We use the Unity as the SAN for our data center. It's where all of our data lives right now, for our main office. It has exceeded our expectations.
Network Storage Admin at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Simplifies our instance to one storage pool; integrates very well with VMware
Pros and Cons
- "We have simplified it down to where we're using one storage pool inside the Unity, whereas on the VNX, we had multiple storage pools. This has simplified that aspect for us. It would depend on each organization. We're heavy into VMware and this ties into it so simply. It's made it a lot easier for us. I create a datastore inside Unity, it just shows up in VMware. I love that tie-in."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
We have simplified it down to where we're using one storage pool inside the Unity, whereas on the VNX, we had multiple storage pools. This has simplified that aspect for us. It would depend on each organization. We're heavy into VMware and this ties into it so simply. It's made it a lot easier for us.
What is most valuable?
We're very familiar with the VNX series, we were using VNX before Unity. The features sets are very similar but what I like is the way it ties into VMware. When I create a datastore inside Unity, it just shows up in VMware. I love that tie-in.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability is excellent. We have never had downtime with Unity.
Buyer's Guide
Dell Unity XT
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Dell Unity XT. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is great. We haven't scaled up very much, but it's definitely easy to do.
How are customer service and support?
We have only had to use technical support for firmware upgrades. They are helpful.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using VNX. Our Dell rep stays in touch with us fairly often. He keeps us knowledgeable about things that are up and coming and what might be a good fit for us. The business makes the decision.
When looking at a vendor what's important are
- price
- support
- the product.
Price is definitely going to be a factor. More than that, you want something that's solid. You're going to pay a little bit more for something that performs better and is more efficient at what it does, makes your life easier.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was fairly straightforward.
What other advice do I have?
We're probably going to go away from the Unity and end up using VxRail and vSan. Hyperconvergence is all the rage, that is where everything is going, so that's where we're headed. We need the hyperconverged, we need the elasticity - that we can spin things up and spin them down quickly and easily. We can't do that right now.
I would definitely steer a colleague towards Unity if they were looking at that versus NetApp, for example.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

IT Techinal Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Simple configuration enables adding datastores on VMFS5 to any clusters on your vSphere organization
Pros and Cons
- "VMware integration: Grants both the Storage and Virtual Administrator the ability to create and mount datastores, or even to check how much space each VM is consuming."
- "Compression and block deduplication on non-all-flash solutions."
How has it helped my organization?
With a such a simple configuration you can add datastores on VMFS5 to any clusters on your vSphere organization.
What is most valuable?
- VMware integration: Grants both the Storage and Virtual Administrator the ability to create and mount datastores, or even to check how much space each VM is consuming.
- Block compression on F Models: Compression on F Models or in flash pools allows us to almost duplicate the available space on the array; more space for less money, everyone likes this.
- Simple management: The simple GUI implemented on the Unity arrays simplifies management.
What needs improvement?
Compression and block deduplication on non-all-flash solutions. I know it should not be easy to reach flash-like compression on mechanical disks, but it would bring this array to the top of the charts. And, of course, the block deduplication in mechanical pools. As I said above, everybody likes the "more space for less money" formula.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There were issues with the earlier releases, not now.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Dell Unity XT
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Dell Unity XT. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Supervisor
It's easy to manage and the interface is great
Pros and Cons
- "It’s helped with the overall stability of our VMware environment."
How has it helped my organization?
It’s helped with the overall stability of our VMware environment.
What is most valuable?
We use it to provide VMware VMFS to our VMware environment. Also, we use it for replication of data stores to another EMC Unity 300. This works fantastically.
- It’s easy to manage.
- The interface is great.
- Underlying functionality works well.
What needs improvement?
The only improvement would be a lower cost per unit/disks, however on the whole we are very pleased with this product.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
None whatsoever. A big update was released in which Dell contacted us and did the upgrade.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
None whatsoever. We expanded both our EMC Unity disks by 10TB without any disruption or issues. Simply added the disks, then created further data stores.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We moved away from NetApp FAS storage and really like EMC Unity.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Owner at Lnetwork
Has good capabilities for block-access, file access, and center box
Pros and Cons
- "The feature that I have found most valuable is the unified storage. Also, its capabilities for block-access, file access, and the center box."
- "In terms of what could be improved, I would say its capacity and its connection."
What is our primary use case?
We use Dell EMC Unity XT for its normal application for DB, Oracle, SQL and VMware and the file system, too.
What is most valuable?
The feature that I have found most valuable is the unified storage and its capabilities for block-access, file access, and the center box.
What needs improvement?
In terms of what could be improved, I would say its capacity and its connection.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It has good stability
It requires only one technician for deployment and maintenance.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Its scalability is good.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is very good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very easy.
What other advice do I have?
I can advise that Dell EMC Unity XT is a good solution.
On a scale of one to ten I would give it a 9.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Data Center Architect at Iron Bow Technologies
Seamless data migration from VNX, and VDI performance is very good
Pros and Cons
- "Key features are ease of use, ease of management, ease of deployment, and the GUI is very user-friendly."
- "Perhaps if they added more 10GB ports to the back of the system, so you have more IOPS out of the box itself to the network, that would help."
What is our primary use case?
Lately, the biggest use I've seen is around VDI and data migrations - migrating from the old VNX platform onto a new Unity.
