Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Defensics Protocol Fuzzing Logo

Defensics Protocol Fuzzing pros and cons

Vendor: Black Duck
4.3 out of 5
 

Defensics Protocol Fuzzing Pros review quotes

it_user240843 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Product Validation Apprentice Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jun 3, 2015
Simple and straightforward GUI.
it_user586716 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Secutiy Engineer at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees
Jan 15, 2017
ROI was 100%. Since there are no product suites available that provide the level of testing available with Codenomicon, the development, quality and security assurance departments know that the investment was correct.
it_user508521 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Lead Engineer - Product Security at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jul 30, 2018
We have found multiple issues in our embedded system network protocols, related to buffer overflow. We have reduced some of these issues.
Find out what your peers are saying about Defensics Protocol Fuzzing vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SK
Senior Technical Lead at HCL Technologies
Jun 5, 2019
The product is related to US usage with TLS contact fees, i.e. how more data center connections will help lower networking costs.
 

Defensics Protocol Fuzzing Cons review quotes

it_user240843 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Product Validation Apprentice Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jun 3, 2015
You can't implement proprietary ciphering algorithms, nor can you modify protocol models if you need to test customized public protocols.
it_user586716 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Secutiy Engineer at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees
Jan 15, 2017
It requires understanding the Defensics protocol.
it_user508521 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Lead Engineer - Product Security at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jul 30, 2018
Sometimes, when we are testing embedded devices, when we trigger the test cases, the target will crash immediately. It is very difficult for us to identify the root cause of the crash because they do not provide sophisticated tools on the target side. They cover only the client-side application... They do not have diagnostic tools for the target side. Rather, they have them but they are very minimal and not very helpful.
Find out what your peers are saying about Defensics Protocol Fuzzing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SK
Senior Technical Lead at HCL Technologies
Jun 5, 2019
Codenomicon Defensics should be more advanced for the testing sector. It should be somewhat easy and flexible to install.