No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SafeBreach vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SafeBreach
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (8th)
Trellix Network Detection a...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (6th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

SafeBreach and Trellix Network Detection and Response aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SafeBreach is designed for Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) and holds a mindshare of 7.9%, up 7.1% compared to last year.
Trellix Network Detection and Response, on the other hand, focuses on Advanced Threat Protection (ATP), holds 4.0% mindshare, down 4.1% since last year.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SafeBreach7.9%
Pentera18.2%
Cymulate14.9%
Other59.0%
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Trellix Network Detection and Response4.0%
Palo Alto Networks WildFire6.7%
Microsoft Defender for Office 3656.1%
Other83.2%
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

Dmytro Petrashchuk - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at IT Specialist LLC
Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data
The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods. It can run different attacks in a safe manner without damaging anything inside the infrastructure. The great thing is that the database is constantly updating. It has signature attack playbooks to check if a company is protected against a potential attack.
Twinkle Solanki - PeerSpot reviewer
Business development executive at Digitaltrack solution Pvt Ltd
Continuous network insight has improved early threat detection and streamlined investigations
Overall, we have a positive experience with Trellix Network Detection and Response, but like any enterprise security solution, there are areas where it can continue to improve. One area would be user interface and dashboard customization. While the platform provides a lot of valuable information, new users can sometimes face a learning curve when navigating and investigating and creating customized views. More intuitive dashboards would simplify workflows and help analysts access critical information even faster. Another area for improvement is reporting and analytics. The existing reporting capabilities are useful, but more flexibility and customizable reporting options would make it easier to generate executive-level summaries, compliance reports, and operational metrics for different audiences.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."
"People who would like to understand if their security program really works need a solution like SafeBreach."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."
"The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security."
"It's a very simple solution and a very effective product in my network."
"Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization by creating a better safeguard and protecting us from threats."
"The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money."
"By every measure, the FireEye Network Threat Prevention Platform has exceeded our expectations."
"The installation phase was easy."
"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic, as we can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us, giving us a better view of our network and our email environment."
"The product is very easy to configure."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."
"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."
"Cluster option is not available in NX, and for false positives we need some customization configuration available, such as a whitelist."
"If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."
"Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation."
"A lot of false positives."
"Technical support needs improvement as sometimes engineers are not available promptly, especially during high-severity incidents."
"It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto."
"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right."
"FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price starts from about $140,000 so this solution is expensive in my opinion. Maintenance and support is included in the license cost."
"The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today."
"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."
"The pricing is a little high."
"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
"The tool is a bit pricey."
"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is positive, as the setup process was straightforward, licensing was flexible, and the value deliver...
What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
Based on my experience with the solution, I do not see any improvements needed for Trellix Network Detection and Response at present; it might be required in the future, but there is no space to im...
What is your primary use case for FireEye Network Security?
Our main use case for Trellix Network Detection and Response is to maintain oversight of our network traffic and catch any threats or unusual activity as early as possible. Trellix Network Detectio...
 

Also Known As

No data available
FireEye Network Security, FireEye
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Regeneron, Deloitte, Experian, Pepsi, SAP, UKG
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Horizon3.ai, Pentera, Cymulate and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: September 2026.
914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.