So far so good. Everybody has been very happy with it. It has been a very seamless transition. The performance, from a VDI perspective, has been very good. They are very happy with it.
What is most valuable?
- Ease of use
- Ease of management
- Ease of deployment
- The GUI is very user-friendly.
What needs improvement?
I don't see a lot of room for improvement. Perhaps if they added more 10GB ports to the back of the system, so you have more IOPS out of the box itself to the network, that would help. But other than that it's a great platform.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is awesome. It is very stable. No issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues with scalability. It is very good.
How is customer service and technical support?
Our customers have only had to use technical support for replacing drives and things like that. When they do, they are able to get through to the right people and get the help they need.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very straightforward. Very easy.
What other advice do I have?
Definitely do it.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
Solution Architect at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Customers like the availability guarantee
Pros and Cons
- "On the Data Domain side, the most attractive feature is the compression ratio, which none of the other products in the market are currently able to provide. On the Unity side, what customers mostly like is the availability guarantee."
What is our primary use case?
I have a few customers who are using Dell EMC products for storage, backup, and other different purposes.
What is most valuable?
On the Data Domain side, the most attractive feature is the compression ratio, which none of the other products in the market are currently able to provide. On the Unity side, what customers mostly like is the availability guarantee.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Dell EMC Unity XT for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This product has been stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Dell EMC Unity is scalable.
What was our ROI?
This product does bring a ROI. As I have seen, it helps them to protect their investment since it is future-proof and scalable, so they don't have to change products every year or so. Because of those things, I have seen customers using the EMC product for more than three years.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
When I see other products—like HP, Huawei, and Lenovo—from competitors, I have seen a lot of disadvantages with EMC, price-wise. Huawei and Lenovo are very price competitive.
Looking at the price point for a country like Sri Lanka, where we have a very low economy, I think you need to look at a pricing mechanism that is a bit more flexible.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Dell EMC Unity an eight out of ten because, economically, there are a few things that Dell needs to improve.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
IT System Admin Lead at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Snapshot performance is key for us, along with improved recoveries
Pros and Cons
- "The way it takes the Snaps, that is one of the best features. Snapshot performance is what is key in the Unity, compared to a traditional VNX."
- "The VNX reporting is much more granular, versus the Unity reporting."
What is our primary use case?
The first time we got a Unity was last year. We started deploying some of our file system data into it. We have been seeing a significant improvement, not just the way that we take Snaps, but with the recoveries as well. We're also using it for block storage.
What is most valuable?
The way it takes the Snaps, that is one of the best features. Snapshot performance is what is key in the Unity, compared to a traditional VNX.
What needs improvement?
The reporting, I'm comparing the VNX with Unity. The VNX reporting is much more granular. The information that we need in terms of the IOPS, for example, and things like what my compression value is, that kind of information is pretty straightforward and you can just go to the dashboard and look for the information.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Unity is a pretty stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I know there are new, scalable versions of Unity that are out there. We recently have been getting more because our data is increasing. Recently we got the latest Unity model, and we are planning to convert most of our VNX data over to the Unity at some point.
How is customer service and technical support?
Technical support is five stars out of five. Every time it has dialed home for any of the issues that we have, so far we have seen very good support from EMC.
The new upgrades, the processors get changed, a new box comes in, there are new security vulnerabilities that the security team will ask us to analyze; those are the issues where we ask support for that information. We get a response pretty quickly.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate other solutions. We have been an EMC shop for a very long time and we will continue to use it.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Manager
We find the DR plans, RPO, and RTO beneficial to our organization, but the GUI updates need improvement
What is most valuable?
Replication: Disaster Recovery (DR) plans, RPO and RTO. Replication and ease of storage setup for block LUN’s and VMware.
How has it helped my organization?
Same answer as most valuable features.
What needs improvement?
GUI updates. I had several hours helping support troubleshoot the difference in what the system was doing compared to what the GUI said.
For how long have I used the solution?
Less than a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Sure did.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Dell Unity XT Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Product Categories
All-Flash StoragePopular Comparisons
Dell PowerStore
Pure Storage FlashArray
NetApp AFF
Pure FlashArray X NVMe
IBM FlashSystem
Pure Storage FlashBlade
HPE Nimble Storage
HPE Alletra Storage
HPE Primera
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Huawei OceanStor Dorado
Dell PowerMax
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform
Lenovo ThinkSystem DE Series
Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Dell Unity XT Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- EMC VNX 2500 or EMC Unity 400. Which one is the newer and better Storage and why?
- Dell EMC Unity vs NetApp All Flash FAS, which do you recommend?
- What is the Biggest Difference Between Dell EMC Unity and NetApp AFF?
- Any advice re Dell PowerMax? We are looking at Unity and PowerMax, and also HPE.
- When it comes to performance and pricing, what is the biggest difference between Dell EMC Unity and IBM FlashSystem?
- How does Dell's EMC PowerStore compare with its EMC Unity XT?
- Which solution do you prefer: Dell PowerStore 1200 or Dell Unity 400?
- What do you think about Dell EMC PowerStore? Is it actually a new product?
- How would you compare All-Flash Storage Arrays: Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F vs HPE Nimble Storage vs Dell EMC Unity XT?
- Dell EMC XtremIO Flash Storage OR Hitachi Virtual Storage F Series