Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Zscaler Client Connector Logo

Top 10 Zscaler Client Connector Alternatives

Vendor: Zscaler
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Zscaler Client Connector Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Zscaler Client Connector based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, and Microsoft Defender XDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Zscaler Client Connector surpasses its competitors by offering seamless and secure remote access with advanced threat protection, robust policy enforcement, and user-friendly deployment, ensuring optimal performance and comprehensive coverage for businesses of all sizes.

Zscaler Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Zscaler, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint seamlessly integrates with Windows, offering advanced threat detection and response. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector focuses on cloud-based security and Zero Trust architecture, appealing to organizations prioritizing secure remote access and internet threat protection.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's setup cost is lower than Zscaler Client Connector, highlighting a key cost difference in initial investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's setup cost is lower than Zscaler Client Connector, highlighting a key cost difference in initial investment.
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in endpoint protection using AI for real-time threat responses. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector offers robust cloud-native internet security. Tech buyers might choose SentinelOne for efficient endpoint defense or Zscaler for expansive network-level protection.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a straightforward setup cost, while Zscaler Client Connector involves higher initial expenses, making SentinelOne a more cost-effective option.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a straightforward setup cost, while Zscaler Client Connector involves higher initial expenses, making SentinelOne a more cost-effective option.
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender XDR thrives on its integration with Microsoft 365, offering comprehensive threat detection. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector’s strong cloud-based protections and zero-trust architecture appeal to cloud-first organizations. Defender XDR benefits from its integration, while Zscaler's deployment is ideal for cloud environments.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report
Microsoft Defender XDR offers a lower setup cost compared to Zscaler Client Connector, highlighting a budget-friendly option for users. Meanwhile, Zscaler Client Connector provides higher upfront investment, suggesting a substantial focus on comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender XDR offers a lower setup cost compared to Zscaler Client Connector, highlighting a budget-friendly option for users. Meanwhile, Zscaler Client Connector provides higher upfront investment, suggesting a substantial focus on comprehensive security features.
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
Huntress Managed EDR attracts tech buyers with its affordability and robust endpoint security. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector appeals to those needing comprehensive network security and seamless cloud integration, despite its complex deployment and higher costs.
Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report
Huntress Managed EDR requires a straightforward setup cost, while Zscaler Client Connector involves a more complex installation process, highlighting the distinctions between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Huntress Managed EDR requires a straightforward setup cost, while Zscaler Client Connector involves a more complex installation process, highlighting the distinctions between the two solutions.
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium offers extensive endpoint visibility and management, ideal for organizations needing strong threat detection. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector provides seamless cloud application access with its zero-trust model, making it perfect for remote workforces favoring cloud-first strategies and scalable security solutions.
Download Tanium vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to Zscaler Client Connector, with Zscaler being more budget-friendly in terms of initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to Zscaler Client Connector, with Zscaler being more budget-friendly in terms of initial investment.
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers cost-effective comprehensive threat protection and seamless integration, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector excels in agile deployment and advanced cloud security features, attracting those prioritizing robust cloud protection despite higher initial costs.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a higher setup cost, while Zscaler Client Connector offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a higher setup cost, while Zscaler Client Connector offers a more budget-friendly option.
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is valued for its cost-effectiveness and strong customer support. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector provides advanced cloud-based security features appealing to those needing seamless network management. Pricing and deployment ease are key differentiators for tech buyers considering these solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, contrasting with Zscaler Client Connector's more involved setup process, potentially leading to higher initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, contrasting with Zscaler Client Connector's more involved setup process, potentially leading to higher initial expenditure.
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint appeals to tech buyers with its sophisticated threat detection and robust malware protection. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector attracts with superior cloud scalability and comprehensive network protection, making it a preferred choice for those prioritizing extensive security integration and seamless system deployment.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a competitive setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Zscaler Client Connector's setup is priced higher, highlighting a significant distinction in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a competitive setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Zscaler Client Connector's setup is priced higher, highlighting a significant distinction in initial investment.
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
Zscaler Client Connector Logo
OpenText Endpoint Response
1 out of 5
OpenText Endpoint Response appeals to those seeking cost-effective, in-depth threat detection and detailed forensics. In comparison, Zscaler Client Connector attracts buyers desiring seamless cloud integration and comprehensive web protection, justifying its higher price with cloud-centric features and efficient deployment.
OpenText Endpoint Response offers transparent setup costs, allowing for easier budgeting, while Zscaler Client Connector presents a variable setup cost structure, potentially surprising users with additional fees.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Endpoint Response offers transparent setup costs, allowing for easier budgeting, while Zscaler Client Connector presents a variable setup cost structure, potentially surprising users with additional fees.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)