

Zapier and webMethods.io are key competitors in the integration platform category. Zapier seems to have the upper hand for its ease of use and wide variety of integrations, making it more accessible for small to medium businesses. webMethods.io dominates in enterprise-level integrations due to its deep system capabilities and robust support infrastructure.
Features: Zapier provides a wide array of pre-built integrations, allowing users to connect systems without coding and automate tasks with multi-step Zaps and webhooks. Its webhook function supports connections with numerous applications, and it's known for quick setups. webMethods.io, on the other hand, excels with robust enterprise-level features, strong API management, and comprehensive support for integration standards. Its integration server and trading networks server provide a powerful platform for application and business process integration.
Room for Improvement: Zapier could enhance its capabilities for more complex workflows and improved error reporting. Users would appreciate expanded integration with lesser-known tools and better support. webMethods.io needs to improve its documentation and simplify setup processes. There's also room for advancements in integration with modern platforms and refined pricing and cloud scalability options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zapier's deployment is straightforward, especially for public cloud solutions, making it accessible for non-technical users. Its customer service, while efficient, lacks real-time chat support. webMethods.io offers flexible deployment options across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, but requires greater technical expertise. Its customer support is generally responsive, although licensing and version upgrades pose challenges for some users.
Pricing and ROI: Zapier appeals to startups and small businesses with its free version and scalable options, though its pricing can be high for extensive use. Users find the ROI justifiable through resource savings and workflow efficiency. webMethods.io is more suitable for large enterprises, reflecting its higher price point with robust capabilities and comprehensive support. Its licensing flexibility is appreciated, though it may be expensive for smaller organizations. Both tools offer advantages in terms of ROI, depending on the complexity and scale of business operations.
In a scenario where employing three resources for three months might cost approximately $18,000 to $20,000, Zapier provides substantial cost savings.
An incident portal is available where we can raise tickets and based on priority, they reply.
Their technical support is good; they respond promptly and are very helpful.
This can help if you need assistance, as you can communicate with the community and support system, and most issues are already resolved by AI.
The experience was positive with prompt responses from their team.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
If any webMethods.io product is installed on-premises and a company wants to scale its application, either vertical scaling or horizontal scaling is needed.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
Zapier is suitable for small or simpler automation but not for complex ones.
Scaling it gets quite expensive, and while I cannot evaluate it purely from a technology perspective, compared to Workato, I would give Zapier a seven for scalability.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
In my current company, we had significant challenges with Zapier regarding maintenance, as Zaps were often broken, not necessarily due to Zapier, but due to changes in the input variables.
webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional.
When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
The error message options in the dashboard should be improved. It should be user-friendly so that beginners or non-technical users can figure out the problems and solutions on their own.
You can build similar or dependent automations in one Zap, which helps with understanding the process without switching between different records.
Having flexibility in creating more complex automation would eliminate the need to transform data within the source or destination.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
The pricing is in accordance with market standards and even lower in some cases.
The pricing of Zapier is slightly higher compared to other market automation tools such as Pabbly, Make.com, and N8N, which have good features but are priced lower than Zapier.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
If we want to make a REST API, SOAP, REST, or any other type, all kinds of things are put in one box and we can make anything we want to.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
They have approximately 7,000 connections.
The automation capabilities are impressive.
Creating integration points through webhooks is particularly useful for anyone working on integration projects.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| webMethods.io | 4.4% |
| Zapier | 2.5% |
| Other | 93.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
Zapier connects thousands of apps, enabling seamless automation without coding. It supports webhooks, multi-step tasks, and a wide array of integrations. Despite needing enhancements in Google Sheets capabilities, API limits, and UI, it remains a tool for boosting productivity across many sectors.
By linking tools such as Google Sheets, HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, Zapier allows users to automate workflows without coding expertise. Its integrations serve logistics operations, CRM, and social media management. Users can process tracking exceptions and streamline operations with third-party software like QuickBooks, Zoho, and Power BI. Although users suggest features like better Google Sheets handling and improved collaboration tools, Zapier continues to provide expansive automation, enhancing efficiency and facilitating new opportunities through integrations.
What Features Stand Out in Zapier?In logistics, Zapier enhances operations by automating exception tracking and third-party software integration. Its use in CRM and social media streamlines lead creation and workflow automation. Users from diverse industries leverage its extensive connectivity to support intelligence management, generate analytical insights, and execute cross-functional tasks efficiently.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.