Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] vs Veracode comparison

Trend Micro Cloud App Secur...

Read 208 Veracode reviews

32,067 Views
15,713 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 26, 2026

Veracode and Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] compete in the application security space. Veracode holds an edge due to its comprehensive testing and lifecycle integration.

Features: Veracode offers application security testing with static and dynamic analysis, providing invaluable code analysis and vulnerability management tools. This facilitates the identification of potential issues before deployment. Its integration capabilities within the software development lifecycle, along with wide language and platform coverage, make it a robust choice for developers. Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] secures cloud applications, offering strong email protection and user data security across platforms like SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and Outlook, thus appealing to Microsoft ecosystem-based organizations.

Room for Improvement: Veracode faces challenges with false positives, UI intuitiveness, and integration in certain environments. Users seek better language support, API usability, and faster scan times. There are also suggestions for enhanced report generation and integration into modern workflows like CI/CD pipelines. Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] could improve by enhancing DLP features, integrating better with on-premises setups, and reducing false positives in alerts. Users request expanded integration to encompass private and public clouds for enhanced versatility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode supports multiple deployment models, including on-premises and various cloud solutions, offering flexibility to organizations. Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] focuses primarily on public cloud deployment, potentially limiting organizations that require diverse solutions. Customer service experiences are mixed for both; Veracode is often praised for knowledgeable support, despite some responsiveness concerns, while Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] is appreciated for streamlined support but needs improvements in integration and personalized sessions.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode's pricing reflects its extensive feature range and robust integration, though it might seem costly for smaller enterprises. Larger organizations might benefit from its comprehensive suite to reduce reliance on multiple vendors. Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] is reasonably priced compared to rivals, with value more evident when bundled with other Trend Micro solutions. Both products offer significant ROI through enhanced security and compliance, but Veracode's breadth of services may provide immediate savings via improved code safety and reduced vulnerability expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Application Security Tools

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trend Micro Cloud App Secur...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Container Security (14th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd)

Featured Reviews

Anuradha Buluwala

Head of Technical at Connex Information Technologies Pvt Ltd

Useful for cloud data protection, particularly for email and file-sharing systems

For improvements, I think it would be great if Trend Micro Cloud App Security could enhance their product to be a single SASE solution. It should be similar to competitors like Palo Alto. The solution should also expand integration from the public cloud to the private cloud and add Cloud DLP and CASB features.

Read full review

Yash Shende

Software Development Engineer II at Rocket Software

Monthly scans have provided baseline security but still miss critical vulnerabilities

Veracode can improve to stand in this market. They do not have to do much; they just need to improve their UI experience and add more documentation within the application rather than just creating documentation pages on different websites. They need to ensure their web application guides whoever uses it. Since whoever uses Veracode must be a technical person, they just need to guide them to the actual points. They can also improve their security capabilities by adding more filters to identify what vulnerabilities their application has. They need to improve their scanning engine to scan for more critical defects. Also, the integration part can be enhanced by adding features to integrate with a CLI, such as introducing a CLI version or a Jenkins plugin. If such features exist, they should show it as a pop-up, signaling that they have a new feature. Currently, it feels Veracode from two years ago is still the same, so that is something Veracode needs to improve. They can improve the security part. Some of the severe security issues were never caught by Veracode in the reports. In fact, I have never seen any high or critical severity issues pop up in my Veracode report. That is one thing they can improve on their scanning ability to catch high severity issues. Next is integration; Veracode does not provide any tools to integrate with Jenkins or CLI. I do not even know if there is any CLI for Veracode that I can use to automate in my pipeline. The last thing is the UI interface that they have, as it is a bit confusing. I remember we did not have the capability to handle authentications of our internal application. We had to write Selenium code using a Selenium IDE. To write a Selenium script for a Veracode scan, you have to download a Selenium IDE, record it, and then paste that file into Veracode. I can see that Selenium IDE is already decommissioned, so it is no longer used by anyone. Still, we have to use it because Veracode only supports that kind of file for Selenium to automate. They can add more ways to authenticate our application using normal JavaScript or Python or Shell script. I feel these are the four main points. They can document it more by adding tooltips into the application that explain why a parameter is required and what other options are available. For the same example with the Selenium script, they can add a link to their documentation that explains what other kinds of scripts can be written for authentication. I feel they can also make the UI more intuitive so that whoever uses it can guide themselves, as whoever uses Veracode is already a technical person.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to integrate."

"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms."

"I find Trend Micro Cloud App Security useful for scanning our email boxes. We can scan them one by one, which is a good feature. It's not just gateway-level protection - we integrate the email system with it. They have special protection and parameters for phishing emails."

"This is a very dependable solution and we are able to have a lot of Trend Micro security products integrated between each other."

"Our business emails are very important and Trend Micro Cloud App Security has provided a high level of protection. Additionally, there are updating the solution frequently."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"It has more intelligence features than other vendors."

"Dependable with ease of integration with other security products."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] pros

"Ensures our code and system are 100% compliant."

"The product was great."

"Static, dynamic, and manual scan features were all very useful for us and helped us fix many security flaws."

"I found the solution pretty straightforward, and I'm not terribly technical."

"To me, the principal feature is the CLI (command-line interface) because I put together a lot of implementations using it. Another important aspect is the low false-positive rate because the solution is very configurable. It is as low as 1 percent and that is a huge difference compared to competitors."

"We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle."

"The most valuable feature is the SAST capability and its integration into the Veracode pipelines."

"Veracode has good support for microservices, and I also like the sandbox environment. For example, when introducing a new component, we can scan it in a sandbox environment. It will not impact the main environment. When our team fixes it, they. can push it to the production environment when the results are acceptable."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"For improvements, I think it would be great if Trend Micro Cloud App Security could enhance their product to be a single SASE solution. It should be similar to competitors like Palo Alto."

