No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SonarQube vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] comparison

SonarSource Sàrl and LevelBlue are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Additionally, 84% of SonarSource Sàrl users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of LevelBlue users who would recommend it.
SonarQube
Read 135 SonarQube reviews
  • 40,412 Views
  • 27,480 Comparison Views
84% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2025

Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] and SonarQube compete in the application security domain. SonarQube holds an advantage due to its comprehensive features, making it a strong choice for those seeking greater value.

Features: Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] emphasizes robust vulnerability detection and ease of use for routine scanning tasks. SonarQube offers extensive integration options, detailed code quality analysis, and supports over 20 programming languages, with a strong focus on software quality assurance and continuous integration.

Room for Improvement: Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] could improve by expanding its integration capabilities, reducing false positives, and ensuring long-term support for its end-of-life product. SonarQube can enhance by improving the documentation for integrations, lowering the initial setup complexity, and addressing support for mono reports in larger organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is simpler to deploy, but its end-of-life status affects long-term support. SonarQube offers flexible deployment options, including on-premise and cloud-based, with reliable customer service and active community support ensuring ongoing assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] may have lower initial setup costs, appealing for shorter-term projects. SonarQube, despite a higher initial investment, offers a significant return on investment through its scalable platform and enhanced productivity, appealing for long-term security and quality management initiatives.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
135
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (1st), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)
Trustwave App Scanner [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Sathyamurthi Natarajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Sathyamurthi Natarajan
IT Officer (Solution Architect) at World Bank
We maintain high code standards with effective static code analysis and integration
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) could be improved on the reporting front. Instead of grouping, I would prefer to scan the code as part of development and then generate a report on a daily basis among different units or projects, which is currently complicated. We need to change it to more of a portfolio report, where configuring or setting up things on the portfolio requires tagging at the ADO level.
Read full review
Securityd276 - PeerSpot reviewer
Securityd276
Security Manager at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Stable solution that has increased the maturity of our security program
I would like to see a little more flexibility with regards to setting up profiles for vulnerabilities. For the most part, it fits our needs but a little more flexibility would be great. I would also like to have more information on AI. If we start to deploy AI in our infrastructure, does it cover that as well?
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"When it comes to security, this solution is pretty great."
"We use it as a gatekeeper for our external developers to follow the rules; if they don't comply with the rules within the source code, they cannot commit."
"Code Convention: Using the tool to implement some sort of coding convention is really useful and ensures that the code is consistent no matter how many contributors."
"It is a very good tool for analysis despite its limitations."
"I like that it helps us maintain our work quality and code security."
"It has very good scalability and stability."
"SonarQube is designed well making it easy to use, simple to identify issues and find solutions to problems."
"It easily outperforms other static code tools — It's perfect as a static code analysis tool."
More SonarQube pros
"The simple fact that it puts us in a better place for identifying our vulnerabilities is a form of ROI."
"Trustwave App Scanner makes it really easy and convenient for us to notify the website owners before the scans, as well as providing the scan results."
"This scanner was more efficient compared to its competitors."
"Go ahead and use Hailstorm as it's the best dynamic code analysis tool one can invest in and it gives a better ROI than most."
"Web application security testing is a valuable feature."
"The stability is great. We haven't had any issues at all with it."
 

