SwaggerHub vs webMethods.io comparison

SmartBear and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. SmartBear is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.7. SmartBear holds a 1.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

SwaggerHub

Read 13 SwaggerHub reviews

1,522 Views
1,522 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

9,029 Views
2,618 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

SwaggerHub and webMethods.io are competitor products in the API management and integration solutions space. SwaggerHub takes the lead in user-friendliness, thanks to its intuitive design, while webMethods.io excels in comprehensive integration capabilities suited for complex enterprise needs.

Features: SwaggerHub provides robust API documentation and collaboration tools that enhance the communication within development teams. Its design-first approach supports seamless workflows. On the other hand, webMethods.io offers a wide array of integration features, facilitating the connection of multiple cloud and on-premises applications. Its extensive connectors make it adaptable to complex systems.

Room for Improvement: SwaggerHub could enhance its feature set to accommodate more diverse use cases, improve integration options, and offer better customization capabilities. webMethods.io can work on simplifying its complex integration environment, enhance its user interface, and streamline its configuration processes to improve accessibility for non-enterprise users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SwaggerHub offers an easy and straightforward deployment process focusing on providing effective support. webMethods.io, although more intricate in deployment, offers a strong customer support network that assists with large-scale integrations, ensuring users are guided through more complex implementations.

Pricing and ROI: SwaggerHub is cost-effective and aims for rapid deployment, offering a quicker ROI for smaller projects. In contrast, webMethods.io justifies higher initial costs with its extensive suite of features and potential for significant ROI in enterprises that require scalable solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (5th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.4%
SwaggerHub	1.5%
Other	96.1%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Has streamlined API documentation and integration workflows across cross-functional teams

Documenting SwaggerHub has a standard and consistent structure of API definitions, and it automatically generates interactive documentation which helps the developers to understand everything. There are certain areas where SwaggerHub can go beyond here as formatting options for documentation pages are restricted, and the import and export options of API collections are complex in SwaggerHub. It provides various collaboration tools where we can work and do it. The strong validation against the API maintains conformity and reduces errors. That part is very great in SwaggerHub. Overall, scalability and stability-wise, it varies high compared to the competitors, but there are still certain areas where competitors are providing various customizations. SwaggerHub can understand those aspects and implement them as well. The complex import and export of API calls and collaborations can be challenging in SwaggerHub. If they can make it easier for us, that would be great. Their performance is degraded if there is too much load on the API. The customization and doc formatting options for documentation pages are restricted in SwaggerHub. A few of my teammates have complained that they find the UI unintuitive where it requires multiple clicks for simple tasks. SwaggerHub is a great tool, but these limitations can be addressed to make things better and easier.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"You can click & play and add the notation in a human-readable form. Spotlight is also very good in the graphical design of APIs."

"SwaggerHub plays a crucial role in order to bring teams and automate things faster and also reduce the man-hours and increase the work efficiency."

"It is a stable solution."

"SwaggerHub is helping with team collaboration, as all the people now know the link, they just go there and get the information they need, and it is really a documentation tool for sharing documentation information about the API we support."

"SwaggerHub has significantly improved how my organization designs, documents, and manages APIs, centralizing API management so that all API definitions are stored in one location, which makes it easy for stakeholders, developers, QA, DevOps, and products to access the latest version."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

More SwaggerHub pros

"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."

"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."

"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"WebMethods.io is a powerful tool, but it requires skilled people who can fully utilize its potential."

"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."

"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"In SwaggerHub, I appreciate that it is a powerful platform for API design and collaboration, but currently, the access control is somewhat limited."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"We have to use additional tools to test APIs."

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

"The customization and doc formatting options for documentation pages are restricted in SwaggerHub."

More SwaggerHub cons

"The solution should include REST API calls."

"The configuring of the JWT token would be improved as it is a confusing process. We require more information on this part of the solution."

"The solution's release management feature could be better."

"webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It is an expensive solution and not very suitable for smaller businesses."

"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."

"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

"The tool is cheap."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"The price is high and I give it a five out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

In SwaggerHub, I appreciate that it is a powerful platform for API design and collaboration, but currently, the access control is somewhat limited. I would love to see enhanced permissions allowing...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

I have worked for Arden University, University of Sheffield, and Nanyang Technological University. For those institutions, I used Amazon AppStream for backend validations. When working for Prolific...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SwaggerHub?

Based on my limited experience with SwaggerHub, I can share a few practical recommendations for implementing it effectively. Before onboarding multiple teams, it's important to define naming conven...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft API Manager vs SwaggerHub

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs SwaggerHub

Compared 11% of the time

Apigee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 10% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs SwaggerHub

Compared 8% of the time

Kong Konnect vs SwaggerHub

Compared 4% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 3% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub

January 2026

Download SwaggerHub product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

January 2026

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

SmartBear

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Free Report: SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.