ROI with its expansive security insights, appealing to organizations focused on comprehensive security strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed ReversingLabs vs. SonarQube Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs vs. SonarQube

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,961 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

43rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (45th), Container Security (46th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (25th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (30th), Software Supply Chain Security (19th)

SonarQube

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

134

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube is 16.9%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube	16.9%
ReversingLabs	0.6%
Other	82.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Tim Craig

Forensic Lead, Global Security Fusion Center at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Very good malware and goodware repository and enables us to look more deeply at indicators of compromise

The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild. Also, the solution’s object and file analysis provide us with actionable insights. Its malware and goodware repository is very good. It's very robust. It gets all of the different repositories that are out there that do analysis and brings them under one roof where we can statically analyze for those indicators of compromise and look at them more deeply. If we need to go deeper into things, we can do that.

Read full review

KarthikHarpanhalli

Sr Software Engineering Supervisor at Mozarc Medical

Gains control over rule customization and achieves reliable vulnerability assessment

The deployment process took me about 2 or 3 hours to deploy SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), although I do not remember exactly since it was done about 2 years back. Currently, about 10 of my developers are using SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in my company. I do not have plans to increase the usage of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in the future as there will not be any requirement to increase. I am a senior software engineer and supervisor at Mozark Medical. My corporate email address is karthik.k.a.r.t.h.i.k.h.a.r.p.a.n.h.a.l.l.i@mozarkmedical.com. Overall, I would rate SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"When we push our code to the repo, while in continuous integration, it will run a few tests and based on the vulnerability data set it has, it can track the vulnerabilities, indicate the code line where the issue exists, and show how much code is covered by all the unit tests, integration tests, and those sorts of things."

"It is very good at identifying technical debt."

"It is a very good tool for analysis despite its limitations."

"The most valuable feature of SonarQube I have found to be the configuration that has allowed us to can make adjusts to the demands of the code review. It gives a specified classification regarding the skill, prioritization, and it is easy for me to review and make my code."

"I like that it helps us maintain our work quality and code security."

"SonarQube is useful for controlling all of our Azure task tracking and scanning."

"Code Convention: Using the tool to implement some sort of coding convention is really useful and ensures that the code is consistent no matter how many contributors."

"I find SonarQube Cloud very easy to use and simple to integrate initially."

More SonarQube pros

Cons

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"Our developers have complained about the Quality Gates and the number of false positives that this product reports."

"It does not provide deeper scanning of vulnerabilities in an application, on a live session. This is something we are not happy about. Maybe the reason for that is we are running the community edition currently, but other editions may improve on that aspect."

"I am not very pleased with the technical debt computation."

"The solution is a bit lacking on the security side, in terms of finding and identifying vulnerabilities."

"The tool needs to be more compatible with C/C++ language"

"We had some issues scanning the master branch but when we upgraded to version 7.9 we noticed it does scan the master branch but we had to do a workaround for it to happen. This process could be improved in a future release."

"We previously experienced issues with security but a segregated security violation has been implemented and the issues we experienced are being fixed."

"SonarQube could improve by adding automatic creation of tasks after scanning and more support for the Czech language."

More SonarQube cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"Compared to similar solutions, SonarQube was more accessible to us and had more benefits, with regards to size of the code base and supported languages. Apart from the Enterprise licensing fee, there are no additional costs."

"I think comparing the product to competitors it should be less expensive."

"This solution is free."

"The beauty of this solution is the free open-source version is capable enough in doing pretty much what an enterprise-level version can do."

"We are using the free, unlicensed version."

"We are using the open-source community version, but there are enterprise licenses available."

"The price of this solution is more expensive than competitors. However, it works better than competitors."

"SonarQube price is a little bit higher than Kiuwan's. Kiuwan also gives a little bit of flexibility in terms of pricing."

More SonarQube pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	79

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 10% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

MetaDefender vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs

Compared 6% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 5% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube

Compared 29% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube

Compared 5% of the time

Semgrep vs SonarQube

Compared 4% of the time

More SonarQube Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

February 2026

Download ReversingLabs product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube

January 2026

Download SonarQube product report

Also Known As

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Sonar, SonarQube Cloud

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

ReversingLabs

SonarSource Sàrl

Overview

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs

SonarQube leads automated code review, enhancing code quality and security in AI-driven SDLCs. It analyzes pull requests, providing developers with actionable feedback and AI-driven fixes before code merges. Trusted by top enterprises, it supports SaaS and self-managed deployments.

SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools like Jenkins. It is renowned for its static code analysis, code coverage, and security vulnerability detection. While its open-source foundation and scalability are praised, users seek enhanced integration across multiple languages, better security features, and improved documentation. Despite challenges, its ability to automate code inspections and ensure compliance with coding standards makes it essential in software development processes, facilitating continuous improvement.

What are the most important features?

Language Support: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
Custom Coding Rules: Allows defining project-specific rules.
Integration: Seamlessly works with Jenkins and CI/CD pipelines.
Quality Gates: Simplifies monitoring code quality.
Dashboards: Facilitates easy monitoring and management.
Static Code Analysis: Detects issues early in development.
Security Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities automatically.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved Code Quality: Enhances reliability and maintainability.
Security Assurance: Strengthens code against vulnerabilities.
Technical Debt Reduction: Ensures cleaner, maintainable code.
Efficient Feedback: Speeds up development cycles.
Standards Compliance: Aids in adhering to best practices.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and automotive, SonarQube is leveraged for static code analysis, automating code inspections, and ensuring compliance with stringent standards. Teams integrate it into their CI/CD pipelines to maintain high-quality code, identify security vulnerabilities, and enhance code maintainability.

SonarSource Sàrl

Sample Customers

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Snowflake, Booking.com, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca, and Ford Motor Company.

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs vs. SonarQube

February 2026

Free Report: ReversingLabs vs. SonarQube

Find out what your peers are saying about ReversingLabs vs. SonarQube and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ReversingLabs vs. SonarQube report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.