Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Zscaler Client Connector comparison

Trellix and Zscaler are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Zscaler is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.8. Trellix holds a 3.1% mindshare in EDR, compared to Zscaler’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Zscaler Client Connector are competing in the network security category. Trellix demonstrates a competitive edge due to its focus on robust malware protection and security management, whereas Zscaler gains an advantage in cloud security efficiency and user experience.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is equipped with advanced threat prevention (ATP) technology, predictive machine learning, and behavioral analysis for comprehensive malware protection. Its versatile dashboard is customizable for optimal decision-making, and it integrates seamlessly with SIEM or SOAR solutions through ePO console. Zscaler Client Connector offers high-performance cloud-based security, efficient data loss prevention (DLP), and advanced analytics with capabilities like real-time performance monitoring and micro-segmentation.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could enhance cloud-native capabilities and simplify automation processes for broader accessibility. Additionally, addressing automation complexity could significantly streamline operations. Zscaler might benefit from addressing bandwidth dependency issues that affect performance. While its cloud integration is stellar, improvements in early issue detection and response times would enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix employs robust endpoint integration that benefits enterprises with complex security setups. Its support efficiently resolves complex security challenges. Zscaler's cloud-centric model reduces on-premises demands, making quick deployment possible. Its customer service is highly responsive, aiding seamless cloud transitions.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix offers competitively favorable pricing with a strong ROI by addressing various enterprise security requirements. Despite potentially higher initial costs, Zscaler's ROI is justified through its efficient cloud solutions and advanced feature set, resulting in substantial perceived value.

To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Zscaler Client Connector

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.5%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zscaler Client Connector is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.5%
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.1%
Zscaler Client Connector	0.7%
Other	92.7%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

PankajKumar24

IT Manager at Gigabit Technologies Pvt Ltd

Advanced threat prevention has strengthened incident response and customized security workflows

The biggest advantage of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is the ATP solution, which provides advanced threat prevention. Machine learning algorithms are available in the product as part of the threat anti-malware, including predictive machine learning and behavioral analysis, which are integral to the anti-malware module of EPP. In terms of my experience with the machine learning algorithms for analysis and threat detection, we are analyzing logs provided by Trellix, but we are not able to conduct specific machine learning analysis on those logs. The automated response mechanisms in the products help with incident management because we have to create playbooks in Trellix console for automation, which we need to enable. The customizable dashboard of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform definitely contributes to the decision-making process, as we customize the dashboard according to customer requirements. When it comes to integration aspects, we are able to integrate Trellix Endpoint Security Platform with SIEM or SOAR solutions using the ePO console, which enhances threat detection capabilities. Reporting and analytics aspects have an impact on security posture assessment, as we are able to fetch reports in the ePO console customized according to customer requirements for downloading and sending via email.

Read full review

Dimitrios Arvanitakis

IT Support Admin at Kuehne & Nagel Inc.

Client activity has been monitored efficiently through in-depth log analysis and traffic filtering

I use the Zscaler speed test, and it is very nice. We use some logs from Zscaler Client Connector to collect data and see what is happening, such as if there is an interruption or something. There is a specific tunnel version that we have to use because, depending on the internet provider, some of them have lower speed, so we have some issues. This is because of the provider, not from Zscaler. We use Office 365 services and Office applications, and because some connections are slow and they do not have full coverage from the internet provider, we have some issues. If the speed is slow for Zscaler Client Connector connection, then we have issues because if the speed is not good, then Zscaler Client Connector goes down. This may be because they put some policy. Of course, if you use Office 365 services such as Outlook, the minimum bandwidth is 5 megabits and more, so this causes issues if the users do not have a good remote connection. This depends on the companies and the users, so they need to fix it. This is not from us or our company. It is very useful, and the logs are very helpful. When we go to logs, we understand what is happening.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I recommend this solution to others because it is easy to manage, reliable, and overall good to use."

"But overall, when we speak about security and protection, they are one of the top providers."

"The solution doesn't need a high level of technical training."

"One thing that I like about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it is detecting all the suspicious or malicious binaries, and it has integration with Palo Alto Firewall."

"The solution is a new generation XDR that has a lot of artificial intelligence modules."

"The product is mostly automated, and we do not have to make decisions, because all the decisions are made by the product itself and we are not required to create any custom policies since the policies that are created are well defined in the product itself."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is specifically designed to prevent zero-day attacks and is part of an ecosystem of Palo Alto, providing customers with a long-term vision to modify and redesign how security is applied in their company."

"Its interface and pricing are most valuable, and it is better than other vendors in terms of security."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"McAfee has helped our organization by keeping all of our computer systems secure from viruses or other intrusions."

"The product is quite user-friendly."

"It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that."

"Initially, the DLP was very valuable for disabling access to USB drives."

"The setup is not that complex. It takes five to ten minutes to set up."

"The product’s stability and security features enhance user protection and organizational security."

"FireEye Endpoint Security is easy to use and lightweight compared to others."

"The MEP suite has significantly helped us to mitigate the risk of getting malicious content in our network from various mediums."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

"The best features of Zscaler Client Connector are that it gives the client a much more transparent experience, as they don't have to worry about connecting to a VPN."

"I'd rate the solution nine out of ten."

