Top 10 Endtest Alternatives

Name: Endtest
Brand: Endtest

Top Endtest Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Endtest based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include OpenText Functional Testing, Katalon Studio, and Qt Squish. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Endtest Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Endtest, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

OpenText Functional Testing

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing supports large-scale operations with customized scenarios and enterprise integration. In comparison, Endtest appeals to buyers with its no-code interface and cross-browser testing, enhancing adaptability. OpenText's deployment support contrasts with Endtest's rapid cloud-based setup.

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing has a higher setup cost, while Endtest offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a significant cost disparity.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing has a higher setup cost, while Endtest offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a significant cost disparity.

Katalon Studio

4.0 out of 5

Katalon Studio

4.0 out of 5

Katalon Studio excels in web, mobile, UI, and API test automation, assisting in regression, continuous integration, and end-to-end tests. Its user-friendliness, record-playback features, integration with Jenkins, and comprehensive reporting stand out. Challenges include object spy brittleness, limited integration support, and high pricing. It serves healthcare, fintech, and education sectors effectively.

Pricing

There is no cost for setup or licensing.

This product is freeware, so there is no charge for using it.

View comparison

Pricing

There is no cost for setup or licensing.

This product is freeware, so there is no charge for using it.

Qt Squish

4.4 out of 5

Qt Squish

4.4 out of 5

Qt Squish excels in GUI and regression testing for embedded systems, supporting platforms like Windows and Linux. Compatible with Python and other scripting languages, it integrates with CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, enhancing testing efficiency. Although popular, it needs improvement in pricing, reporting, and streamlining UI component identification.

Pricing

The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year.

It is expensive.

View comparison

Pricing

The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year.

It is expensive.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

3.8 out of 5

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

3.8 out of 5

Digital.ai Continuous Testing automates testing for mobile and web apps, integrating with CI/CD pipelines to boost delivery cycles. Users run automated tests across devices, improving efficiency and stability. It features cross-browser testing, real device cloud access, and Mobile Studio for script generation, enhancing workflows. Users desire better UI/UX and streamlined cloud-device interchangeability.

Pricing

We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support.

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

View comparison

Pricing

We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support.

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

mabl

1 out of 5

mabl

1 out of 5

Mabl simplifies automated testing, offering valuable features like seamless integration and easy test creation. Users appreciate its efficient error tracking. However, there is room for improvement in reporting capabilities and execution speed, which can impact testing processes with complex requirements.

View comparison

Related categories

API Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Functional Testing Tools