Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Sophos Central vs VyOS Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Sophos Central
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (8th)
VyOS Platform
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Routers (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Sophos Central and VyOS Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Sophos Central is designed for AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms and holds a mindshare of 0.0%.
VyOS Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Routers, holds 0.2% mindshare.
AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Sophos Central0.0%
CrowdStrike Falcon19.3%
Darktrace18.8%
Other61.9%
AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms
Routers Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
VyOS Platform0.2%
MikroTik Routers and Switches23.4%
Cisco Enterprise Routers18.9%
Other57.5%
Routers
 

Featured Reviews

Sandeepraj Gatla - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost-effective security management with a user-friendly interface, efficient resource utilization, and rapid response capabilities
While Sophos Central has demonstrated commendable functionality, there is room for improvement in the realm of automation. Specifically, addressing ransomware attacks often requires leveraging external tools, deploying virtual machines, and utilizing supplementary tools like Caliper Analytics for operations and security communication. The integration of these essential functionalities directly into the software would represent a significant enhancement, streamlining the incident response process and bolstering the platform's comprehensive threat mitigation capabilities. Furthermore, a valuable addition to future releases could involve augmenting the new screen component with advanced capabilities such as XML utilization and rule integration. This enhancement, especially pertinent to tools involved in sandboxing and virtual machines within the investigation process, would greatly streamline the analysis of logs and reports. This would prove particularly beneficial in the context of email analysis, spam attack detection, and other critical security aspects. By incorporating these features, Sophos Central could further elevate its utility in facilitating in-depth security analyses and response strategies.
Borislav Andric - PeerSpot reviewer
The product is free, and the initial setup is easy, but it is missing some features, and it is not stable
The product is missing some features. Some features are not implemented the way we expect them to be. The tool doesn’t have the same quality as other commercial vendors like Cisco. There were some problems with IPsec. For a long time, the tool did not support VTI tunnels. I also faced some problems with some specific networking solutions. I couldn’t set the source IP. I would like to have a hardware solution in the future.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the significant advantages of Sophos is its affordability compared to other technologies like Check Point and Fortinet."
"One of the most valuable features of Sophos Central is its Synchronized Security."
"One of the standout features is its highly detailed and user-friendly graphical interface."
"The solution's most valuable feature is that we use it predominantly for monitoring and anomaly detection."
"Sophos Central is good. It's also free for all those firewalls because, from Sophos Central, we manage the firewalls and push the policies to the firewall."
"It is easy to manage and configure."
"One of the most valuable features of Sophos Central for maintaining our cybersecurity posture is its ease of use."
"It's highly valuable as it ensures that no unauthorized installations occur without the IT team's permission, maintaining a secure environment."
"It is an open-source product."
 

Cons

"The tool is slow in the Middle East region. It should also integrate custom reporting."
"The product needs to improve monitoring since it gives false positives. It needs also to improve pricing."
"Integration with third party applications should be improved."
"The tamper protection password is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"There were challenges we faced with generating reports for the physical firewall in certain instances."
"Pushing global rules and policies to all devices from Central isn't easy. You can do it for all endpoints, which is fine. But you can't do the same with firewalls. Firewall management with Central is very limited. You can connect one firewall to another and tell it, "I want one policy for all my customer's firewalls," but that's not possible. For a customer with multiple firewalls, you can't say, "This works for France, Great Britain, Canada," and push it. It's not possible."
"The current service level is not as efficient as desired, but we acknowledge that it presents an area for improvement, particularly in terms of support concentration."
"Additionally, Sophos Central can be resource-intensive, demanding servers with a minimum of eight gigabytes of RAM, which may pose considerations for larger organizations dealing with legacy applications tied to specific OS and hardware configurations."
"The product is missing some features."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not cheap, it is expensive. The price is too much."
"The product's pricing was somewhat high. We paid Rs. 1500 INR per license, approximately equivalent to 20 USD."
"The tool's pricing is good."
"It is an affordable solution."
"There is a one-time fee for the hardware and an annual subscription fee, which is pretty good because we can get free updates."
"The product has a reasonable price considering the cybersecurity services it offers."
"It's not considered a cheap solution and falls more in the moderate pricing category."
"The solution is moderately expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
18%
Insurance Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sophos Central?
One of the significant advantages of Sophos is its affordability compared to other technologies like Check Point and Fortinet.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Central?
My thoughts on the pricing or licensing with Sophos Central are that it is very good.
What needs improvement with Sophos Central?
I have read some information a few months ago about the machine learning features in Sophos Central, and I saw that they added an AI tool, AI feature in the Sophos Central console. However, I haven...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VyOS Platform?
It is an open-source product. The free version is not stable. We can have a stable and supported version with a licensing agreement and subscription.
What needs improvement with VyOS Platform?
The product is missing some features. Some features are not implemented the way we expect them to be. The tool doesn’t have the same quality as other commercial vendors like Cisco. There were some ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Darktrace, Trend Micro and others in AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.