Cons

"Price is high and only worth it if your organization has hundreds of developers."
"The reports could improve by providing more information. We are not able to use the reports in our operation until they are improved. Additionally, if the vendor provided more customization capabilities it would be a benefit."
"The solution could improve by providing more advanced technologies."
"I think SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) should improve by integrating a new feature that includes AI. As soon as I see that they've got a new feature that integrates AI that is not as generative as other GenAI platforms that actually generate the code and help developers develop faster, I believe that capability is lacking."
"We had some issues with the scanner."
"From a reporting perspective, we sometimes have problems interpreting the vulnerability scan reports. For example, if it finds a possible threat, our analysts have to manually check the provided reports, and sometimes we have issues getting all the data needed to properly verify if it's accurate or not."
"However, time and time again, some issues become annoying, since they are actually not issues."
"SonarQube could be improved with more dynamic testing—basically, now, it's a static code analysis scan."
More SonarQube cons
"It doesn't support modern web technologies such as GWT, Angular, JS etc."
"One feature that I would really want is the number of total applications in the web GUI; after selecting a filter on the applications, it would be really helpful if it shows the number of applications."
"It was complex as I have to make sure all the requirements are in place before on-boarding Hailstorm."
"I would like to see a little more flexibility with regards to setting up profiles for vulnerabilities."
"Used to crash/freeze due to poor performance, not sure about newer versions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay €10 per month for this solution, which is good. It provides a good value for money."
"This solution is free."
"The tool's pricing is reasonable."
"I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this."
"The solution has a free version and a license version. The license is priced reasonably, the cost of hiring one programmer is more expensive than the solution."
"There is both a free and licensed version. The free version has limitations on development languages and support."
"Previously, the pricing was 17,000 euros for five million lines analyzed. However, they now charge $15,000 per one million lines, significantly increasing the cost."
"There are many different packages with different pricing options available. We are able to try what we have and if we need extra features we can upgrade the license."
More SonarQube pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise79
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
See all answers
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
See all answers
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Logo
Checkmarx One vs SonarQube
Compared 25% of the time
Snyk vs SonarQube Logo
Snyk vs SonarQube
Compared 7% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs SonarQube Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs SonarQube
Compared 5% of the time
Veracode vs SonarQube Logo
Veracode vs SonarQube
Compared 3% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube
Compared 3% of the time
More SonarQube Competitors
HCL AppScan vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Logo
HCL AppScan vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL]
Compared 41% of the time
Snyk vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Logo
Snyk vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL]
Compared 23% of the time
Sonatype Lifecycle vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL]
Compared 11% of the time
Veracode vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Logo
Veracode vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
SonarQube
May 2026
SonarQube reportDownload SonarQube product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
June 2026
Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] reportDownload Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Sonar, SonarQube Cloud
Hailstorm, Cenzic Hailstorm
 

Interactive Demo

SonarSource Sàrl
Demo not available
LevelBlue
 

Overview

SonarQube leads automated code review, enhancing code quality and security in AI-driven SDLCs. It analyzes pull requests, providing developers with actionable feedback and AI-driven fixes before code merges. Trusted by top enterprises, it supports SaaS and self-managed deployments.

SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools like Jenkins. It is renowned for its static code analysis, code coverage, and security vulnerability detection. While its open-source foundation and scalability are praised, users seek enhanced integration across multiple languages, better security features, and improved documentation. Despite challenges, its ability to automate code inspections and ensure compliance with coding standards makes it essential in software development processes, facilitating continuous improvement.

What are the most important features?
  • Language Support: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
  • Custom Coding Rules: Allows defining project-specific rules.
  • Integration: Seamlessly works with Jenkins and CI/CD pipelines.
  • Quality Gates: Simplifies monitoring code quality.
  • Dashboards: Facilitates easy monitoring and management.
  • Static Code Analysis: Detects issues early in development.
  • Security Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities automatically.
What benefits should users look for?
  • Improved Code Quality: Enhances reliability and maintainability.
  • Security Assurance: Strengthens code against vulnerabilities.
  • Technical Debt Reduction: Ensures cleaner, maintainable code.
  • Efficient Feedback: Speeds up development cycles.
  • Standards Compliance: Aids in adhering to best practices.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and automotive, SonarQube is leveraged for static code analysis, automating code inspections, and ensuring compliance with stringent standards. Teams integrate it into their CI/CD pipelines to maintain high-quality code, identify security vulnerabilities, and enhance code maintainability.

SonarSource Sàrl
Provides ability to test applications for security vulnerabilities, security policies and regulatory compliance.
LevelBlue
 

Sample Customers

Snowflake, Booking.com, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca, and Ford Motor Company.
Leading Health Insurer
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
June 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.