Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sangfor Endpoint Secure	0.7%
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	1.2%
Other	98.1%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Shiraz Ali

Networking Solutions Specialist at GBM

Provides a unified and multi-layer security solution

I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities. Having a single, more user-friendly management console, like a one-window approach, would streamline the user experience and make it easier for administrators to handle security tasks more efficiently. Sangfor Endpoint Secure currently only allows one manager to control clients, and it lacks a backup system. It would be better if it supported a secondary manager for backup in case the primary one fails, ensuring uninterrupted service.

Read full review

CESARCASTRO

Committee of IT Cybersececurity at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees

Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses

This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"We use the product for network protection from any malicious threat."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"What we're using the most and what we found valuable in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response are Web Control, Advanced Threat Protection, and Threat Prevention features."

"The most valuable feature I found in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the guided analytics or guided EDR investigation."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the solution's technical support team a nine and a half or ten out of ten."

"Trellix has done a good job reducing threats."

"Trellix has a user-friendly interface."

"When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination."

"The product provides a one-click recovery of encrypted files."

"This is a stable product."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"Sometimes, the VPN is not secure and doesn't work properly in Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"It is complicated to establish a tunnel due to technical issues in the VPN system."

"Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities."

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

"The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."

"The dashboard and reporting features are not so user-friendly or intuitive, so they need some work."

"I'd like the tool to become more like an XDR, with one management system and endpoint activation."

"An area for improvement in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the historical search. For example: when you have information on the artifact and a precedent, you want to do a search, and that is a bit lacking in the tool."

"Trellix does not support Linux and Mac."

"Trellix needs to focus on gaining traction with partners and building trust among users."

"The dashboard is split across different platforms. For example, if you want information on Incident Detection, you have to access one dashboard, and for DLP reporting, there's a separate platform. This fragmentation means you can't access everything from a single dashboard."

"One of the issues about the product stems from the failure to work on its administrative scalability. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."

"The pricing is always high."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"The price is reasonable."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 10% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 4% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 42% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 18% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 9% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sutherland Global Services

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)