"It is very important to see what is happening between the user and the applications that we have, and to filter the traffic from outbound traffic and inside traffic."

"It is very useful, and the logs are very helpful; when we go to logs, we understand what is happening."

"Zscaler Client Connector is quite scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine or ten out of ten."

"The solution operates in the background seamlessly without the user noticing."

"Zscaler Client Connector has eliminated VPN bottlenecks and outages, improved user productivity with instant secure access, and reduced help desk tickets related to VPN issues, overcoming 60% of VPN-related problems while allowing faster onboarding of remote users and better enforcement of zero-trust security policies."

"The real-time analytics feature in Zscaler Client Connector is another valuable feature called Digital Experience, or ZDX, which can easily identify the root cause of issues accessing public or internal resources and provide good analysis so relevant teams can quickly resolve them, making it a very good tool that helps customers."

Cons

"As an improvement, I would like to see enhanced connection speeds."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."

"It would be better if they could educate the customers more. Some sort of seminars and roadshows will help educate the customers and show what the product can do. The price could be better. It would also help if they had a team for deployment and support."

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"Data privacy is a matter of concern. You have to be careful with data privacy, it can be sensitive and Cortex can have most of your access."

"The technical support is not very good. I find the process difficult."

"If you compare it to SentinelOne, which has more functionalities and detection capabilities on an open platform, the pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks."

"It would be good if they could make an exception for applications. Sometimes, it can be a bit of a challenge to make exceptions for certain applications that have been used as rogue."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"An area in need of improvement involves the overview, which usually does not enable one to get the value in reports."

"They could improve it by providing better manageability for administrators. I need to spend too much time on this right now."

"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive."

"McAfee is not as strong as other solutions like Kaspersky, Trend Micro, or Carbon Black."

"Malware detection can be better. It doesn't have support and detection for the recent malware, but it has a compensatory control where it can do the behavior-based assessment and alert you when there is something malicious or unexpected. For example, when a certain user is executing the privilege command, which is not normal. These dynamic detections are good, and they compensate for malware detection."

"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."

"It would be nice if the solution was a bit more stable."

"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

"Zscaler Client Connector is not low in cost; it is definitely on the higher side."

"There is a hard learning curve for Zscaler Client Connector; their support isn't the greatest all the time."

"There is room for improvement regarding the price of Zscaler Client Connector, as it is one of the most expensive solutions available."

"If the speed is slow for Zscaler Client Connector connection, then we have issues because if the speed is not good, then Zscaler Client Connector goes down."

"I rate this product nine out of ten because I have seen some minor instability issues after updates and some room for UI improvement for deeper analytics, with instances of major issues after updating the GCC that required rollbacks."

"The stability of Zscaler Client Connector needs improvement, as it often disconnects and reconnects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the cost as four to five, considering it's normal compared to other products. I find it nominal and worth the money."

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."

"The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very low, and it offers both perpetual and subscription licenses. With a perpetual license, the product will keep working as long as it's not end-of-life, which benefits companies."

"It is reasonably priced."

"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."

"The product is expensive."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	68
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	67

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?

I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler Client Connector?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is fair, though it is a bit costly. It oper...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler Client Connector?

For Zscaler Client Connector, I would appreciate more granular control over the client update rollout and slightly fa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zscaler Client Connector?

My main use case of Zscaler Client Connector is to provide secure, seamless access to the internet and internal appli...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 12% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 6% of the time

More Zscaler Client Connector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

May 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Client Connector

May 2026

Download Zscaler Client Connector product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Zscaler Client Connector enhances network security by providing seamless access to applications, ensuring a safe and efficient digital experience. It is designed for businesses needing comprehensive protection and optimized resource access within a unified platform.

Organizations deploy Zscaler Client Connector to securely connect users to applications while maintaining robust data protection standards. It eliminates the need for traditional gateways by offering direct-to-cloud security, which enhances performance and reduces complexity. This solution is ideal for remote work environments where secure and efficient application access is required. It simplifies IT infrastructures, allowing businesses to scale without compromising security.

What are the key features of Zscaler Client Connector?

Zero Trust Access: Provides secure connectivity by validating user identities and context.
Cloud Firewall: Ensures robust protection by inspecting all traffic for potential threats.
Bandwidth Control: Manages network resources to optimize application performance.
Seamless User Experience: Integrates smoothly into existing environments with minimal disruption.
Comprehensive Visibility: Offers detailed analytics and reporting for informed decision-making.

What are the benefits users should expect?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against cyber threats with advanced protocols.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by streamlining IT management and reducing hardware dependencies.
Scalability: Easily adapts to organizational growth or changes in IT requirements.
Enhanced Productivity: Increases workflow efficiency by ensuring secure and rapid access to necessary applications.
Reduced Latency: Direct-to-cloud connectivity minimizes lag and improves user experience.

Zscaler Client Connector is widely adopted across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where secure data transmission and compliance are critical. In finance, it supports secure transactions and data protection. For healthcare, it ensures HIPAA compliance, and in retail, it simplifies secure customer-facing services. Each industry benefits from tailored implementations that address specific security and connectivity challenges.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Zscaler Client Connector

June 2026

Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Zscaler Client Connector

Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Zscaler Client Connector and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Zscaler Client Connector report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.