"The solution's technical support services could be better."

"There is room for improvement in the DLP component of Trend Micro Cloud App Security."

"The price of the solution could improve by being lower."

"The cost of the license is on the high side."

"Documentation could be improved; product cost is quite high."

"The granulation of the policy setup needs to be better. Right now, it is too basic."

"They should provide separate corporate-level licenses for two to three instances."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] cons

"Veracode doesn't really help you so much when it comes to fixing things. It is able to find our vulnerabilities but the remediation activities it does provide are not a straight out-of-the-box kind of model. We need to work on remediation and not completely rely on Veracode."

"The Veracode platform probably hasn't improved our organization overall, although through no fault of theirs."

"Static scanning takes a long time, so you need to patiently wait for the scan to achieve. I also think the software could be more accurate. It isn't 100 percent, so you shouldn't completely rely on Veracode. You need to manually verify its findings."

"There needs to be better API integration to the development team's pipeline, which is something that is missing and needs to be improved."

"It can be a bit complex because it takes a lot of time to have it complete the task."

"It's pretty efficient, but sometimes the static analysis is prone to a lot of false positives."

"The feature that allows me to read which mitigation answer was submitted, and to approve it, requires me to use do so in different screens. That makes it a little bit more complicated because I have to read and then I have to go back and make sure it falls under the same number ID number. That part is a little bit complicated from my perspective, because that's what I use the most."

"I would also like to see some improvement in the speed. That is really the only complaint, but in all reality we have a massive Java application that needs to be scanned. Our developers are saying, "It takes 72 hours to scan it." That is probably the nature of the beast, and I'm actually pretty accepting of that time frame, but since it's a complaint that I get, faster is always better. I don't necessarily think that the speed is bad as it is, just that faster would be better."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is expensive for regular users. There are not any hidden fees. First-time users of the solution should purchase implementation packages or professional services."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"The product's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The cost of the license is on the high side. It's a yearly subscription."

"The pricing of the solution could be better."

"It's very expensive, especially when you are a very small organization. If you're using Veracode at an individual level, for example, you're a developer or you run agents, the pricing might not affect you, but if you're using it at a company level to troubleshoot security issues, the pricing is not quite favorable. It may affect ROI."

"Regarding licensing, pay very close attention to what applications you're going to need to do dynamic scanning for, versus static. Right now, the way the licensing is set up, if you don't have any static elements for a website, you can certainly avoid some costs by doing more dynamic licenses. You need to pay very close attention to that, because if you find out later that you have static code elements - like Java scripts, etc. - that you want to have scanned statically, having the two licenses bundled together will actually save you money."

"I don't really get too involved in the cost sides of things that's in my job, I'm more of a technical focus, but I have heard from my manager and a couple other people that the solution is quite expensive."

"I'm unfamiliar with the solution's pricing, but it must be worth the cost from a company perspective, as we have been using it for years and have no plans to move away from it."

"Negotiate some, but their prices are reasonable."

"The Veracode price model is based on application profiles, which is how you package your components for scanning."

"Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive."

"Licensing is pretty flexible. It's a little bit weird, it's by the size of the binary, which is a strange way to license a product. So far they've been pretty flexible about it."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	70
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	114

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Strobes vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

F-Secure Total vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] Competitors

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

GitLab vs Veracode

Compared 2% of the time

Invicti vs Veracode

Compared 2% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Application Security Tools

Download Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] product report

Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] report

Download Veracode product report

Also Known As

No data available

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] is a scalable and stable solution that enhances email protection and provides robust integration with Trend Micro offerings. It supports cloud infrastructures with advanced features like DLP and URL detection and is easy to install and manage.

This security tool is specifically designed to augment data security across platforms such as SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and Outlook. With features such as phishing protection and integration with Global Threat Intelligence and Vision One, it delivers comprehensive security visibility. It efficiently blocks threats like phishing, spam, and malware in Office 365 and Google Workspace environments. Though recognized for its reliability, it requires improvements in pricing structure, documentation quality, and advanced policy management. Moreover, integration enhancements with Microsoft classification methods and DLP module support would enhance its competitiveness.

What are the main features of Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL]?

Integration with Trend Micro: Seamlessly connects with other Trend Micro solutions for holistic security.
DLP and URL Detection: Protects sensitive data and identifies malicious URLs effectively.
Phishing and Spam Protection: Advanced scanning for enhanced security against threats.
Global Threat Intelligence: Utilizes global insights for proactive threat detection.
Vision One Platform: Integrates for improved security visibility and management.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Scalability: Easily expands with organizational needs while maintaining performance.
Stability: Reliable operations with minimal disruptions in various environments.
Ease of Installation: Simplifies deployment for administrators, saving time and resources.
Advanced Integration: Enhances data security across widely used software systems.
Cost-Effective: Provides robust protection with minimal administrative overhead.

Trending across specific industries, Trend Micro Cloud App Security [EOL] addresses the needs of businesses relying on cloud platforms. Its emphasis on securing email communications and integrating with popular applications like SharePoint and OneDrive makes it ideal for sectors prioritizing data protection. The ability to detect ransomware and malware in real-time complements industries focused on minimizing cyber threats. Although powerful within public cloud settings, its potential expansion into private clouds offers further opportunities for IT departments to bolster security frameworks across diverse infrastructures.

TrendAI

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

MedImpact Healthcare Systems, ClubCorp USA, Copa Airlines, Aava, Azra Solutions, BSN INET Co, Ltd, Carhartt

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

Application Security Tools