SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

SAP and Workiva are both solutions in the GRC category. SAP is ranked #12 with an average rating of 6.7, while Workiva is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. SAP holds a 1.5% mindshare in G, compared to Workiva’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Read 7 SAP BusinessObjects GRC reviews

721 Views
555 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

2,348 Views
1,409 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

SAP BusinessObjects GRC and Workiva Wdesk are competing products in enterprise governance, risk management, and compliance solutions. SAP BusinessObjects GRC has an advantage in integration capabilities with SAP systems, while Workiva Wdesk is preferred for its user-friendly design and efficient workflow features.

Features: SAP BusinessObjects GRC offers risk management, access control, and real-time monitoring. Workiva Wdesk includes seamless reporting, document management, and exceptional collaboration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP BusinessObjects GRC involves complex deployment within SAP landscapes, whereas Workiva Wdesk simplifies setup with its cloud-based model. Workiva provides proactive customer service, while SAP support is traditional and structured.

Pricing and ROI: SAP BusinessObjects GRC incurs higher upfront costs due to configuration and integration needs, benefitting long-term ROI in SAP environments. Workiva Wdesk offers scalable pricing and a quicker ROI thanks to ease of use and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs. Workiva Wdesk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Ranking in GRC

12th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Controls Monitoring (2nd)

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in GRC

8th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Performance Management (11th), Financial Close Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the GRC category, the mindshare of SAP BusinessObjects GRC is 1.5%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 3.3%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Workiva Wdesk	3.3%
SAP BusinessObjects GRC	1.5%
Other	95.2%

GRC

Featured Reviews

Vishal Guthula

Sr Advanced Analytics Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Experienced security and easy understanding with advanced customization enhances efficiency

Regarding automation, they could enhance features for checking real-time data when someone attempts to access data without proper permissions. Currently, we do not receive immediate alerts; we only discover issues after something goes wrong. Having prevention alerts immediately when someone triggers unauthorized actions would allow us to address these situations proactively.

Read full review

reviewer2510292

Corporate ESG Analyst at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has cross-functional connectivity but improvement is needed in script encoding

The tool's deployment is quick. Once the program is set up, you're ready to collect data and connect it to your report. The deployment team's size depends on the size of the company and how many different data providers you're utilizing. Some companies have one person doing everything, while others have a huge team. We're on the latter end of it, with many people involved. One great thing about the platform is that everything is consolidated in one place, providing a single resource for everyone. This is a benefit. The maintenance of the solution depends on the experience of the person managing the company's program. The company might have a contractor handling the back end and software management if they're low-level and only analyzing the data. However, if you have someone experienced with software and script encoding, that person might be the analyst and managing the program. Generally, most people are just analysts and not managing the software. There's an opportunity for improvement in user management of their software, and I hope they address this gap before the year ends.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Initial setup was straightforward. It took maybe one week."

"The customization options in the dashboards inside SAP BusinessObjects GRC are highly valuable, and the real-time monitoring feature performs effectively, allowing teams to maintain data security by restricting domain visibility."

"The tool helps create reports for projects, including the creation of any ad-hoc reports"

"It is wonderful from the control perspective. The GRC tools help you in knowing what are the risk controls, how to mitigate risks, and how to ensure that there are no conflicts between the roles. From the user perspective, you get to know what are the permission risks and access risks. You get a lot of useful information."

"The best features are the scalability and flexibility to implement applications on top of the BW."

"We have enterprise clients for the product."

"The stability of SAP BusinessObjects GRC is acceptable."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

Cons

"We cannot actively log in to the system. It should also improve support."

"I am working on features that are not functioning as expected, which creates significant difficulties in management."

"Technical support could be better and faster."

"Currently, we do not receive immediate alerts; we only discover issues after something goes wrong."

"An additional feature I would like to see is the option to add wait time and integrate sources in wait time."

"I think the old system is better than the new one. From an improvement perspective, the tool needs to ensure that the new technologies it offers are better than the old ones."

"BusinessObjects is very dated. It is not that user-friendly. It should be made more user-friendly. In addition, if they could make predictive analytics an embedded part of it where people get to know what is there to offer, it would be great."

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

"The speed must be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SAP BusinessObjects GRC is expensive."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. I would rate their pricing 4 out of 5."

"The product's licensing costs involve a one-time purchase. The tool also allows others to make annual payments towards the licensing charges of the product."

"The license is costly."

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

The tool helps create reports for projects, including the creation of any ad-hoc reports

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

I work with SAP, and currently I am working with other domains such as Power BI, Microsoft, and in the AI sector. When working with Microsoft, I utilize solutions such as Intune, Configuration Mana...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workiva Wdesk?

I've been working with the tool's script encoding departments and top management to address gaps in their script encoding. They are working towards closing these gaps to ensure we can continue usin...

See all answers

Comparisons

ACL Analytics vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 28% of the time

Security Weaver vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 14% of the time

RSA Archer vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 14% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 13% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 8% of the time

More SAP BusinessObjects GRC Competitors

AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 13% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 5% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 5% of the time

OneStream XF vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

January 2026

Download SAP BusinessObjects GRC product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

January 2026

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

BusinessObjects GRC

Wdesk

Overview

SAP GRC helps you automatically detect, remediate, and prevent access risk violations - no matter the industry or business size. Get real-time visibility into your current risk position, and confidently reduce unauthorized access, fraud, and the cost of compliance.

SAP

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

Optimize your structured and composite reports
Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
Transform processes to enable insight

Workiva

Sample Customers

INEOS Melamines GmbH, Banco Galicia

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs. Workiva Wdesk

December 2025

Free Report: SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.